结论:整理过去

Bente Jacobsen, David Beer
{"title":"结论:整理过去","authors":"Bente Jacobsen, David Beer","doi":"10.46692/9781529218176.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conclusion brings together the various threads of the book, suggesting that there is a need to better understand the underlying classification and prioritisation processes and their consequences for memory in everyday life. The conclusion outlines how the book has sought to make a specific intervention into the automatic production of memory. It is suggested that the concept of memory, and what we understand memories to be, is unlikely to go untouched by these developments. The book finishes by suggesting that there is a need for a sustained engagement with broader issues related to the algorithmic interventions that are active in in memory-making, along with a careful exploration of what people make of these processes and how they respond to them. Indeed, the changes that social media are bringing to the politics of remembering is too important to leave unchecked.","PeriodicalId":123207,"journal":{"name":"Social Media and the Automatic Production of Memory","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conclusion: Sorting the Past\",\"authors\":\"Bente Jacobsen, David Beer\",\"doi\":\"10.46692/9781529218176.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The conclusion brings together the various threads of the book, suggesting that there is a need to better understand the underlying classification and prioritisation processes and their consequences for memory in everyday life. The conclusion outlines how the book has sought to make a specific intervention into the automatic production of memory. It is suggested that the concept of memory, and what we understand memories to be, is unlikely to go untouched by these developments. The book finishes by suggesting that there is a need for a sustained engagement with broader issues related to the algorithmic interventions that are active in in memory-making, along with a careful exploration of what people make of these processes and how they respond to them. Indeed, the changes that social media are bringing to the politics of remembering is too important to leave unchecked.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Media and the Automatic Production of Memory\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Media and the Automatic Production of Memory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529218176.005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Media and the Automatic Production of Memory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529218176.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结论汇集了书中的各种线索,表明有必要更好地理解潜在的分类和优先排序过程,以及它们对日常生活中记忆的影响。结论部分概述了这本书是如何试图对记忆的自动生成进行具体干预的。这表明,记忆的概念,以及我们对记忆的理解,不太可能不受这些发展的影响。本书最后提出,有必要持续关注与算法干预相关的更广泛的问题,这些问题活跃于记忆的形成过程中,同时还需要仔细探索人们对这些过程的看法以及他们如何应对这些过程。事实上,社交媒体给记忆政治带来的变化太重要了,不能任其发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conclusion: Sorting the Past
The conclusion brings together the various threads of the book, suggesting that there is a need to better understand the underlying classification and prioritisation processes and their consequences for memory in everyday life. The conclusion outlines how the book has sought to make a specific intervention into the automatic production of memory. It is suggested that the concept of memory, and what we understand memories to be, is unlikely to go untouched by these developments. The book finishes by suggesting that there is a need for a sustained engagement with broader issues related to the algorithmic interventions that are active in in memory-making, along with a careful exploration of what people make of these processes and how they respond to them. Indeed, the changes that social media are bringing to the politics of remembering is too important to leave unchecked.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信