《美国国家与早期西部》威廉·h·伯格曼著(书评)

D. Ingram
{"title":"《美国国家与早期西部》威廉·h·伯格曼著(书评)","authors":"D. Ingram","doi":"10.1353/mhr.2013.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The nature of white expansion into the trans-Appalachian West during the early republic has long been a fertile field of study. Recent scholars have emphasized race, violence, family and gender relations, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors as determinants of EuroAmerican expansion. In pointing to broader cultural or social patterns, some scholars have deemphasized the fledgling and flailing early federal government as an agent of active state building in the Northwest Territory, Kentucky, and Tennessee. William H. Bergmann seeks to reorient the story. Rather than stressing “laissezfaire, liberalism, state ineptitude, or complacency” as social and political determinants of expansion, Bergmann emphasizes the role of the federal government in “cultivating partnerships with state governments and local businesses, thereby fostering a commercial economy” (2). According to Bergmann, the fact that most American citizens at the time viewed the early federal government as “invisible” in promoting expansion does not accurately measure the central state’s actual influence in the new nation. Indeed, expansion is better viewed as the result of commercial partnerships that threaded deliberate federal policies into the goals of local merchants, state and territorial officials, and farmers. In most cases, Bergmann finds that federal bureaucracies played an integral role in economic and intercultural developments during western settlement between 1775 and 1815. Native and Euro-American economies lay at the center of Bergmann’s argument. He uses the concept of intercultural and internecine “property wars” in the 1770s and 1780s, much discussed by recent military historians, as a starting point. White settlers and Indians west of the Appalachians made land and livestock the targets of their expanding conflicts. Fort-based “garrison governments,” sent by the army into Kentucky and Ohio to enforce Indian treaty terms and police settler immigration, quickly came into conflict with anti-Indian local and state militias and eventually Native Americans. Because garrisons and armies needed food and Book Reviews","PeriodicalId":338407,"journal":{"name":"Ohio Valley History","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The American National State and the Early West by William H. Bergmann (review)\",\"authors\":\"D. Ingram\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/mhr.2013.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The nature of white expansion into the trans-Appalachian West during the early republic has long been a fertile field of study. Recent scholars have emphasized race, violence, family and gender relations, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors as determinants of EuroAmerican expansion. In pointing to broader cultural or social patterns, some scholars have deemphasized the fledgling and flailing early federal government as an agent of active state building in the Northwest Territory, Kentucky, and Tennessee. William H. Bergmann seeks to reorient the story. Rather than stressing “laissezfaire, liberalism, state ineptitude, or complacency” as social and political determinants of expansion, Bergmann emphasizes the role of the federal government in “cultivating partnerships with state governments and local businesses, thereby fostering a commercial economy” (2). According to Bergmann, the fact that most American citizens at the time viewed the early federal government as “invisible” in promoting expansion does not accurately measure the central state’s actual influence in the new nation. Indeed, expansion is better viewed as the result of commercial partnerships that threaded deliberate federal policies into the goals of local merchants, state and territorial officials, and farmers. In most cases, Bergmann finds that federal bureaucracies played an integral role in economic and intercultural developments during western settlement between 1775 and 1815. Native and Euro-American economies lay at the center of Bergmann’s argument. He uses the concept of intercultural and internecine “property wars” in the 1770s and 1780s, much discussed by recent military historians, as a starting point. White settlers and Indians west of the Appalachians made land and livestock the targets of their expanding conflicts. Fort-based “garrison governments,” sent by the army into Kentucky and Ohio to enforce Indian treaty terms and police settler immigration, quickly came into conflict with anti-Indian local and state militias and eventually Native Americans. Because garrisons and armies needed food and Book Reviews\",\"PeriodicalId\":338407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ohio Valley History\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ohio Valley History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/mhr.2013.0001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ohio Valley History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/mhr.2013.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共和初期白人向阿巴拉契亚西部地区扩张的本质一直是研究的沃土。最近的学者强调种族、暴力、家庭和性别关系、种族和社会经济因素是欧美扩张的决定因素。在指出更广泛的文化或社会模式时,一些学者已经不再强调在西北地区、肯塔基州和田纳西州,羽翼未丰、步履蹒跚的早期联邦政府作为积极的州建设的代理人。威廉·h·伯格曼试图重新定位这个故事。伯格曼没有强调“自由放任、自由主义、国家无能或自满”是扩张的社会和政治决定因素,而是强调联邦政府在“培养与州政府和地方企业的伙伴关系,从而培育商业经济”方面的作用(2)。当时大多数美国公民认为早期联邦政府在促进扩张方面是“隐形的”,这一事实并不能准确衡量中央政府在这个新国家中的实际影响。事实上,扩张最好被视为商业伙伴关系的结果,这种伙伴关系将深思熟虑的联邦政策融入当地商人、州和地区官员以及农民的目标中。在大多数情况下,伯格曼发现,在1775年至1815年西部定居期间,联邦官僚机构在经济和跨文化发展中发挥了不可或缺的作用。本土经济和欧美经济是伯格曼论点的核心。他以18世纪70年代和80年代的跨文化和自相残杀的“财产战争”概念为出发点,这是最近军事史学家讨论的很多问题。阿巴拉契亚山脉以西的白人定居者和印第安人把土地和牲畜作为他们不断扩大的冲突的目标。以堡垒为基础的“驻军政府”被军队派往肯塔基州和俄亥俄州,执行印第安人的条约条款,并监管移民,很快就与反印第安人的地方和州民兵发生冲突,最终与印第安人发生冲突。因为驻军和军队需要食物和书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The American National State and the Early West by William H. Bergmann (review)
The nature of white expansion into the trans-Appalachian West during the early republic has long been a fertile field of study. Recent scholars have emphasized race, violence, family and gender relations, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors as determinants of EuroAmerican expansion. In pointing to broader cultural or social patterns, some scholars have deemphasized the fledgling and flailing early federal government as an agent of active state building in the Northwest Territory, Kentucky, and Tennessee. William H. Bergmann seeks to reorient the story. Rather than stressing “laissezfaire, liberalism, state ineptitude, or complacency” as social and political determinants of expansion, Bergmann emphasizes the role of the federal government in “cultivating partnerships with state governments and local businesses, thereby fostering a commercial economy” (2). According to Bergmann, the fact that most American citizens at the time viewed the early federal government as “invisible” in promoting expansion does not accurately measure the central state’s actual influence in the new nation. Indeed, expansion is better viewed as the result of commercial partnerships that threaded deliberate federal policies into the goals of local merchants, state and territorial officials, and farmers. In most cases, Bergmann finds that federal bureaucracies played an integral role in economic and intercultural developments during western settlement between 1775 and 1815. Native and Euro-American economies lay at the center of Bergmann’s argument. He uses the concept of intercultural and internecine “property wars” in the 1770s and 1780s, much discussed by recent military historians, as a starting point. White settlers and Indians west of the Appalachians made land and livestock the targets of their expanding conflicts. Fort-based “garrison governments,” sent by the army into Kentucky and Ohio to enforce Indian treaty terms and police settler immigration, quickly came into conflict with anti-Indian local and state militias and eventually Native Americans. Because garrisons and armies needed food and Book Reviews
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信