Marijana Juralovič
{"title":"Technologijų dalyko turinio kaita","authors":"Marijana Juralovič","doi":"10.15823/su.2018.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The creation is an important reflection of internal and external world of pupil, expression of his or her individuality. When creating the child consciously or unconsciously expresses his or her feelings, an attitude towards the surrounding world, and what lies within the child: his or her feelings, experiences, thoughts, wishes, needs, objectives, dreams and fantasies. Thus, the lessons of technology form the perfect environment to stimulate the creative origins of pupils and develop their creativity. The vertical questionnaire survey has been carried out in May – June 2017, in order to clarify the issues of technology subject while developing the technological competencies of different genders (boys and girls) having a direct impact on personal development, to find out the most evaluated programme of technology subject by pupils and the effect of learning according to one or another programme in a mixed or non-mixed group to learning motivation and wish to learn technology. The pupils of 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th grades of Vilnius city schools have participated in survey. Total number of 186 pupils have been interviewed. The questions in questionnaire are related to real situation of technology subject in pupil‘s opinion while learning in a mixed or non-mixed group. 112 girls and 74 boys have participated in survey. After having analysed the common programmes of basic technological education, it was found out that definition – “suitable for all pupils regardless of gender“ showed many didactic and psychological gaps of the programme, as well as serious objections to reality. This definition clearly intersects with the purpose of subject, objective, tasks and didactic provisions of technological education. The programme also lacks attention to pupil‘s growth as healthy personality. Therefore, in order to educate technologically literate, curious, thinking, creative, proactive, responsible and comprehensively healthy personality, it is necessary to consider the natural qualities of pupils, development of boys and girls age phases, psychological and physiologic meaning, flights and abilities, create the opportunities for all pupils (considering the gender) to learn various technologies. The carried out survey showed that the textile programme is the least valued by pupils (18,8%); the programme of constructional materials is also low valued (29,6%). The relatively large part of pupils (40,3%) think that learning motivation is stronger and the results are better during the learning of technology in a non-mixed group. Equal distribution of all programmes without dividing boys and girls by their gender, as specified in common programmes, is not logical. The girls need more time to learn in textile division, in order to be more feminine. Boys need to spend more time in the division of construction materials in order to become more masculine. The assessment of various technological programmes (nutrition, construction materials, textiles) in pupils‘ opinion showed that the natural qualities of boys (as men) and girls (as women) are educated only partially. Therefore, the pupil is not educated as personality, since his or her gender is not considered. These are big obstacles to plan and organize the education process of technology subject correctly. Therefore, it is recommended to reform the education content by forming the provisions of gender equality in the education process of technology subject. It is required to take into account the needs and interests of boys and girls differentially but symmetrically. Schools should include the definition of household culture into the common programme of technology basic education, education process and change the name of subject to “Household culture and technologies“ directly reflecting the objective to educate a pupil as comprehensively healthy personality. Keywords: creativity, general programs of technology subject in a basic education, self-development according to gender, learning motivation.","PeriodicalId":303026,"journal":{"name":"Socialinis ugdymas","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialinis ugdymas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15823/su.2018.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

创作是学生内心世界和外在世界的重要反映,是学生个性的表现。在创作时,孩子有意识或无意识地表达了他或她的感受,对周围世界的态度,以及孩子内心的东西:他或她的感受、经历、思想、愿望、需求、目标、梦想和幻想。因此,技术课程为激发学生的创造本源和发展他们的创造力提供了完美的环境。垂直问卷调查已于2017年5月至6月进行,为了澄清技术学科的问题,同时发展不同性别(男孩和女孩)的技术能力对个人发展有直接影响,找出学生评价最高的技术学科计划,以及根据混合或非混合小组的一个或另一个计划学习对学习动机和希望学习技术的影响。维尔纽斯市学校六年级、七年级、八年级和九年级的学生参加了调查。共有186名学生接受了采访。问卷中的问题与学生在混合或非混合群体中学习时所认为的技术学科的真实情况有关。112名女生和74名男生参与了调查。在分析了常见的基础技术教育方案后,我们发现“适合所有学生,不分性别”的定义显示了该方案在教学和心理上的许多差距,以及对现实的严重反对。这一定义明显地与技术教育的主体目的、目标、任务和教学规定相交叉。该计划也缺乏对学生健康人格成长的关注。因此,为了教育具有技术素养、好奇、思考、创造性、积极主动、负责任和全面健康的人格,有必要考虑学生的自然素质、男孩和女孩年龄阶段的发展、心理和生理意义、飞行和能力,为所有学生(考虑性别)创造学习各种技术的机会。进行的调查显示,纺织课程是学生最不重视的(18.8%);建筑材料项目的价值也很低(29.6%)。相对较大一部分小学生(40.3%)认为非混合组在技术学习过程中学习动机更强,学习效果更好。如共同方案所规定的那样,不按性别划分男女生而平等分配所有方案是不合乎逻辑的。女孩们需要更多的时间来学习纺织课,这样才能更有女人味。男孩需要花更多的时间在建筑材料部门,以便变得更有男子气概。对学生认为的各种技术方案(营养、建筑材料、纺织品)的评估表明,男孩(作为男子)和女孩(作为妇女)的自然素质只得到部分教育。因此,学生没有受到人格教育,因为他或她的性别没有被考虑。这些都是正确规划和组织技术学科教育过程的重大障碍。因此,建议对教育内容进行改革,在技术学科的教育过程中形成性别平等的规定。需要对男孩和女孩的需要和兴趣进行不同但对称的考虑。学校应将家庭文化的定义纳入技术基础教育的共同方案、教育过程中,并将学科名称改为“家庭文化与技术”,直接体现培养学生全面健康人格的目标。关键词:创造力;基础教育技术学科通识课程;性别自我发展;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technologijų dalyko turinio kaita
The creation is an important reflection of internal and external world of pupil, expression of his or her individuality. When creating the child consciously or unconsciously expresses his or her feelings, an attitude towards the surrounding world, and what lies within the child: his or her feelings, experiences, thoughts, wishes, needs, objectives, dreams and fantasies. Thus, the lessons of technology form the perfect environment to stimulate the creative origins of pupils and develop their creativity. The vertical questionnaire survey has been carried out in May – June 2017, in order to clarify the issues of technology subject while developing the technological competencies of different genders (boys and girls) having a direct impact on personal development, to find out the most evaluated programme of technology subject by pupils and the effect of learning according to one or another programme in a mixed or non-mixed group to learning motivation and wish to learn technology. The pupils of 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th grades of Vilnius city schools have participated in survey. Total number of 186 pupils have been interviewed. The questions in questionnaire are related to real situation of technology subject in pupil‘s opinion while learning in a mixed or non-mixed group. 112 girls and 74 boys have participated in survey. After having analysed the common programmes of basic technological education, it was found out that definition – “suitable for all pupils regardless of gender“ showed many didactic and psychological gaps of the programme, as well as serious objections to reality. This definition clearly intersects with the purpose of subject, objective, tasks and didactic provisions of technological education. The programme also lacks attention to pupil‘s growth as healthy personality. Therefore, in order to educate technologically literate, curious, thinking, creative, proactive, responsible and comprehensively healthy personality, it is necessary to consider the natural qualities of pupils, development of boys and girls age phases, psychological and physiologic meaning, flights and abilities, create the opportunities for all pupils (considering the gender) to learn various technologies. The carried out survey showed that the textile programme is the least valued by pupils (18,8%); the programme of constructional materials is also low valued (29,6%). The relatively large part of pupils (40,3%) think that learning motivation is stronger and the results are better during the learning of technology in a non-mixed group. Equal distribution of all programmes without dividing boys and girls by their gender, as specified in common programmes, is not logical. The girls need more time to learn in textile division, in order to be more feminine. Boys need to spend more time in the division of construction materials in order to become more masculine. The assessment of various technological programmes (nutrition, construction materials, textiles) in pupils‘ opinion showed that the natural qualities of boys (as men) and girls (as women) are educated only partially. Therefore, the pupil is not educated as personality, since his or her gender is not considered. These are big obstacles to plan and organize the education process of technology subject correctly. Therefore, it is recommended to reform the education content by forming the provisions of gender equality in the education process of technology subject. It is required to take into account the needs and interests of boys and girls differentially but symmetrically. Schools should include the definition of household culture into the common programme of technology basic education, education process and change the name of subject to “Household culture and technologies“ directly reflecting the objective to educate a pupil as comprehensively healthy personality. Keywords: creativity, general programs of technology subject in a basic education, self-development according to gender, learning motivation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信