在为联邦编写管理策略期间进行冲突分析

J. Barron, S. Davy, B. Jennings
{"title":"在为联邦编写管理策略期间进行冲突分析","authors":"J. Barron, S. Davy, B. Jennings","doi":"10.1109/INM.2011.5990579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We outline a policy conflict analysis process for the analysis of newly specified federation-level policies against previously deployed local/federation policies. The process is generic in the sense that it can be employed by each domain participating in a federation to help maintain the consistency of their local system with that of the federation. The conflict analysis process utilises an information model and associated ontology for representing both the static and dynamic application-specific aspects of the local operating environment and the federation to aid in the detection of potential inconsistencies. It employs two algorithms, one for the selection of previously deployed policies related to the federation-level policy and the other for analysing the returned policies against the federation-level policy. The selection algorithm reduces the number of deployed policies required to be retrieved for analysis against any newly specified federation-level policy, while the conflict analysis algorithm detects inconsistencies relating to the conditional element of a policy rule. We discuss a concrete example in the form of a federated XMPP communication scenario.","PeriodicalId":433520,"journal":{"name":"12th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2011) and Workshops","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conflict analysis during authoring of management policies for federations\",\"authors\":\"J. Barron, S. Davy, B. Jennings\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INM.2011.5990579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We outline a policy conflict analysis process for the analysis of newly specified federation-level policies against previously deployed local/federation policies. The process is generic in the sense that it can be employed by each domain participating in a federation to help maintain the consistency of their local system with that of the federation. The conflict analysis process utilises an information model and associated ontology for representing both the static and dynamic application-specific aspects of the local operating environment and the federation to aid in the detection of potential inconsistencies. It employs two algorithms, one for the selection of previously deployed policies related to the federation-level policy and the other for analysing the returned policies against the federation-level policy. The selection algorithm reduces the number of deployed policies required to be retrieved for analysis against any newly specified federation-level policy, while the conflict analysis algorithm detects inconsistencies relating to the conditional element of a policy rule. We discuss a concrete example in the form of a federated XMPP communication scenario.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"12th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2011) and Workshops\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"12th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2011) and Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INM.2011.5990579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"12th IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management (IM 2011) and Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INM.2011.5990579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

我们概述了一个策略冲突分析流程,用于根据先前部署的本地/联邦策略分析新指定的联邦级策略。该流程是通用的,因为参与联合的每个域都可以使用它来帮助维护其本地系统与联合系统的一致性。冲突分析过程利用信息模型和相关本体来表示本地操作环境和联合的静态和动态特定于应用程序的方面,以帮助检测潜在的不一致。它使用两种算法,一种用于选择先前部署的与联邦级策略相关的策略,另一种用于根据联邦级策略分析返回的策略。选择算法减少了针对任何新指定的联邦级策略进行分析所需检索的已部署策略的数量,而冲突分析算法则检测与策略规则的条件元素相关的不一致性。我们以联邦XMPP通信场景的形式讨论一个具体示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conflict analysis during authoring of management policies for federations
We outline a policy conflict analysis process for the analysis of newly specified federation-level policies against previously deployed local/federation policies. The process is generic in the sense that it can be employed by each domain participating in a federation to help maintain the consistency of their local system with that of the federation. The conflict analysis process utilises an information model and associated ontology for representing both the static and dynamic application-specific aspects of the local operating environment and the federation to aid in the detection of potential inconsistencies. It employs two algorithms, one for the selection of previously deployed policies related to the federation-level policy and the other for analysing the returned policies against the federation-level policy. The selection algorithm reduces the number of deployed policies required to be retrieved for analysis against any newly specified federation-level policy, while the conflict analysis algorithm detects inconsistencies relating to the conditional element of a policy rule. We discuss a concrete example in the form of a federated XMPP communication scenario.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信