没有关键角色,社会传染病会蔓延吗?

Gizem Korkmaz, C. Kuhlman, F. Vega-Redondo
{"title":"没有关键角色,社会传染病会蔓延吗?","authors":"Gizem Korkmaz, C. Kuhlman, F. Vega-Redondo","doi":"10.1109/BESC.2016.7804473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contagion models have been used to study the spread of social behavior among agents of a population, such as information diffusion, social influence, and participation to collective action (e.g., protests). Key players, which are typically high-degree, -k-core or -centrality agents in a networked population, are considered important for spreading social contagions. In this paper, we ask whether contagions can propagate through a population that is void of key players. We use Erdos-Renyi random graphs as a representation of unstructured populations that lack key players, and investigate whether complex contagions - those requiring reinforcement - can spread on them. We demonstrate that two game-theoretic contagion models that utilize common knowledge for collective action can readily spread such contagions, which is a significant difference from classic complex contagion models. We compare contagion dynamics results on unstructured networks to those on more typically-studied, structured social networks to understand the role of network structure. We test a total of 14 networks. The two common knowledge models are also contrasted to understand the effects of different modeling assumptions on dynamics. We show that under a wide range of conditions, these two models produce markedly different results.","PeriodicalId":225942,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Behavioral, Economic and Socio-cultural Computing (BESC)","volume":"372 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can social contagion spread without key players?\",\"authors\":\"Gizem Korkmaz, C. Kuhlman, F. Vega-Redondo\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BESC.2016.7804473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contagion models have been used to study the spread of social behavior among agents of a population, such as information diffusion, social influence, and participation to collective action (e.g., protests). Key players, which are typically high-degree, -k-core or -centrality agents in a networked population, are considered important for spreading social contagions. In this paper, we ask whether contagions can propagate through a population that is void of key players. We use Erdos-Renyi random graphs as a representation of unstructured populations that lack key players, and investigate whether complex contagions - those requiring reinforcement - can spread on them. We demonstrate that two game-theoretic contagion models that utilize common knowledge for collective action can readily spread such contagions, which is a significant difference from classic complex contagion models. We compare contagion dynamics results on unstructured networks to those on more typically-studied, structured social networks to understand the role of network structure. We test a total of 14 networks. The two common knowledge models are also contrasted to understand the effects of different modeling assumptions on dynamics. We show that under a wide range of conditions, these two models produce markedly different results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":225942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 International Conference on Behavioral, Economic and Socio-cultural Computing (BESC)\",\"volume\":\"372 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 International Conference on Behavioral, Economic and Socio-cultural Computing (BESC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BESC.2016.7804473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Behavioral, Economic and Socio-cultural Computing (BESC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BESC.2016.7804473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

传染模型已被用于研究社会行为在群体主体之间的传播,如信息扩散、社会影响和参与集体行动(如抗议)。关键参与者是网络人群中典型的高度、-k-core或-centrality代理人,被认为对传播社会传染很重要。在这篇论文中,我们提出了一个问题,即传染病是否可以在没有关键参与者的人群中传播。我们使用Erdos-Renyi随机图作为缺乏关键参与者的非结构化人群的代表,并调查复杂的传染(那些需要加强的)是否可以在他们身上传播。我们证明了两种利用共同知识进行集体行动的博弈论传染模型可以很容易地传播这种传染,这与经典的复杂传染模型有显著的区别。我们将非结构化网络的传染动力学结果与那些更典型的研究、结构化社会网络的传染动力学结果进行比较,以了解网络结构的作用。我们总共测试了14个网络。对比了两种常见的知识模型,以了解不同的建模假设对动力学的影响。我们表明,在广泛的条件下,这两个模型产生明显不同的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can social contagion spread without key players?
Contagion models have been used to study the spread of social behavior among agents of a population, such as information diffusion, social influence, and participation to collective action (e.g., protests). Key players, which are typically high-degree, -k-core or -centrality agents in a networked population, are considered important for spreading social contagions. In this paper, we ask whether contagions can propagate through a population that is void of key players. We use Erdos-Renyi random graphs as a representation of unstructured populations that lack key players, and investigate whether complex contagions - those requiring reinforcement - can spread on them. We demonstrate that two game-theoretic contagion models that utilize common knowledge for collective action can readily spread such contagions, which is a significant difference from classic complex contagion models. We compare contagion dynamics results on unstructured networks to those on more typically-studied, structured social networks to understand the role of network structure. We test a total of 14 networks. The two common knowledge models are also contrasted to understand the effects of different modeling assumptions on dynamics. We show that under a wide range of conditions, these two models produce markedly different results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信