{"title":"通过锡锡(合作社贷款实况研究)转移资金","authors":"Sri Eni Julianita Koto","doi":"10.35447/jph.v2i1.268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The state of liquidation of each bank and non-bank financial institution is strongly affected by social and economic conditions, both on a national and international scale. In order for lending (loans) to continue to run, it is known that the accounts receivable transfer agency is known as cessie. Based on Article 613 of the Civil Code, it is stated that the delivery of receivables in the name and other bodily objects is carried out by making an authentic deed or deed under the hands of which the rights to property are delegated to others. The delivery of these receivables has no effect on the debtor before delivery is notified and approved in writing or acknowledged by the Debtor / Borrower. The existence of an authentic deed or underhand deed is needed as a way of transferring or transferring ownership rights over the receivables in question from the creditor to a third party. The role and authority of a Notary in the making of cessie documents, as regulated in the notary office law, namely \"Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in the notary office law. Receivables transferred by cessie are a claims held by creditors against their debtors which are claims on behalf of. In principle, a bill in the name shows clearly and definitely about the creditor who is entitled to receive payment. This occurred in the transfer of accounts receivable between the Indosurya Savings and Loans Cooperative (Old Creditors) and Indosurya Inti Finance (As the new creditors). The transfer of accounts receivable that occurs between the Indosurya Savings and Loans Cooperative and Indosurya Inti Finance has a legal effect on the collateral binding that has been installed by the mortgage and has legal consequences for the borrower / debtor of the Indosurya savings and loan cooperative who switches from the Cooperative Borrower who is subject to the regulations of the Ministry of Cooperatives and Small Business and Medium to become Indosurya Inti finance debtors who are subject to the regulations of the Financial Services Authority.The problems in this research, among others: How is the transfer of accounts receivable by cessie and the consequences for guarantees of mortgage rights, How is the implementation of collection of accounts receivable (cessie) made with a notary deed, How is the implementation of cessie in indosurya savings and loan cooperatives. The problems in this study include: How is the transfer of accounts receivable by cessie and the consequences for guarantees of mortgage rights, How is the implementation of collection of accounts receivable (cessie) made with a notary deed, How is the implementation of cessie in indosurya savings and loan cooperatives. This research uses legal certainty theory and legal protection theory. This research uses normative legal research methods that are descriptive in nature, the data sources of this study can be divided into primary data and secondary data. Primary data was conducted in order to obtain field research through interviews with informants. Library research is carried out by reading books, journals, and laws and regulations. The results showed that. The transfer of accounts receivable (Cessie) between the old creditor and the new creditor which is guaranteed by the mortgage right causes the mortgage to also be transferred. The law states that if the receivables secured by mortgage rights are transferred due to cessie, subrogation of mortgage rights is also transferred due to the law. The role of a notary in the production of a cessie deed is the same as that of other deeds made by a notary. As a deed made before / made by a Notary Public has Construction, namely the Authority, requirements and procedures that must be carried out by the Notary Public. . The implementation of Accounts Receivable Transfer (Cessie) between the Indosurya Savings and Loan Cooperative and Indosurya Inti Finance has legal consequences for both the borrower and the new creditor (cessionaris). The implementation of the cessie has not been carried out as it should be regulated in the provisions of the law. Accounts receivable transfer is only carried out in an operational system, debtor loans are transferred to the operational system of Indosurya Inti Finance. Accont management (loans) is still maintained by the Indosurya Savings and Loans Cooperative. this causes losses incurred on the borrower (Debtor) and results in legal uncertainty. Article 16 of the mortgage rights law confirms that receivables are transferred due to cessie, and the mortgage rights are transferred due to law to new creditors. In the implementation of the cessie between Indosurya savings and loan cooperatives and the core indosurya finance, the mortgage rights have not been registered again. The deviation from the practice of implementing this cessie is not mentioned in the law, namely Article 16 of Law No. 4 of 1996. In juridical terms, the absence of the transfer of the security right causes the cessei agreement to be null and void or it is assumed that the transfer of accounts receivable has not yet occurred. In a sociological view, the non-registration of mortgage rights does not make the cessie cancel. The agreement has no material rights, because material rights have the principle of publicity. Publicity principle is a security right that must be registered. So that creditors change from preferred creditors to become concurrent creditors","PeriodicalId":302535,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Perspektif Hukum","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pengalihan Kreditur Melalui Ceasie (Studi Kasus Pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Indosurya)\",\"authors\":\"Sri Eni Julianita Koto\",\"doi\":\"10.35447/jph.v2i1.268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The state of liquidation of each bank and non-bank financial institution is strongly affected by social and economic conditions, both on a national and international scale. In order for lending (loans) to continue to run, it is known that the accounts receivable transfer agency is known as cessie. Based on Article 613 of the Civil Code, it is stated that the delivery of receivables in the name and other bodily objects is carried out by making an authentic deed or deed under the hands of which the rights to property are delegated to others. The delivery of these receivables has no effect on the debtor before delivery is notified and approved in writing or acknowledged by the Debtor / Borrower. The existence of an authentic deed or underhand deed is needed as a way of transferring or transferring ownership rights over the receivables in question from the creditor to a third party. The role and authority of a Notary in the making of cessie documents, as regulated in the notary office law, namely \\\"Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in the notary office law. Receivables transferred by cessie are a claims held by creditors against their debtors which are claims on behalf of. In principle, a bill in the name shows clearly and definitely about the creditor who is entitled to receive payment. This occurred in the transfer of accounts receivable between the Indosurya Savings and Loans Cooperative (Old Creditors) and Indosurya Inti Finance (As the new creditors). The transfer of accounts receivable that occurs between the Indosurya Savings and Loans Cooperative and Indosurya Inti Finance has a legal effect on the collateral binding that has been installed by the mortgage and has legal consequences for the borrower / debtor of the Indosurya savings and loan cooperative who switches from the Cooperative Borrower who is subject to the regulations of the Ministry of Cooperatives and Small Business and Medium to become Indosurya Inti finance debtors who are subject to the regulations of the Financial Services Authority.The problems in this research, among others: How is the transfer of accounts receivable by cessie and the consequences for guarantees of mortgage rights, How is the implementation of collection of accounts receivable (cessie) made with a notary deed, How is the implementation of cessie in indosurya savings and loan cooperatives. The problems in this study include: How is the transfer of accounts receivable by cessie and the consequences for guarantees of mortgage rights, How is the implementation of collection of accounts receivable (cessie) made with a notary deed, How is the implementation of cessie in indosurya savings and loan cooperatives. This research uses legal certainty theory and legal protection theory. This research uses normative legal research methods that are descriptive in nature, the data sources of this study can be divided into primary data and secondary data. Primary data was conducted in order to obtain field research through interviews with informants. Library research is carried out by reading books, journals, and laws and regulations. The results showed that. The transfer of accounts receivable (Cessie) between the old creditor and the new creditor which is guaranteed by the mortgage right causes the mortgage to also be transferred. The law states that if the receivables secured by mortgage rights are transferred due to cessie, subrogation of mortgage rights is also transferred due to the law. The role of a notary in the production of a cessie deed is the same as that of other deeds made by a notary. As a deed made before / made by a Notary Public has Construction, namely the Authority, requirements and procedures that must be carried out by the Notary Public. . The implementation of Accounts Receivable Transfer (Cessie) between the Indosurya Savings and Loan Cooperative and Indosurya Inti Finance has legal consequences for both the borrower and the new creditor (cessionaris). The implementation of the cessie has not been carried out as it should be regulated in the provisions of the law. Accounts receivable transfer is only carried out in an operational system, debtor loans are transferred to the operational system of Indosurya Inti Finance. Accont management (loans) is still maintained by the Indosurya Savings and Loans Cooperative. this causes losses incurred on the borrower (Debtor) and results in legal uncertainty. Article 16 of the mortgage rights law confirms that receivables are transferred due to cessie, and the mortgage rights are transferred due to law to new creditors. In the implementation of the cessie between Indosurya savings and loan cooperatives and the core indosurya finance, the mortgage rights have not been registered again. The deviation from the practice of implementing this cessie is not mentioned in the law, namely Article 16 of Law No. 4 of 1996. In juridical terms, the absence of the transfer of the security right causes the cessei agreement to be null and void or it is assumed that the transfer of accounts receivable has not yet occurred. In a sociological view, the non-registration of mortgage rights does not make the cessie cancel. The agreement has no material rights, because material rights have the principle of publicity. Publicity principle is a security right that must be registered. So that creditors change from preferred creditors to become concurrent creditors\",\"PeriodicalId\":302535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Perspektif Hukum\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Perspektif Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35447/jph.v2i1.268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Perspektif Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35447/jph.v2i1.268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
每家银行和非银行金融机构的清算状况都受到国内和国际社会和经济条件的强烈影响。为了使借贷(贷款)继续运行,众所周知,应收账款转账机构被称为cessie。根据《民法典》第613条,应收款的名义和其他实物的交付是通过制作一份或一份真实的契据来实现的,该契据将财产权利委托给他人。在债务人/借款人以书面通知并批准或确认交付之前,这些应收款项的交付对债务人没有影响。作为将有关应收款项的所有权从债权人转移到第三方的一种方式,需要存在一份真实的契据或暗中的契据。《公证法》规定了公证员在制作真实文件中的作用和权力,即“公证员是具有制作真实文件的权力并具有公证法所称其他权力的公职人员”。应收帐款是债权人对债务人持有的一种债权,债务人代表债权人提出的债权。原则上,票据的名称清楚明确地表明有权接受付款的债权人。这种情况发生在Indosurya储蓄贷款合作社(旧债权人)和Indosurya Inti Finance(作为新债权人)之间的应收账款转移中。发生在Indosurya储蓄和贷款合作社和Indosurya Inti Finance之间的应收账款转让对抵押所安装的抵押品具有法律效力,并对Indosurya储蓄和贷款合作社的借款人/债务人产生法律后果,这些借款人/债务人从受合作社和中小企业部规定约束的合作借款人转变为Indosurya Inti Finance债务人受金融服务管理局的规管。本文研究的问题包括:应收账款的转让如何进行以及抵押权担保的后果;应收账款的催收如何通过公证契据实现;储蓄贷款合作社如何实现应收账款。本文研究的问题包括:应收账款的转让如何进行以及抵押权担保的后果;应收账款的催收如何通过公证契据来实施;本研究运用了法律确定性理论和法律保护理论。本研究采用规范性的描述性法律研究方法,本研究的数据来源可分为一手数据和二手数据。通过与举报人的访谈,收集了原始数据,以便进行实地研究。图书馆研究是通过阅读书籍、期刊和法律法规来进行的。结果表明。由抵押权担保的应收账款在旧债权人和新债权人之间的转移导致抵押权也被转移。法律规定,以抵押权为担保的应收款因物权变更而转让的,抵押权的代位求偿权也依法转让。公证人在制作不动产契据中的作用,与公证人制作其他契据的作用相同。由于公证员之前/由公证员制作的契约具有结构,即授权,要求和程序,必须由公证员执行。Indosurya储蓄贷款合作社和Indosurya Inti Finance之间的应收账款转让(Cessie)的实施对借款人和新债权人(cessionaris)都有法律后果。该法案的实施没有得到执行,因为它应该在法律条款中加以规定。应收账款转移只在业务系统中进行,债务人贷款转移到Indosurya Inti Finance的业务系统中。账户管理(贷款)仍由Indosurya储蓄贷款合作社维持。这会给借款人(债务人)造成损失,并导致法律上的不确定性。《抵押权法》第16条规定,应收款项因违约而转让,抵押权依法转让给新的债权人。在印尼储蓄贷款合作社与核心印尼金融之间的交接中,抵押权没有重新登记。法律,即1996年第4号法律第16条,没有提到偏离执行这一公约的做法。 在法律上,担保权未转让,则担保协议无效或推定应收账款未发生转让。从社会学的角度看,抵押权不登记并不能使抵押权取消。协议没有物质权利,因为物质权利具有公共性原则。公示原则是一项必须登记的担保权利。这样债权人就从优先债权人变成了共同债权人
Pengalihan Kreditur Melalui Ceasie (Studi Kasus Pada Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Indosurya)
The state of liquidation of each bank and non-bank financial institution is strongly affected by social and economic conditions, both on a national and international scale. In order for lending (loans) to continue to run, it is known that the accounts receivable transfer agency is known as cessie. Based on Article 613 of the Civil Code, it is stated that the delivery of receivables in the name and other bodily objects is carried out by making an authentic deed or deed under the hands of which the rights to property are delegated to others. The delivery of these receivables has no effect on the debtor before delivery is notified and approved in writing or acknowledged by the Debtor / Borrower. The existence of an authentic deed or underhand deed is needed as a way of transferring or transferring ownership rights over the receivables in question from the creditor to a third party. The role and authority of a Notary in the making of cessie documents, as regulated in the notary office law, namely "Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds and has other powers as referred to in the notary office law. Receivables transferred by cessie are a claims held by creditors against their debtors which are claims on behalf of. In principle, a bill in the name shows clearly and definitely about the creditor who is entitled to receive payment. This occurred in the transfer of accounts receivable between the Indosurya Savings and Loans Cooperative (Old Creditors) and Indosurya Inti Finance (As the new creditors). The transfer of accounts receivable that occurs between the Indosurya Savings and Loans Cooperative and Indosurya Inti Finance has a legal effect on the collateral binding that has been installed by the mortgage and has legal consequences for the borrower / debtor of the Indosurya savings and loan cooperative who switches from the Cooperative Borrower who is subject to the regulations of the Ministry of Cooperatives and Small Business and Medium to become Indosurya Inti finance debtors who are subject to the regulations of the Financial Services Authority.The problems in this research, among others: How is the transfer of accounts receivable by cessie and the consequences for guarantees of mortgage rights, How is the implementation of collection of accounts receivable (cessie) made with a notary deed, How is the implementation of cessie in indosurya savings and loan cooperatives. The problems in this study include: How is the transfer of accounts receivable by cessie and the consequences for guarantees of mortgage rights, How is the implementation of collection of accounts receivable (cessie) made with a notary deed, How is the implementation of cessie in indosurya savings and loan cooperatives. This research uses legal certainty theory and legal protection theory. This research uses normative legal research methods that are descriptive in nature, the data sources of this study can be divided into primary data and secondary data. Primary data was conducted in order to obtain field research through interviews with informants. Library research is carried out by reading books, journals, and laws and regulations. The results showed that. The transfer of accounts receivable (Cessie) between the old creditor and the new creditor which is guaranteed by the mortgage right causes the mortgage to also be transferred. The law states that if the receivables secured by mortgage rights are transferred due to cessie, subrogation of mortgage rights is also transferred due to the law. The role of a notary in the production of a cessie deed is the same as that of other deeds made by a notary. As a deed made before / made by a Notary Public has Construction, namely the Authority, requirements and procedures that must be carried out by the Notary Public. . The implementation of Accounts Receivable Transfer (Cessie) between the Indosurya Savings and Loan Cooperative and Indosurya Inti Finance has legal consequences for both the borrower and the new creditor (cessionaris). The implementation of the cessie has not been carried out as it should be regulated in the provisions of the law. Accounts receivable transfer is only carried out in an operational system, debtor loans are transferred to the operational system of Indosurya Inti Finance. Accont management (loans) is still maintained by the Indosurya Savings and Loans Cooperative. this causes losses incurred on the borrower (Debtor) and results in legal uncertainty. Article 16 of the mortgage rights law confirms that receivables are transferred due to cessie, and the mortgage rights are transferred due to law to new creditors. In the implementation of the cessie between Indosurya savings and loan cooperatives and the core indosurya finance, the mortgage rights have not been registered again. The deviation from the practice of implementing this cessie is not mentioned in the law, namely Article 16 of Law No. 4 of 1996. In juridical terms, the absence of the transfer of the security right causes the cessei agreement to be null and void or it is assumed that the transfer of accounts receivable has not yet occurred. In a sociological view, the non-registration of mortgage rights does not make the cessie cancel. The agreement has no material rights, because material rights have the principle of publicity. Publicity principle is a security right that must be registered. So that creditors change from preferred creditors to become concurrent creditors