练习对SISI得分的影响及SISI得分与强度差值的关系。

J W Sanders, E L Harless
{"title":"练习对SISI得分的影响及SISI得分与强度差值的关系。","authors":"J W Sanders,&nbsp;E L Harless","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The standard short increment sensitivity index (SISI) was given to 24 normal hearing subjects 10 times in two test sessions. For each subject the intensity difference limen was determined with a quantal method using the SISI apparatus. Although the group data indicated a statistically significant improvement in scores across presentations, the change was not clinically significant, in that the highest mean score continued to be \"negative\" in clinical interpretation. Four individual subjects, however, moved from initial sntations. Highest scores achieved by the subjects were found to be significantly related to intensity difference limen. The results suggest that the clinician must be aware of a potential for a clinically significant improvement in SISI score with practice on the part of some subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":76026,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Audiology Society","volume":"2 3","pages":"95-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of practice on SISI scores and the relationship of SISI score to the intensity difference limen.\",\"authors\":\"J W Sanders,&nbsp;E L Harless\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The standard short increment sensitivity index (SISI) was given to 24 normal hearing subjects 10 times in two test sessions. For each subject the intensity difference limen was determined with a quantal method using the SISI apparatus. Although the group data indicated a statistically significant improvement in scores across presentations, the change was not clinically significant, in that the highest mean score continued to be \\\"negative\\\" in clinical interpretation. Four individual subjects, however, moved from initial sntations. Highest scores achieved by the subjects were found to be significantly related to intensity difference limen. The results suggest that the clinician must be aware of a potential for a clinically significant improvement in SISI score with practice on the part of some subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Audiology Society\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"95-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Audiology Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Audiology Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对24名听力正常的受试者进行标准短增量灵敏度指数(SISI)测定,分两组10次。每个受试者的强度差阈值采用SISI仪器的量子方法确定。虽然组内数据显示在不同表现的评分上有统计学上的显著改善,但这种变化在临床上并不显著,因为最高的平均得分在临床解释中仍然是“负的”。然而,有四个单独的受试者从最初的感觉开始移动。被试获得的最高分与强度差异阈值显著相关。结果表明,临床医生必须意识到,在一些受试者的实践中,SISI评分可能会有临床意义上的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of practice on SISI scores and the relationship of SISI score to the intensity difference limen.

The standard short increment sensitivity index (SISI) was given to 24 normal hearing subjects 10 times in two test sessions. For each subject the intensity difference limen was determined with a quantal method using the SISI apparatus. Although the group data indicated a statistically significant improvement in scores across presentations, the change was not clinically significant, in that the highest mean score continued to be "negative" in clinical interpretation. Four individual subjects, however, moved from initial sntations. Highest scores achieved by the subjects were found to be significantly related to intensity difference limen. The results suggest that the clinician must be aware of a potential for a clinically significant improvement in SISI score with practice on the part of some subjects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信