外语教学中方法论能力的水平

R. Martynova, S. Bodnar
{"title":"外语教学中方法论能力的水平","authors":"R. Martynova, S. Bodnar","doi":"10.32589/2412-9283.37.2022.272881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notions “methodological competence” and “methodological competency” are differentiated in the scientific literature but their use in the methodological works is not always appropriate according to their essence. There is no gradation of these terms to different levels depending on knowledge, skills and abilities in teaching if to speak about people having different scientific and methodological potential. Therefore, it brings to the necessary to determine the level of methodological competence/competency of pedagogues who teach foreign languages in preschool, secondary, higher educational institutions and scholars-didacts and methodists. Due to the limited number of pages of a scholar paper only the problem of “methodological competence” differentiation is highlighted in the presented work. Purpose is to determine the levels of methodological competence of foreign language teachers with different scientific and methodological potential. Methods. Literature review on the topic of the research, comparative analysis of different definitions of methodological competence, generalization of the scholars-didacts and methodists’ experience. Results. This study analyses the notion “methodological competence” and determines its definition. Three levels of methodological competence have been developed and substantiated. The precise distinction between three levels has been defined and described taking into account the content of seven links of the teaching process introduced by us in the work. The first level of methodical competence correlates with the first level of language and speech competences (Martynova, Bodnar, 2022), as well as with the ability of calendar and lesson planning; the second correlates with the second level of language and speech competences, as well as with the ability to plana foreign language teaching process during the academic year and semesters, with the subsequent composing professional educational programs and syllabus; the third correlates with the third level of language and speech competences, as well as with the ability to plan foreign language self-study process, both in language and communicative and speech aspects, to the possibility of students creating their own speech products in a foreign language. Conclusion. It has been concluded that three established levels of methodological competence will clarify the essence of this concept, detail its components and become objective characteristics of educators’ methodological knowledge and skills. ","PeriodicalId":273615,"journal":{"name":"Vìsnik KNLU. Serìâ “Psihologìâ ta pedagogìka” / Visnyk KNLU. Series \"Pedagogy and Psychology\"","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levels of methodological competence in foreign language teaching\",\"authors\":\"R. Martynova, S. Bodnar\",\"doi\":\"10.32589/2412-9283.37.2022.272881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The notions “methodological competence” and “methodological competency” are differentiated in the scientific literature but their use in the methodological works is not always appropriate according to their essence. There is no gradation of these terms to different levels depending on knowledge, skills and abilities in teaching if to speak about people having different scientific and methodological potential. Therefore, it brings to the necessary to determine the level of methodological competence/competency of pedagogues who teach foreign languages in preschool, secondary, higher educational institutions and scholars-didacts and methodists. Due to the limited number of pages of a scholar paper only the problem of “methodological competence” differentiation is highlighted in the presented work. Purpose is to determine the levels of methodological competence of foreign language teachers with different scientific and methodological potential. Methods. Literature review on the topic of the research, comparative analysis of different definitions of methodological competence, generalization of the scholars-didacts and methodists’ experience. Results. This study analyses the notion “methodological competence” and determines its definition. Three levels of methodological competence have been developed and substantiated. The precise distinction between three levels has been defined and described taking into account the content of seven links of the teaching process introduced by us in the work. The first level of methodical competence correlates with the first level of language and speech competences (Martynova, Bodnar, 2022), as well as with the ability of calendar and lesson planning; the second correlates with the second level of language and speech competences, as well as with the ability to plana foreign language teaching process during the academic year and semesters, with the subsequent composing professional educational programs and syllabus; the third correlates with the third level of language and speech competences, as well as with the ability to plan foreign language self-study process, both in language and communicative and speech aspects, to the possibility of students creating their own speech products in a foreign language. Conclusion. It has been concluded that three established levels of methodological competence will clarify the essence of this concept, detail its components and become objective characteristics of educators’ methodological knowledge and skills. \",\"PeriodicalId\":273615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vìsnik KNLU. Serìâ “Psihologìâ ta pedagogìka” / Visnyk KNLU. Series \\\"Pedagogy and Psychology\\\"\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vìsnik KNLU. Serìâ “Psihologìâ ta pedagogìka” / Visnyk KNLU. Series \\\"Pedagogy and Psychology\\\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32589/2412-9283.37.2022.272881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vìsnik KNLU. Serìâ “Psihologìâ ta pedagogìka” / Visnyk KNLU. Series \"Pedagogy and Psychology\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32589/2412-9283.37.2022.272881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在科学文献中,“方法论能力”和“方法论能力”这两个概念是有区别的,但在方法论著作中,它们的使用并不总是符合其本质。这些术语没有根据知识、技能和教学能力的不同而有不同的等级,如果谈到具有不同科学和方法潜力的人。因此,有必要确定在学前、中等和高等教育机构教授外语的教师以及学者-教师和循道宗的方法能力水平。由于一篇学者论文的页数有限,本文只强调了“方法论能力”的区分问题。目的是确定具有不同科学和方法潜力的外语教师的方法能力水平。方法。对研究主题进行文献综述,对方法论能力的不同定义进行比较分析,并对学者-教育者和卫理公会教徒的经验进行概括。结果。本文分析了“方法论能力”的概念,确定了方法论能力的定义。方法能力的三个层次已经发展并得到证实。考虑到我们在工作中介绍的教学过程的七个环节的内容,对三个层次之间的精确区分进行了定义和描述。第一层次的系统能力与第一层次的语言和言语能力相关(Martynova, Bodnar, 2022),也与日历和课程计划的能力相关;第二部分涉及语言和言语能力的二级水平,以及在学年和学期中规划外语教学过程的能力,以及随后编写专业教育计划和教学大纲的能力;第三个与语言和言语能力的第三个层次有关,也与计划外语自学过程的能力有关,包括语言和交际和言语方面,以及学生用外语创造自己的言语产品的可能性。结论。结论是,三个既定的方法论能力水平将澄清这一概念的本质,详细说明其组成部分,并成为教育工作者方法论知识和技能的客观特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Levels of methodological competence in foreign language teaching
The notions “methodological competence” and “methodological competency” are differentiated in the scientific literature but their use in the methodological works is not always appropriate according to their essence. There is no gradation of these terms to different levels depending on knowledge, skills and abilities in teaching if to speak about people having different scientific and methodological potential. Therefore, it brings to the necessary to determine the level of methodological competence/competency of pedagogues who teach foreign languages in preschool, secondary, higher educational institutions and scholars-didacts and methodists. Due to the limited number of pages of a scholar paper only the problem of “methodological competence” differentiation is highlighted in the presented work. Purpose is to determine the levels of methodological competence of foreign language teachers with different scientific and methodological potential. Methods. Literature review on the topic of the research, comparative analysis of different definitions of methodological competence, generalization of the scholars-didacts and methodists’ experience. Results. This study analyses the notion “methodological competence” and determines its definition. Three levels of methodological competence have been developed and substantiated. The precise distinction between three levels has been defined and described taking into account the content of seven links of the teaching process introduced by us in the work. The first level of methodical competence correlates with the first level of language and speech competences (Martynova, Bodnar, 2022), as well as with the ability of calendar and lesson planning; the second correlates with the second level of language and speech competences, as well as with the ability to plana foreign language teaching process during the academic year and semesters, with the subsequent composing professional educational programs and syllabus; the third correlates with the third level of language and speech competences, as well as with the ability to plan foreign language self-study process, both in language and communicative and speech aspects, to the possibility of students creating their own speech products in a foreign language. Conclusion. It has been concluded that three established levels of methodological competence will clarify the essence of this concept, detail its components and become objective characteristics of educators’ methodological knowledge and skills. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信