{"title":"正在进行的语法化","authors":"Kiri Lee, Y. Cho","doi":"10.1075/alal.22001.lee","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Korean and Japanese are typical classifier languages that classify a noun based on the semantic type of its\n referent with a counter word when plurality is involved. Their plural marking appears to be optional when the noun denotes general\n plurality, but obligatory when a noun is marked by the semantic feature, [+specific] (Ioni, Ko\n & Wexler, 2004). In this study, we characterize the so-called ‘optional’ plurality in Korean and Japanese as the\n manifestation of the grammaticalization. Drawing on actual data, we demonstrate that the plural suffix is increasingly used as a\n neutral plural marker. The grammaticalization is more prevalent when the nouns are higher in the Animacy Hierarchy (e.g., Comrie, 1989), although there are differences in acceptability between Korean and\n Japanese. We attribute the differences to the language-specific uses of the plural suffix, namely, Japanese associative reading\n and Korean event-plural reading (Song, 1997).","PeriodicalId":322360,"journal":{"name":"Asian Languages and Linguistics","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grammaticalization in progress\",\"authors\":\"Kiri Lee, Y. Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/alal.22001.lee\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Korean and Japanese are typical classifier languages that classify a noun based on the semantic type of its\\n referent with a counter word when plurality is involved. Their plural marking appears to be optional when the noun denotes general\\n plurality, but obligatory when a noun is marked by the semantic feature, [+specific] (Ioni, Ko\\n & Wexler, 2004). In this study, we characterize the so-called ‘optional’ plurality in Korean and Japanese as the\\n manifestation of the grammaticalization. Drawing on actual data, we demonstrate that the plural suffix is increasingly used as a\\n neutral plural marker. The grammaticalization is more prevalent when the nouns are higher in the Animacy Hierarchy (e.g., Comrie, 1989), although there are differences in acceptability between Korean and\\n Japanese. We attribute the differences to the language-specific uses of the plural suffix, namely, Japanese associative reading\\n and Korean event-plural reading (Song, 1997).\",\"PeriodicalId\":322360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Languages and Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Languages and Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.22001.lee\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Languages and Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/alal.22001.lee","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
韩语和日语是典型的分类语言,在涉及复数的情况下,根据指代物的语义类型和对应词对名词进行分类。当名词表示一般复数时,他们的复数标记似乎是可选的,但当一个名词被语义特征标记时,[+specific]是强制性的(Ioni, Ko & Wexler, 2004)。在本研究中,我们将韩语和日语中所谓的“可选择的”多元性描述为语法化的表现。根据实际数据,我们证明了复数后缀越来越多地被用作中性复数标记。尽管韩语和日语在可接受性上存在差异,但当名词在Animacy Hierarchy中处于较高位置时,语法化更为普遍(例如,Comrie, 1989)。我们将这种差异归因于对复数后缀的特定语言使用,即日语的联想阅读和韩语的事件复数阅读(Song, 1997)。
Korean and Japanese are typical classifier languages that classify a noun based on the semantic type of its
referent with a counter word when plurality is involved. Their plural marking appears to be optional when the noun denotes general
plurality, but obligatory when a noun is marked by the semantic feature, [+specific] (Ioni, Ko
& Wexler, 2004). In this study, we characterize the so-called ‘optional’ plurality in Korean and Japanese as the
manifestation of the grammaticalization. Drawing on actual data, we demonstrate that the plural suffix is increasingly used as a
neutral plural marker. The grammaticalization is more prevalent when the nouns are higher in the Animacy Hierarchy (e.g., Comrie, 1989), although there are differences in acceptability between Korean and
Japanese. We attribute the differences to the language-specific uses of the plural suffix, namely, Japanese associative reading
and Korean event-plural reading (Song, 1997).