寻找电子束掩模最佳工艺点的新方法

Photomask Japan Pub Date : 2021-08-23 DOI:10.1117/12.2604372
U. Hofmann, H. Sailer, S. Martens, N. Unal
{"title":"寻找电子束掩模最佳工艺点的新方法","authors":"U. Hofmann, H. Sailer, S. Martens, N. Unal","doi":"10.1117/12.2604372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To this day there is no established practical method available to identify the “optimal” base dose in e-Beam lithography for mask making. Methods range from choosing the “zero-bias” exposure dose that yields CDmeasured = CDtarget to real isofocal calibrations that require to print the structures at different blurs/focus settings. While the latter yields an optimal base dose, it requires a significant experimental procedure, whereas the former uses a pretty simple experiment but will likely yield a non-optimal base dose due to process effects (e.g., lateral resist development). Here we present a novel method to find the optimum base dose for e-Beam mask exposures that requires only a simple experiment. Surprisingly, the exposure doses required to print features with different densities at the same CD does depend on the process point, adding an error term to the proximity effect correction in case the correction is not aligned to this. This is due to the fact that for a given stack and acceleration voltage, a PEC method will deliver one fixed dose range, whereas the experimentally required dose range depends on the process point chosen. This observation can be used to calibrate the base dose such that it matches the dose range obtained from PEC. Moreover, it can be used to add a new criterion to proximity effect correction – the iso-focal condition - to not only correct for line width (also called critical dimension, CD) linearity and density dependent effect, but to also add immunity to process variations such as focus and blur variations.","PeriodicalId":138407,"journal":{"name":"Photomask Japan","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Novel method to find the best process point in e-beam mask making\",\"authors\":\"U. Hofmann, H. Sailer, S. Martens, N. Unal\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2604372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To this day there is no established practical method available to identify the “optimal” base dose in e-Beam lithography for mask making. Methods range from choosing the “zero-bias” exposure dose that yields CDmeasured = CDtarget to real isofocal calibrations that require to print the structures at different blurs/focus settings. While the latter yields an optimal base dose, it requires a significant experimental procedure, whereas the former uses a pretty simple experiment but will likely yield a non-optimal base dose due to process effects (e.g., lateral resist development). Here we present a novel method to find the optimum base dose for e-Beam mask exposures that requires only a simple experiment. Surprisingly, the exposure doses required to print features with different densities at the same CD does depend on the process point, adding an error term to the proximity effect correction in case the correction is not aligned to this. This is due to the fact that for a given stack and acceleration voltage, a PEC method will deliver one fixed dose range, whereas the experimentally required dose range depends on the process point chosen. This observation can be used to calibrate the base dose such that it matches the dose range obtained from PEC. Moreover, it can be used to add a new criterion to proximity effect correction – the iso-focal condition - to not only correct for line width (also called critical dimension, CD) linearity and density dependent effect, but to also add immunity to process variations such as focus and blur variations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photomask Japan\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photomask Japan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2604372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photomask Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2604372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

到目前为止,还没有确定的实用方法来确定用于掩模制作的电子束光刻中的“最佳”基础剂量。方法范围从选择产生CDmeasured = CDtarget的“零偏差”暴露剂量到需要在不同模糊/焦点设置下打印结构的实际等焦校准。而后者产生最佳基础剂量,它需要一个重要的实验程序,而前者使用一个相当简单的实验,但可能会产生非最佳基础剂量,由于工艺效应(例如,横向抗药发展)。在这里,我们提出了一种新的方法来找到最佳的基础剂量的电子束掩模暴露,只需要一个简单的实验。令人惊讶的是,在同一张CD上以不同密度打印特征所需的曝光剂量确实取决于工艺点,如果校正与此不一致,则在接近效应校正中添加误差项。这是因为对于给定的堆叠和加速电压,PEC方法将提供一个固定的剂量范围,而实验所需的剂量范围取决于所选择的工艺点。这一观察结果可用于校准基础剂量,使其与从PEC获得的剂量范围相匹配。此外,它还可以用于为接近效应校正增加一个新的准则——等焦条件,不仅可以校正线宽(也称为临界尺寸,CD)线性度和密度依赖效应,还可以增加对焦点和模糊变化等工艺变化的免疫力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Novel method to find the best process point in e-beam mask making
To this day there is no established practical method available to identify the “optimal” base dose in e-Beam lithography for mask making. Methods range from choosing the “zero-bias” exposure dose that yields CDmeasured = CDtarget to real isofocal calibrations that require to print the structures at different blurs/focus settings. While the latter yields an optimal base dose, it requires a significant experimental procedure, whereas the former uses a pretty simple experiment but will likely yield a non-optimal base dose due to process effects (e.g., lateral resist development). Here we present a novel method to find the optimum base dose for e-Beam mask exposures that requires only a simple experiment. Surprisingly, the exposure doses required to print features with different densities at the same CD does depend on the process point, adding an error term to the proximity effect correction in case the correction is not aligned to this. This is due to the fact that for a given stack and acceleration voltage, a PEC method will deliver one fixed dose range, whereas the experimentally required dose range depends on the process point chosen. This observation can be used to calibrate the base dose such that it matches the dose range obtained from PEC. Moreover, it can be used to add a new criterion to proximity effect correction – the iso-focal condition - to not only correct for line width (also called critical dimension, CD) linearity and density dependent effect, but to also add immunity to process variations such as focus and blur variations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信