基于云的情感识别服务检测精度比较研究

Osamah M. Al-Omair, Shihong Huang
{"title":"基于云的情感识别服务检测精度比较研究","authors":"Osamah M. Al-Omair, Shihong Huang","doi":"10.1145/3297067.3297079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability of software systems adapting to human's input is a key element in the symbiosis of human-system co-adaptation, where human and software-based systems work together in a close partnership to achieve synergetic goals. This seamless integration will eliminate the barriers between human and machine. A critical requirement for co-adaptive systems is software system's ability to recognize human emotion, in which the system can detect and interpret users' emotions and adapt accordingly. There are numerous solutions that provide the technologies for emotion recognition. However, selecting an appropriate solution for a given task within a specific application domain can be challenging. The vast variation between these solutions makes the selecting task even more difficult. This paper compares cloud-based emotion recognition services offered by Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. These services detect human emotion through facial expression recognition with the utilization of computer vision. The focus of this paper is to measure the detection accuracy of these services. Accuracy is calculated based on the highest confidence rating returned by each service. All three services have been tested with the same dataset. This paper concludes with findings and recommendations based on our comparative analysis among these services.","PeriodicalId":340004,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning","volume":"283 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on Detection Accuracy of Cloud-Based Emotion Recognition Services\",\"authors\":\"Osamah M. Al-Omair, Shihong Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3297067.3297079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ability of software systems adapting to human's input is a key element in the symbiosis of human-system co-adaptation, where human and software-based systems work together in a close partnership to achieve synergetic goals. This seamless integration will eliminate the barriers between human and machine. A critical requirement for co-adaptive systems is software system's ability to recognize human emotion, in which the system can detect and interpret users' emotions and adapt accordingly. There are numerous solutions that provide the technologies for emotion recognition. However, selecting an appropriate solution for a given task within a specific application domain can be challenging. The vast variation between these solutions makes the selecting task even more difficult. This paper compares cloud-based emotion recognition services offered by Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. These services detect human emotion through facial expression recognition with the utilization of computer vision. The focus of this paper is to measure the detection accuracy of these services. Accuracy is calculated based on the highest confidence rating returned by each service. All three services have been tested with the same dataset. This paper concludes with findings and recommendations based on our comparative analysis among these services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340004,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning\",\"volume\":\"283 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3297067.3297079\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Signal Processing and Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3297067.3297079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

软件系统适应人类输入的能力是人-系统协同适应共生的关键要素,在这种共生中,人和基于软件的系统以密切的伙伴关系共同工作,以实现协同目标。这种无缝集成将消除人与机器之间的障碍。对协同适应系统的一个关键要求是软件系统识别人类情感的能力,其中系统可以检测和解释用户的情感并相应地进行适应。提供情感识别技术的解决方案有很多。然而,为特定应用程序域中的给定任务选择适当的解决方案可能具有挑战性。这些解决方案之间的巨大差异使得选择任务更加困难。本文比较了亚马逊、谷歌和微软提供的基于云的情感识别服务。这些服务利用计算机视觉通过面部表情识别来检测人类的情绪。本文的重点是测量这些服务的检测精度。准确度是根据每个服务返回的最高置信度来计算的。所有三个服务都使用相同的数据集进行了测试。本文在对这些服务进行比较分析的基础上,提出了结论和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study on Detection Accuracy of Cloud-Based Emotion Recognition Services
The ability of software systems adapting to human's input is a key element in the symbiosis of human-system co-adaptation, where human and software-based systems work together in a close partnership to achieve synergetic goals. This seamless integration will eliminate the barriers between human and machine. A critical requirement for co-adaptive systems is software system's ability to recognize human emotion, in which the system can detect and interpret users' emotions and adapt accordingly. There are numerous solutions that provide the technologies for emotion recognition. However, selecting an appropriate solution for a given task within a specific application domain can be challenging. The vast variation between these solutions makes the selecting task even more difficult. This paper compares cloud-based emotion recognition services offered by Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. These services detect human emotion through facial expression recognition with the utilization of computer vision. The focus of this paper is to measure the detection accuracy of these services. Accuracy is calculated based on the highest confidence rating returned by each service. All three services have been tested with the same dataset. This paper concludes with findings and recommendations based on our comparative analysis among these services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信