{"title":"印尼宗教应对简易量表(Brief R Cope BI)的验证","authors":"Wastu Adi Mulyono, W. Ekowati","doi":"10.20884/1.jks.2023.18.1.7109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Religion and spirituality are determinants of psychological adjustment of coping resources, especially in a religious country such as Indonesia. However, in general, its measurement does not use standardized scales. This study aimed to examine the validity of the Indonesian version of the Brief Measurement of Religious Coping (Brief RCOPE). The sample of this study was 150 women recruited by a consecutive sampling strategy. Exploratory factor analyses were performed to examine the structure’s validity. The criteria’s validity was measured by its correlation with the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory and FACIT Sp12. The exploratory factor analyses indicated that the Indonesian Brief RCOPE satisfied the construct validity. The Bartlett sphericity test was significant (df (91) = 1109.79, p < 0.001), and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test was 0.782. The exploratory factor analyses confirmed that the two-factor design model with 50.4% explained the variance. Positive religious coping was correlated with mindfulness (r = 0.338, p < 0.01) and spirituality (r = 0.317, p< 0.01), while negative religious coping was correlated with perceived stress (0.182, p < 0.05). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for Factor 1 and Factor 2 were 0.83 and 0.82, respectively. Thus, the Indonesian version of Brief RCOPE is valid and reliable for measuring positive and negative religious coping.","PeriodicalId":337731,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Keperawatan Soedirman","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Indonesian Brief Measurement of Religious Coping (Brief R Cope BI)\",\"authors\":\"Wastu Adi Mulyono, W. Ekowati\",\"doi\":\"10.20884/1.jks.2023.18.1.7109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Religion and spirituality are determinants of psychological adjustment of coping resources, especially in a religious country such as Indonesia. However, in general, its measurement does not use standardized scales. This study aimed to examine the validity of the Indonesian version of the Brief Measurement of Religious Coping (Brief RCOPE). The sample of this study was 150 women recruited by a consecutive sampling strategy. Exploratory factor analyses were performed to examine the structure’s validity. The criteria’s validity was measured by its correlation with the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory and FACIT Sp12. The exploratory factor analyses indicated that the Indonesian Brief RCOPE satisfied the construct validity. The Bartlett sphericity test was significant (df (91) = 1109.79, p < 0.001), and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test was 0.782. The exploratory factor analyses confirmed that the two-factor design model with 50.4% explained the variance. Positive religious coping was correlated with mindfulness (r = 0.338, p < 0.01) and spirituality (r = 0.317, p< 0.01), while negative religious coping was correlated with perceived stress (0.182, p < 0.05). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for Factor 1 and Factor 2 were 0.83 and 0.82, respectively. Thus, the Indonesian version of Brief RCOPE is valid and reliable for measuring positive and negative religious coping.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Keperawatan Soedirman\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Keperawatan Soedirman\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jks.2023.18.1.7109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Keperawatan Soedirman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jks.2023.18.1.7109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
宗教和灵性是应对资源的心理调整的决定因素,特别是在印度尼西亚这样的宗教国家。然而,一般来说,它的测量不使用标准化的尺度。本研究旨在检验印尼语版宗教应对简易测量量表(Brief Measurement of Religious Coping, RCOPE)的效度。本研究的样本是通过连续抽样策略招募的150名女性。进行探索性因素分析以检验结构的有效性。通过与Freiburg正念量表和FACIT Sp12的相关性来衡量标准的有效性。探索性因素分析表明,印尼简要RCOPE满足构念效度。Bartlett球形检验显著(df (91) = 1109.79, p < 0.001), Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO)检验显著(0.782)。探索性因子分析证实,双因子设计模型解释了50.4%的方差。积极的宗教应对与正念(r = 0.338, p< 0.01)和灵性(r = 0.317, p< 0.01)相关,消极的宗教应对与感知压力相关(0.182,p< 0.05)。因子1和因子2的Cronbach 's alpha系数分别为0.83和0.82。因此,印尼语版本的简短RCOPE是有效和可靠的衡量积极和消极的宗教应对。
Validation of Indonesian Brief Measurement of Religious Coping (Brief R Cope BI)
Religion and spirituality are determinants of psychological adjustment of coping resources, especially in a religious country such as Indonesia. However, in general, its measurement does not use standardized scales. This study aimed to examine the validity of the Indonesian version of the Brief Measurement of Religious Coping (Brief RCOPE). The sample of this study was 150 women recruited by a consecutive sampling strategy. Exploratory factor analyses were performed to examine the structure’s validity. The criteria’s validity was measured by its correlation with the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory and FACIT Sp12. The exploratory factor analyses indicated that the Indonesian Brief RCOPE satisfied the construct validity. The Bartlett sphericity test was significant (df (91) = 1109.79, p < 0.001), and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test was 0.782. The exploratory factor analyses confirmed that the two-factor design model with 50.4% explained the variance. Positive religious coping was correlated with mindfulness (r = 0.338, p < 0.01) and spirituality (r = 0.317, p< 0.01), while negative religious coping was correlated with perceived stress (0.182, p < 0.05). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for Factor 1 and Factor 2 were 0.83 and 0.82, respectively. Thus, the Indonesian version of Brief RCOPE is valid and reliable for measuring positive and negative religious coping.