统计教育中工具效度证据的探索:初步发现

Douglas Whitaker, C. Bolch, Leigh Harrell-Williams, Stephanie A. Casey, Corinne Huggins-Manley, Christopher Engledowl, H. Tjoe
{"title":"统计教育中工具效度证据的探索:初步发现","authors":"Douglas Whitaker, C. Bolch, Leigh Harrell-Williams, Stephanie A. Casey, Corinne Huggins-Manley, Christopher Engledowl, H. Tjoe","doi":"10.52041/iase.obaue","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Interpreting results from instruments requires appropriate validity evidence. However, evolution in the fields of educational measurement and statistics education means that the validity evidence supporting instruments is often narrowly focused. For the Validity Evidence for Measurement in Mathematics Education project, we are systematically documenting validity evidence for instruments used to measure constructs in statistics education (such as knowledge and attitudes) for students and instructors. The researchers identified instruments measuring statistics-specific constructs, where and how these instruments were used, and validity evidence supporting their use. A structured literature review approach was used to identify instruments developed since 2000 and studies that used them or contained relevant validity evidence. Validity evidence for each instrument was documented using a standardized system. Preliminary information about the instruments identified, the frequency of their published use, and the amount of published work containing validity evidence will be presented.","PeriodicalId":189852,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the IASE 2021 Satellite Conference","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The search for validity evidence for instruments in statistics education: preliminary findings\",\"authors\":\"Douglas Whitaker, C. Bolch, Leigh Harrell-Williams, Stephanie A. Casey, Corinne Huggins-Manley, Christopher Engledowl, H. Tjoe\",\"doi\":\"10.52041/iase.obaue\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Interpreting results from instruments requires appropriate validity evidence. However, evolution in the fields of educational measurement and statistics education means that the validity evidence supporting instruments is often narrowly focused. For the Validity Evidence for Measurement in Mathematics Education project, we are systematically documenting validity evidence for instruments used to measure constructs in statistics education (such as knowledge and attitudes) for students and instructors. The researchers identified instruments measuring statistics-specific constructs, where and how these instruments were used, and validity evidence supporting their use. A structured literature review approach was used to identify instruments developed since 2000 and studies that used them or contained relevant validity evidence. Validity evidence for each instrument was documented using a standardized system. Preliminary information about the instruments identified, the frequency of their published use, and the amount of published work containing validity evidence will be presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":189852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the IASE 2021 Satellite Conference\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the IASE 2021 Satellite Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52041/iase.obaue\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the IASE 2021 Satellite Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52041/iase.obaue","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解释仪器的结果需要适当的有效性证据。然而,教育测量和统计教育领域的发展意味着支持工具的有效性证据往往是狭隘的。对于“数学教育测量的效度证据”项目,我们正在系统地记录用于测量学生和教师在统计教育中建构(如知识和态度)的工具的效度证据。研究人员确定了测量统计特定结构的工具,这些工具的使用地点和方式,以及支持其使用的有效性证据。采用结构化的文献回顾方法来确定自2000年以来开发的工具以及使用它们或包含相关效度证据的研究。使用标准化系统记录每种仪器的有效性证据。将介绍所鉴定的仪器的初步信息、其已发表使用的频率以及包含有效性证据的已发表作品的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The search for validity evidence for instruments in statistics education: preliminary findings
Interpreting results from instruments requires appropriate validity evidence. However, evolution in the fields of educational measurement and statistics education means that the validity evidence supporting instruments is often narrowly focused. For the Validity Evidence for Measurement in Mathematics Education project, we are systematically documenting validity evidence for instruments used to measure constructs in statistics education (such as knowledge and attitudes) for students and instructors. The researchers identified instruments measuring statistics-specific constructs, where and how these instruments were used, and validity evidence supporting their use. A structured literature review approach was used to identify instruments developed since 2000 and studies that used them or contained relevant validity evidence. Validity evidence for each instrument was documented using a standardized system. Preliminary information about the instruments identified, the frequency of their published use, and the amount of published work containing validity evidence will be presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信