{"title":"战略力量","authors":"J. Schlesinger","doi":"10.1080/04597226208459689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The long-term and quite well-known factor is that, over many years, the Soviets have been steadily closing the gap in nuclear capabilities between them and us. For a period of time prior to 1960, the United States had a virtual nuclear monopoly. By 1960, it was perceived that our monopoly advantage would ebb; and, in fact, it not only began to ebb, but, by 1966-67, the soviet Union had a very substantial intercontinental counter-deterrent. During the early 1960s, it was stated quite clearly by President Kennedy--and also by a large majority of Americans in both parties--that the United States needed alternatives other than suicide or surrender, that it needed options which did not imply immediate escalation to major nuclear war.","PeriodicalId":296860,"journal":{"name":"Russia’s Military Modernisation","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategic forces\",\"authors\":\"J. Schlesinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/04597226208459689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The long-term and quite well-known factor is that, over many years, the Soviets have been steadily closing the gap in nuclear capabilities between them and us. For a period of time prior to 1960, the United States had a virtual nuclear monopoly. By 1960, it was perceived that our monopoly advantage would ebb; and, in fact, it not only began to ebb, but, by 1966-67, the soviet Union had a very substantial intercontinental counter-deterrent. During the early 1960s, it was stated quite clearly by President Kennedy--and also by a large majority of Americans in both parties--that the United States needed alternatives other than suicide or surrender, that it needed options which did not imply immediate escalation to major nuclear war.\",\"PeriodicalId\":296860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russia’s Military Modernisation\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russia’s Military Modernisation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/04597226208459689\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russia’s Military Modernisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/04597226208459689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The long-term and quite well-known factor is that, over many years, the Soviets have been steadily closing the gap in nuclear capabilities between them and us. For a period of time prior to 1960, the United States had a virtual nuclear monopoly. By 1960, it was perceived that our monopoly advantage would ebb; and, in fact, it not only began to ebb, but, by 1966-67, the soviet Union had a very substantial intercontinental counter-deterrent. During the early 1960s, it was stated quite clearly by President Kennedy--and also by a large majority of Americans in both parties--that the United States needed alternatives other than suicide or surrender, that it needed options which did not imply immediate escalation to major nuclear war.