{"title":"90度弯头湍流管道流动的壁y+法数值模拟","authors":"A. Abuhatira, S. Salim, J. Vorstius","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-69986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study presents the use of the wall y+ approach as a form of guidance for reliable selection of mesh and turbulence models in bent pipe flow investigations. The research builds on previous studies recommended by Salim et al.[1]–[3] for using the wall y+ approach to balance between the computational cost and time. This method is proposed as an effective tool for selecting an appropriate near wall treatment and corresponding turbulence model and remove the necessity of physical validation when experimental data is unavailable or difficult to obtain. Flow in a 90-degree pipe elbow is modelled using the ANSYS FLUENT CFD solver to evaluate the performance of different Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models. The RANS models tested are the standard k-ε, the Reynolds Stress Model (RSM), the k–ω Shear Stress Transport (SST) and the Spalart–Allmaras. A range of near wall spatial resolutions is used to determine the effectiveness of near wall modelling techniques when used in conjunction with each of the turbulence models. The near-wall treatments are investigated by solving the y+ values for the first layer of cells are in the viscous sublayer (y+ ≈ 3), buffer region (y+ ≈ 19) and log law region (y+ ≈ 39). The achieved results in this current study using the wall y+ approach are compared against experimental data published by Sudo et al.[4] and numerical simulations published by Kim et al.[5]. Qualitative analysis and quantitative assessment are carried out to identify which turbulence model agrees best with the published data. It is observed that the near wall models provide better results when the y+ values for the first layer of near wall cells are within viscous sublayer in comparison to simulations where it is in the buffer and log-low regions. The RSM predicts the flow field most accurately when compared against the reference data. This in turn will allow pipeline designers to assess the effectiveness of their design, and any potential problems with it, before the manufacturing stage.","PeriodicalId":112698,"journal":{"name":"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Pipe Flow With 90-Degree Elbow Using Wall y+ Approach\",\"authors\":\"A. Abuhatira, S. Salim, J. Vorstius\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2021-69986\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This study presents the use of the wall y+ approach as a form of guidance for reliable selection of mesh and turbulence models in bent pipe flow investigations. The research builds on previous studies recommended by Salim et al.[1]–[3] for using the wall y+ approach to balance between the computational cost and time. This method is proposed as an effective tool for selecting an appropriate near wall treatment and corresponding turbulence model and remove the necessity of physical validation when experimental data is unavailable or difficult to obtain. Flow in a 90-degree pipe elbow is modelled using the ANSYS FLUENT CFD solver to evaluate the performance of different Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models. The RANS models tested are the standard k-ε, the Reynolds Stress Model (RSM), the k–ω Shear Stress Transport (SST) and the Spalart–Allmaras. A range of near wall spatial resolutions is used to determine the effectiveness of near wall modelling techniques when used in conjunction with each of the turbulence models. The near-wall treatments are investigated by solving the y+ values for the first layer of cells are in the viscous sublayer (y+ ≈ 3), buffer region (y+ ≈ 19) and log law region (y+ ≈ 39). The achieved results in this current study using the wall y+ approach are compared against experimental data published by Sudo et al.[4] and numerical simulations published by Kim et al.[5]. Qualitative analysis and quantitative assessment are carried out to identify which turbulence model agrees best with the published data. It is observed that the near wall models provide better results when the y+ values for the first layer of near wall cells are within viscous sublayer in comparison to simulations where it is in the buffer and log-low regions. The RSM predicts the flow field most accurately when compared against the reference data. This in turn will allow pipeline designers to assess the effectiveness of their design, and any potential problems with it, before the manufacturing stage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-69986\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 10: Fluids Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-69986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究提出使用壁面y+方法作为一种指导形式,在弯曲管流动研究中可靠地选择网格和湍流模型。该研究基于Salim等人[1]-[3]推荐的先前研究,使用wall y+方法来平衡计算成本和时间。该方法是选择合适的近壁处理和相应的湍流模型的有效工具,在没有实验数据或难以获得实验数据的情况下,消除了物理验证的必要性。使用ANSYS FLUENT CFD求解器对90度弯管内的流动进行建模,以评估不同的reynolds - average Navier-Stokes (RANS)湍流模型的性能。试验的RANS模型有标准k-ε模型、雷诺应力模型(RSM)、k -ω剪切应力输运模型(SST)和Spalart-Allmaras模型。一系列近壁空间分辨率用于确定与每种湍流模型结合使用时近壁建模技术的有效性。通过求解第一层细胞在粘性亚层(y+≈3)、缓冲区(y+≈19)和对数律区(y+≈39)的y+值来研究近壁处理。本研究使用wall y+方法获得的结果与Sudo等人[4]发表的实验数据和Kim等人[5]发表的数值模拟结果进行了比较。进行了定性分析和定量评估,以确定哪种湍流模型最符合已发表的数据。观察到,当近壁细胞的第一层的y+值在粘性亚层内时,与在缓冲区和低对数区模拟相比,近壁模型提供了更好的结果。与参考数据相比,RSM最准确地预测了流场。反过来,这将允许管道设计人员在制造阶段之前评估其设计的有效性,以及任何潜在的问题。
Numerical Simulation of Turbulent Pipe Flow With 90-Degree Elbow Using Wall y+ Approach
This study presents the use of the wall y+ approach as a form of guidance for reliable selection of mesh and turbulence models in bent pipe flow investigations. The research builds on previous studies recommended by Salim et al.[1]–[3] for using the wall y+ approach to balance between the computational cost and time. This method is proposed as an effective tool for selecting an appropriate near wall treatment and corresponding turbulence model and remove the necessity of physical validation when experimental data is unavailable or difficult to obtain. Flow in a 90-degree pipe elbow is modelled using the ANSYS FLUENT CFD solver to evaluate the performance of different Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) turbulence models. The RANS models tested are the standard k-ε, the Reynolds Stress Model (RSM), the k–ω Shear Stress Transport (SST) and the Spalart–Allmaras. A range of near wall spatial resolutions is used to determine the effectiveness of near wall modelling techniques when used in conjunction with each of the turbulence models. The near-wall treatments are investigated by solving the y+ values for the first layer of cells are in the viscous sublayer (y+ ≈ 3), buffer region (y+ ≈ 19) and log law region (y+ ≈ 39). The achieved results in this current study using the wall y+ approach are compared against experimental data published by Sudo et al.[4] and numerical simulations published by Kim et al.[5]. Qualitative analysis and quantitative assessment are carried out to identify which turbulence model agrees best with the published data. It is observed that the near wall models provide better results when the y+ values for the first layer of near wall cells are within viscous sublayer in comparison to simulations where it is in the buffer and log-low regions. The RSM predicts the flow field most accurately when compared against the reference data. This in turn will allow pipeline designers to assess the effectiveness of their design, and any potential problems with it, before the manufacturing stage.