社群主义之后的自由主义

Charles Blattberg
{"title":"社群主义之后的自由主义","authors":"Charles Blattberg","doi":"10.4324/9780203875575.CH9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay I suggest that, following the 'liberal-communitarian' debate in Anglo-American political philosophy in the 1980s, liberal political thought has evolved. The neutralist variant that was the target of communitarian criticisms has embraced a conception of community, and three other variants have become much more prominent. One emphasizes how liberalism should be seen as political ideology among others; a second advances it on the basis of a conception of individual liberty as autonomy; and a third interprets it in terms of value pluralism. All are described and criticized. This essay is a new version of a chapter that appeared in Gerard Delanty and Stephen Turner, eds., International Handbook of Social and Political Theory.","PeriodicalId":308991,"journal":{"name":"Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory","volume":"405 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberalism after communitarianism\",\"authors\":\"Charles Blattberg\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780203875575.CH9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this essay I suggest that, following the 'liberal-communitarian' debate in Anglo-American political philosophy in the 1980s, liberal political thought has evolved. The neutralist variant that was the target of communitarian criticisms has embraced a conception of community, and three other variants have become much more prominent. One emphasizes how liberalism should be seen as political ideology among others; a second advances it on the basis of a conception of individual liberty as autonomy; and a third interprets it in terms of value pluralism. All are described and criticized. This essay is a new version of a chapter that appeared in Gerard Delanty and Stephen Turner, eds., International Handbook of Social and Political Theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308991,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory\",\"volume\":\"405 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875575.CH9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Routledge International Handbook of Contemporary Social and Political Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203875575.CH9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我认为,在20世纪80年代英美政治哲学中的“自由主义-社群主义”辩论之后,自由主义政治思想得到了发展。作为社群主义批评目标的中立主义变体已经包含了社群的概念,另外三种变体已经变得更加突出。一个强调自由主义应该被视为政治意识形态;第二种观点将自由主义建立在个人自由即自治的基础上;第三种观点是从价值多元主义的角度来解释的。所有这些都被描述和批评。这篇文章是杰拉德·德兰蒂和斯蒂芬·特纳编辑的一章的新版本。《国际社会与政治理论手册》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Liberalism after communitarianism
In this essay I suggest that, following the 'liberal-communitarian' debate in Anglo-American political philosophy in the 1980s, liberal political thought has evolved. The neutralist variant that was the target of communitarian criticisms has embraced a conception of community, and three other variants have become much more prominent. One emphasizes how liberalism should be seen as political ideology among others; a second advances it on the basis of a conception of individual liberty as autonomy; and a third interprets it in terms of value pluralism. All are described and criticized. This essay is a new version of a chapter that appeared in Gerard Delanty and Stephen Turner, eds., International Handbook of Social and Political Theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信