基于触发条件的测试生成,用于查找安全漏洞

Jie Liu, Qiang Wei, Qingxian Wang, Tao Guo
{"title":"基于触发条件的测试生成,用于查找安全漏洞","authors":"Jie Liu, Qiang Wei, Qingxian Wang, Tao Guo","doi":"10.1109/ICSAI.2012.6223228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software vulnerabilities become methods by which an attacker can take control of the victim's system, and those critical bugs cluster in dangerous spot codes. However, fuzz testing provides low code coverage and serious security bugs may be missed potentially, while symbolic execution based testing encounters path explosion and bug trigger problem. To deal with the security issue above, we highlight two kinds of dangerous spot codes which mostly likely to trigger buffer overflows at runtime: dangerous functions and instructions. We define the conditions on which dangerous spot code can trigger a bug: input-dependent operand, feasible execution path, and trigger conditions. Then we give algorithm for trigger point directed search in order to find the shortest feasible path in CFG, and formalize the trigger conditions for integer overflow, string buffer overflow, array out of bound and division by zero bugs. At last we evaluate the implementation in four benchmark programs in Ubuntu Linux, showing that our method improves the coverage rate of trigger point and trigger rate of overflows efficiently.","PeriodicalId":164945,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI2012)","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trigger condition based test generation for finding security bugs\",\"authors\":\"Jie Liu, Qiang Wei, Qingxian Wang, Tao Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSAI.2012.6223228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software vulnerabilities become methods by which an attacker can take control of the victim's system, and those critical bugs cluster in dangerous spot codes. However, fuzz testing provides low code coverage and serious security bugs may be missed potentially, while symbolic execution based testing encounters path explosion and bug trigger problem. To deal with the security issue above, we highlight two kinds of dangerous spot codes which mostly likely to trigger buffer overflows at runtime: dangerous functions and instructions. We define the conditions on which dangerous spot code can trigger a bug: input-dependent operand, feasible execution path, and trigger conditions. Then we give algorithm for trigger point directed search in order to find the shortest feasible path in CFG, and formalize the trigger conditions for integer overflow, string buffer overflow, array out of bound and division by zero bugs. At last we evaluate the implementation in four benchmark programs in Ubuntu Linux, showing that our method improves the coverage rate of trigger point and trigger rate of overflows efficiently.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI2012)\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI2012)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSAI.2012.6223228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI2012)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSAI.2012.6223228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

软件漏洞成为攻击者控制受害者系统的方法,而这些关键漏洞聚集在危险的点代码中。然而,模糊测试提供了较低的代码覆盖率,并且可能会遗漏严重的安全漏洞,而基于符号执行的测试则会遇到路径爆炸和漏洞触发问题。为了处理上面的安全问题,我们强调了两种最可能在运行时触发缓冲区溢出的危险点代码:危险函数和指令。我们定义了危险的点代码触发错误的条件:依赖输入的操作数、可行的执行路径和触发条件。然后给出了在CFG中寻找最短可行路径的触发点定向搜索算法,并形式化了整数溢出、字符串缓冲区溢出、数组越界和除零错误的触发条件。最后,我们在Ubuntu Linux的四个基准程序中对实现进行了评估,结果表明我们的方法有效地提高了触发点覆盖率和溢出触发率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trigger condition based test generation for finding security bugs
Software vulnerabilities become methods by which an attacker can take control of the victim's system, and those critical bugs cluster in dangerous spot codes. However, fuzz testing provides low code coverage and serious security bugs may be missed potentially, while symbolic execution based testing encounters path explosion and bug trigger problem. To deal with the security issue above, we highlight two kinds of dangerous spot codes which mostly likely to trigger buffer overflows at runtime: dangerous functions and instructions. We define the conditions on which dangerous spot code can trigger a bug: input-dependent operand, feasible execution path, and trigger conditions. Then we give algorithm for trigger point directed search in order to find the shortest feasible path in CFG, and formalize the trigger conditions for integer overflow, string buffer overflow, array out of bound and division by zero bugs. At last we evaluate the implementation in four benchmark programs in Ubuntu Linux, showing that our method improves the coverage rate of trigger point and trigger rate of overflows efficiently.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信