让我们来角色扮演!视频频率和角色扮演对心理安全小组干预效用的影响

Ava Drum, C. Cole, Sarah C. Ritter, Susan Mohammed, K. Jablokow, Scarlett Miller
{"title":"让我们来角色扮演!视频频率和角色扮演对心理安全小组干预效用的影响","authors":"Ava Drum, C. Cole, Sarah C. Ritter, Susan Mohammed, K. Jablokow, Scarlett Miller","doi":"10.1115/detc2022-90848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n There is growing evidence on the importance of psychological safety, or how comfortable participants feel in sharing their opinions and ideas in a team, in engineering team performance. However, how to support it in engineering student teams has yet to be explored. The goal of this study was to investigate whether a video intervention with assigned roles could foster psychological safety in student engineering teams. In addition, we sought to explore the impact of the frequency of the videos and the utility of the roles on the self-efficacy of students and the perceived psychological safety of the team. Specifically, this study introduces video interventions and the four lenses of psychological safety (Turn-Taking Equalizer, Point of View Shifter, Affirmation Advocate, and Creativity Promoter), and seeks to determine their effectiveness at increasing psychological safety self-efficacy and individual levels of psychological safety. A pilot study was completed with 54 participants (36 males, 17 females, 1 non-binary/third gender) enrolled in a cornerstone engineering design course. Over 10 weeks, data was collected at 5 time points. The results present four key findings. Most notably, 1) a video educating all students about psychological safety in general was effective in improving psychological safety self-efficacy and students retained this information to the end of the project;2) intervention groups taught to use the four lenses did not have a statistically significant higher level of psychological safety than nonintervention groups; and 3) intervention groups perceived the use of the lenses to increase psychological safety. These results provide a baseline understanding that is needed to support psychological safety including: when to intervene, how to intervene, and how frequently to intervene.","PeriodicalId":270086,"journal":{"name":"Volume 4: 19th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Let’s Role Play! the Impact of Video Frequency and Role Playing on the Utility of a Psychological Safety Team Intervention\",\"authors\":\"Ava Drum, C. Cole, Sarah C. Ritter, Susan Mohammed, K. Jablokow, Scarlett Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/detc2022-90848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n There is growing evidence on the importance of psychological safety, or how comfortable participants feel in sharing their opinions and ideas in a team, in engineering team performance. However, how to support it in engineering student teams has yet to be explored. The goal of this study was to investigate whether a video intervention with assigned roles could foster psychological safety in student engineering teams. In addition, we sought to explore the impact of the frequency of the videos and the utility of the roles on the self-efficacy of students and the perceived psychological safety of the team. Specifically, this study introduces video interventions and the four lenses of psychological safety (Turn-Taking Equalizer, Point of View Shifter, Affirmation Advocate, and Creativity Promoter), and seeks to determine their effectiveness at increasing psychological safety self-efficacy and individual levels of psychological safety. A pilot study was completed with 54 participants (36 males, 17 females, 1 non-binary/third gender) enrolled in a cornerstone engineering design course. Over 10 weeks, data was collected at 5 time points. The results present four key findings. Most notably, 1) a video educating all students about psychological safety in general was effective in improving psychological safety self-efficacy and students retained this information to the end of the project;2) intervention groups taught to use the four lenses did not have a statistically significant higher level of psychological safety than nonintervention groups; and 3) intervention groups perceived the use of the lenses to increase psychological safety. These results provide a baseline understanding that is needed to support psychological safety including: when to intervene, how to intervene, and how frequently to intervene.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 4: 19th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 4: 19th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-90848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 4: 19th International Conference on Design Education (DEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-90848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

越来越多的证据表明心理安全的重要性,或者说参与者在团队中分享他们的观点和想法时的舒适程度,在工程团队的表现中。然而,如何在工程学生团队中支持它还有待探索。本研究的目的是探讨具有指定角色的视频干预是否可以促进学生工程团队的心理安全。此外,我们试图探讨视频频率和角色效用对学生自我效能感和团队心理安全感的影响。具体而言,本研究引入了视频干预和心理安全的四个镜头(转向均衡器、观点转移器、肯定倡导者和创造力促进者),并试图确定它们在提高心理安全自我效能感和个体心理安全水平方面的有效性。54名参与者(36名男性,17名女性,1名非二元/第三性别)参加了基础工程设计课程,完成了一项试点研究。在10周内,在5个时间点收集数据。研究结果提出了四个主要发现。最值得注意的是,1)一个教育所有学生关于心理安全的视频在提高心理安全自我效能感方面是有效的,并且学生在项目结束时都保留了这些信息;2)教授使用四种镜头的干预组的心理安全水平没有统计学上显著高于非干预组;3)干预组认为使用隐形眼镜增加了心理安全感。这些结果提供了支持心理安全所需的基本认识,包括:何时干预,如何干预,以及干预的频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Let’s Role Play! the Impact of Video Frequency and Role Playing on the Utility of a Psychological Safety Team Intervention
There is growing evidence on the importance of psychological safety, or how comfortable participants feel in sharing their opinions and ideas in a team, in engineering team performance. However, how to support it in engineering student teams has yet to be explored. The goal of this study was to investigate whether a video intervention with assigned roles could foster psychological safety in student engineering teams. In addition, we sought to explore the impact of the frequency of the videos and the utility of the roles on the self-efficacy of students and the perceived psychological safety of the team. Specifically, this study introduces video interventions and the four lenses of psychological safety (Turn-Taking Equalizer, Point of View Shifter, Affirmation Advocate, and Creativity Promoter), and seeks to determine their effectiveness at increasing psychological safety self-efficacy and individual levels of psychological safety. A pilot study was completed with 54 participants (36 males, 17 females, 1 non-binary/third gender) enrolled in a cornerstone engineering design course. Over 10 weeks, data was collected at 5 time points. The results present four key findings. Most notably, 1) a video educating all students about psychological safety in general was effective in improving psychological safety self-efficacy and students retained this information to the end of the project;2) intervention groups taught to use the four lenses did not have a statistically significant higher level of psychological safety than nonintervention groups; and 3) intervention groups perceived the use of the lenses to increase psychological safety. These results provide a baseline understanding that is needed to support psychological safety including: when to intervene, how to intervene, and how frequently to intervene.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信