{"title":"具有不可靠故障检测器的非阻塞原子提交","authors":"R. Guerraoui, M. Larrea, A. Schiper","doi":"10.1109/RELDIS.1995.518722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a transactional system, an atomic commitment protocol ensures that for any transaction, all data manager processes agree on the same outcome (commit or abort). A non-blocking atomic commitment protocol enables an outcome to be decided at every correct process despite the failure of others. In this paper we apply, for the first time, the fundamental result of T. Chandra and S. Toueg (1991) on solving the abstract consensus problem, to non-blocking atomic commitment. More precisely, we present a non-blocking atomic commitment protocol in an asynchronous system augmented with an unreliable failure detector that can make an infinity of false failure suspicions. If no process is suspected to have failed, then our protocol is similar to a three phase commit protocol. In the case where processes are suspected, our protocol does not require any additional termination protocol: failure scenarios are handled within our regular protocol and are thus much simpler to manage.","PeriodicalId":275219,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"60","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non blocking atomic commitment with an unreliable failure detector\",\"authors\":\"R. Guerraoui, M. Larrea, A. Schiper\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RELDIS.1995.518722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a transactional system, an atomic commitment protocol ensures that for any transaction, all data manager processes agree on the same outcome (commit or abort). A non-blocking atomic commitment protocol enables an outcome to be decided at every correct process despite the failure of others. In this paper we apply, for the first time, the fundamental result of T. Chandra and S. Toueg (1991) on solving the abstract consensus problem, to non-blocking atomic commitment. More precisely, we present a non-blocking atomic commitment protocol in an asynchronous system augmented with an unreliable failure detector that can make an infinity of false failure suspicions. If no process is suspected to have failed, then our protocol is similar to a three phase commit protocol. In the case where processes are suspected, our protocol does not require any additional termination protocol: failure scenarios are handled within our regular protocol and are thus much simpler to manage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"60\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RELDIS.1995.518722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 14th Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RELDIS.1995.518722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Non blocking atomic commitment with an unreliable failure detector
In a transactional system, an atomic commitment protocol ensures that for any transaction, all data manager processes agree on the same outcome (commit or abort). A non-blocking atomic commitment protocol enables an outcome to be decided at every correct process despite the failure of others. In this paper we apply, for the first time, the fundamental result of T. Chandra and S. Toueg (1991) on solving the abstract consensus problem, to non-blocking atomic commitment. More precisely, we present a non-blocking atomic commitment protocol in an asynchronous system augmented with an unreliable failure detector that can make an infinity of false failure suspicions. If no process is suspected to have failed, then our protocol is similar to a three phase commit protocol. In the case where processes are suspected, our protocol does not require any additional termination protocol: failure scenarios are handled within our regular protocol and are thus much simpler to manage.