{"title":"分析丹东视频会议的业务质量,采用丹东bigbluebutton pad虚拟专用服务器","authors":"I. B. A. I. Iswara, I. P. P. Yasa","doi":"10.31598/jurnalresistor.v4i2.794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of video conferencing technology is increasing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Bigbluebutton and jitsi are examples of open source video conferencing platforms that can be installed on their own servers. The server is created using a cloud-based virtual machine. Analysis of quality of service which includes delay, packet loss, throughput, and jitter is needed to determine the quality of service and the comparison of the two platforms. Observations were also made on the use of CPU, memory / RAM, and disk usage for each server. There are 3 test scenarios carried out. Each scenario is carried out on each existing VM specification. From this test, it is known that in the delay parameter, the highest bigbluebutton is obtained, which is 35,35 ms. And then the highest jitsi delay is 17,66 ms. In packet loss parameters, jitsi obtained the highest yield, namely 0,29%, while for bigbluebutton only 0,16% of packet loss was the highest. Throughput, bigbluebutton and jitsi all got very bad results. However, bigbluebutton obtained better results, namely, the highest throughput was 5.6%. While Jitsi obtained the highest throughput, namely 2,8%. Whereas for the jitter parameter, jitsi obtained 0,00 ms results on all tests in each VM. Meanwhile, bigbluebutton, get 0,1 ms on test 3 on VM 1","PeriodicalId":164171,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal RESISTOR (Rekayasa Sistem Komputer)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS DAN PERBANDINGAN QUALITY OF SERVICE VIDEO CONFERENCE JITSI DAN BIGBLUEBUTTON PADA VIRTUAL PRIVATE SERVER\",\"authors\":\"I. B. A. I. Iswara, I. P. P. Yasa\",\"doi\":\"10.31598/jurnalresistor.v4i2.794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The use of video conferencing technology is increasing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Bigbluebutton and jitsi are examples of open source video conferencing platforms that can be installed on their own servers. The server is created using a cloud-based virtual machine. Analysis of quality of service which includes delay, packet loss, throughput, and jitter is needed to determine the quality of service and the comparison of the two platforms. Observations were also made on the use of CPU, memory / RAM, and disk usage for each server. There are 3 test scenarios carried out. Each scenario is carried out on each existing VM specification. From this test, it is known that in the delay parameter, the highest bigbluebutton is obtained, which is 35,35 ms. And then the highest jitsi delay is 17,66 ms. In packet loss parameters, jitsi obtained the highest yield, namely 0,29%, while for bigbluebutton only 0,16% of packet loss was the highest. Throughput, bigbluebutton and jitsi all got very bad results. However, bigbluebutton obtained better results, namely, the highest throughput was 5.6%. While Jitsi obtained the highest throughput, namely 2,8%. Whereas for the jitter parameter, jitsi obtained 0,00 ms results on all tests in each VM. Meanwhile, bigbluebutton, get 0,1 ms on test 3 on VM 1\",\"PeriodicalId\":164171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal RESISTOR (Rekayasa Sistem Komputer)\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal RESISTOR (Rekayasa Sistem Komputer)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31598/jurnalresistor.v4i2.794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal RESISTOR (Rekayasa Sistem Komputer)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31598/jurnalresistor.v4i2.794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
由于新冠肺炎疫情,视频会议技术的使用正在增加。Bigbluebutton和jitsi是可以安装在自己的服务器上的开源视频会议平台的例子。服务器是使用基于云的虚拟机创建的。需要分析服务质量,包括延迟、丢包、吞吐量和抖动,以确定服务质量并对两个平台进行比较。还对每个服务器的CPU、内存/ RAM和磁盘使用情况进行了观察。有3个测试场景。每个场景都是在现有的虚拟机规格上执行的。从本次测试可知,在延迟参数中,获得了最高的bigbluebutton,为35,35 ms。最高的jitsi延迟是1766毫秒。在丢包参数中,jitsi的丢包率最高,为0.29%,而bigbluebutton丢包率最高,仅为0.16%。吞吐量,bigbluebutton和jitsi都得到了非常糟糕的结果。然而,bigbluebutton获得了更好的结果,即最高吞吐量为5.6%。而Jitsi获得了最高的吞吐量,即2.8%。而对于抖动参数,jitsi在每个VM的所有测试中获得了0 000毫秒的结果。同时,bigbluebutton在VM 1上的测试3上获得0.1 ms
ANALISIS DAN PERBANDINGAN QUALITY OF SERVICE VIDEO CONFERENCE JITSI DAN BIGBLUEBUTTON PADA VIRTUAL PRIVATE SERVER
The use of video conferencing technology is increasing due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Bigbluebutton and jitsi are examples of open source video conferencing platforms that can be installed on their own servers. The server is created using a cloud-based virtual machine. Analysis of quality of service which includes delay, packet loss, throughput, and jitter is needed to determine the quality of service and the comparison of the two platforms. Observations were also made on the use of CPU, memory / RAM, and disk usage for each server. There are 3 test scenarios carried out. Each scenario is carried out on each existing VM specification. From this test, it is known that in the delay parameter, the highest bigbluebutton is obtained, which is 35,35 ms. And then the highest jitsi delay is 17,66 ms. In packet loss parameters, jitsi obtained the highest yield, namely 0,29%, while for bigbluebutton only 0,16% of packet loss was the highest. Throughput, bigbluebutton and jitsi all got very bad results. However, bigbluebutton obtained better results, namely, the highest throughput was 5.6%. While Jitsi obtained the highest throughput, namely 2,8%. Whereas for the jitter parameter, jitsi obtained 0,00 ms results on all tests in each VM. Meanwhile, bigbluebutton, get 0,1 ms on test 3 on VM 1