{"title":"权力、安全与国际公法——错综复杂的关系","authors":"T. Marauhn, Marie-Christin Stenzel","doi":"10.5771/9783845293547-265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter, taking ius ad bellum and ius in bello as reference areas, focuses on the triangular relationship between power, security and public international law. It addresses the role of international law in processes of securitization as well as the complementary impact of acts of securitization on the development of international law. In this context, the question is raised to what extent the law legitimizes or constrains power.","PeriodicalId":318436,"journal":{"name":"Conceptualizing Power in Dynamics of Securitization","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power, Security, and Public International Law – an Intricate Relationship\",\"authors\":\"T. Marauhn, Marie-Christin Stenzel\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/9783845293547-265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter, taking ius ad bellum and ius in bello as reference areas, focuses on the triangular relationship between power, security and public international law. It addresses the role of international law in processes of securitization as well as the complementary impact of acts of securitization on the development of international law. In this context, the question is raised to what extent the law legitimizes or constrains power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":318436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conceptualizing Power in Dynamics of Securitization\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conceptualizing Power in Dynamics of Securitization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845293547-265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conceptualizing Power in Dynamics of Securitization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845293547-265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Power, Security, and Public International Law – an Intricate Relationship
This chapter, taking ius ad bellum and ius in bello as reference areas, focuses on the triangular relationship between power, security and public international law. It addresses the role of international law in processes of securitization as well as the complementary impact of acts of securitization on the development of international law. In this context, the question is raised to what extent the law legitimizes or constrains power.