替代制冷剂汽车空调系统的实验研究

M. Ismail, Abduallah Gamal
{"title":"替代制冷剂汽车空调系统的实验研究","authors":"M. Ismail, Abduallah Gamal","doi":"10.54216/fpa.050104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimizing efficiency studies were carried out to comply with environmental norms by using MCDM techniques to pick low GWP refrigerants for automotive air conditioning. Multi-criteria optimization for time consumption based on ratio analysis plus full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA), is being employed in this work to compare 10 distinct alternatives with 10 criteria. Thermal conductivity, vapor pressure, saturation fluid density, latent specific heat, fluid viscosity, GWP, ozone-depleting potential, and cost per pound are among the many response qualities suited for data acquisition in terms of thermodynamics, environmental stewardship, and economics. It is possible to standardize decision-makers' grading and weighting systems using MCDM methodologies. RAA3 had the greatest rank among the 10 refrigerants tested in the MULTIMOORA methodology. The EDAS and TOPSIS techniques identified R-744 to be the worst refrigerant, whereas the MOORA approach showed RAA5 to be the worst refrigerant.","PeriodicalId":269527,"journal":{"name":"Fusion: Practice and Applications","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental study of an automotive air conditioning system with alternative refrigerants\",\"authors\":\"M. Ismail, Abduallah Gamal\",\"doi\":\"10.54216/fpa.050104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Optimizing efficiency studies were carried out to comply with environmental norms by using MCDM techniques to pick low GWP refrigerants for automotive air conditioning. Multi-criteria optimization for time consumption based on ratio analysis plus full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA), is being employed in this work to compare 10 distinct alternatives with 10 criteria. Thermal conductivity, vapor pressure, saturation fluid density, latent specific heat, fluid viscosity, GWP, ozone-depleting potential, and cost per pound are among the many response qualities suited for data acquisition in terms of thermodynamics, environmental stewardship, and economics. It is possible to standardize decision-makers' grading and weighting systems using MCDM methodologies. RAA3 had the greatest rank among the 10 refrigerants tested in the MULTIMOORA methodology. The EDAS and TOPSIS techniques identified R-744 to be the worst refrigerant, whereas the MOORA approach showed RAA5 to be the worst refrigerant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fusion: Practice and Applications\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fusion: Practice and Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54216/fpa.050104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fusion: Practice and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54216/fpa.050104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用MCDM技术为汽车空调选择低GWP制冷剂,进行了符合环境规范的优化效率研究。基于比率分析和全乘法形式(MULTIMOORA)的时间消耗多准则优化在这项工作中被用于比较10个不同的替代方案和10个标准。热导率、蒸汽压、饱和流体密度、潜比热、流体粘度、GWP、臭氧消耗潜势和每磅成本是适用于热力学、环境管理和经济方面数据采集的许多响应质量。使用MCDM方法使决策者的评分和加权系统标准化是可能的。在MULTIMOORA方法测试的10种制冷剂中,RAA3的排名最高。EDAS和TOPSIS方法确定R-744是最差的制冷剂,而MOORA方法显示RAA5是最差的制冷剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental study of an automotive air conditioning system with alternative refrigerants
Optimizing efficiency studies were carried out to comply with environmental norms by using MCDM techniques to pick low GWP refrigerants for automotive air conditioning. Multi-criteria optimization for time consumption based on ratio analysis plus full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA), is being employed in this work to compare 10 distinct alternatives with 10 criteria. Thermal conductivity, vapor pressure, saturation fluid density, latent specific heat, fluid viscosity, GWP, ozone-depleting potential, and cost per pound are among the many response qualities suited for data acquisition in terms of thermodynamics, environmental stewardship, and economics. It is possible to standardize decision-makers' grading and weighting systems using MCDM methodologies. RAA3 had the greatest rank among the 10 refrigerants tested in the MULTIMOORA methodology. The EDAS and TOPSIS techniques identified R-744 to be the worst refrigerant, whereas the MOORA approach showed RAA5 to be the worst refrigerant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信