三佛法绩效考核制度的应用

Kiswanto Kiswanto, B. Benny, Yurindra Yuri, Marini Mar, Sarwindah . Sarwindah, Supardi U. S. Supardi
{"title":"三佛法绩效考核制度的应用","authors":"Kiswanto Kiswanto, B. Benny, Yurindra Yuri, Marini Mar, Sarwindah . Sarwindah, Supardi U. S. Supardi","doi":"10.21456/vol12iss1pp57-65","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is motivated by several problems related to the not-yet optimal implementation of the performance assessment of tri dharma lecturers and work behavior on the ISB Atma Luhur campus. The importance of this research is because the tri dharma lecturer performance appraisal system and work behavior are useful for study program accreditation and university accreditation. The purpose of this study is to make lecturers responsible for the tri dharma and work behavior. The method used in this study is the ANFIS logic method. The results of this study are in the form of a lecturer's report card or a lecturer's performance assessment for one semester issued by SPMI. The variables used are education and teaching 40%, research 20%, dedication 10%, and work behavior 30%. The main result is the report card for each lecturer. The main finding from the lecturers' report cards, a decision can be made for SPMI to reprimand lecturers whose lecturers report cards to fall into the category of \"BAD\" lecturer performance. The average teaching value obtained is 3,624 plus the research value is 2,920 plus the service value is 2,800 plus work behavior, the value is 2,908. Lecturer performance value = 0.4 teaching plus 0.2 research plus 0.1 community service plus 0.3 work behavior. Equals 1.450 plus 0.584 plus 0.280 plus 0.872 equals 3.186. So the performance value of this lecturer is included in the category of \"GOOD\" lecturer performance.","PeriodicalId":123899,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penerapan Logika ANFIS Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Pada Tri Dharma dan Perilaku Kerja\",\"authors\":\"Kiswanto Kiswanto, B. Benny, Yurindra Yuri, Marini Mar, Sarwindah . Sarwindah, Supardi U. S. Supardi\",\"doi\":\"10.21456/vol12iss1pp57-65\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research is motivated by several problems related to the not-yet optimal implementation of the performance assessment of tri dharma lecturers and work behavior on the ISB Atma Luhur campus. The importance of this research is because the tri dharma lecturer performance appraisal system and work behavior are useful for study program accreditation and university accreditation. The purpose of this study is to make lecturers responsible for the tri dharma and work behavior. The method used in this study is the ANFIS logic method. The results of this study are in the form of a lecturer's report card or a lecturer's performance assessment for one semester issued by SPMI. The variables used are education and teaching 40%, research 20%, dedication 10%, and work behavior 30%. The main result is the report card for each lecturer. The main finding from the lecturers' report cards, a decision can be made for SPMI to reprimand lecturers whose lecturers report cards to fall into the category of \\\"BAD\\\" lecturer performance. The average teaching value obtained is 3,624 plus the research value is 2,920 plus the service value is 2,800 plus work behavior, the value is 2,908. Lecturer performance value = 0.4 teaching plus 0.2 research plus 0.1 community service plus 0.3 work behavior. Equals 1.450 plus 0.584 plus 0.280 plus 0.872 equals 3.186. So the performance value of this lecturer is included in the category of \\\"GOOD\\\" lecturer performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis\",\"volume\":\"195 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21456/vol12iss1pp57-65\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21456/vol12iss1pp57-65","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的动机是与ISB Atma Luhur校区三法讲师绩效评估和工作行为尚未最佳实施有关的几个问题。本研究的重要性在于,三法讲师的绩效评估体系和工作行为对学习计划认证和大学认证都是有用的。本研究的目的是让讲师对三法和工作行为负责。本研究采用的方法是ANFIS逻辑方法。本次研究的结果以讲师成绩单或讲师一个学期的绩效评估的形式由SPMI颁发。使用的变量是教育和教学40%,研究20%,奉献10%,工作行为30%。主要的结果是每个讲师的成绩单。从讲师的成绩单中主要发现,如果讲师的成绩单属于“BAD”类别,SPMI可以决定对讲师进行训斥。得到的平均教学价值为3624加上研究价值为2920加上服务价值为2800加上工作行为,其值为2908。讲师绩效值= 0.4教学+ 0.2研究+ 0.1社区服务+ 0.3工作行为。等于1.450 + 0.584 + 0.280 + 0.872 = 3.186。因此,该讲师的绩效价值被纳入“优秀”讲师绩效的范畴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Penerapan Logika ANFIS Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Pada Tri Dharma dan Perilaku Kerja
This research is motivated by several problems related to the not-yet optimal implementation of the performance assessment of tri dharma lecturers and work behavior on the ISB Atma Luhur campus. The importance of this research is because the tri dharma lecturer performance appraisal system and work behavior are useful for study program accreditation and university accreditation. The purpose of this study is to make lecturers responsible for the tri dharma and work behavior. The method used in this study is the ANFIS logic method. The results of this study are in the form of a lecturer's report card or a lecturer's performance assessment for one semester issued by SPMI. The variables used are education and teaching 40%, research 20%, dedication 10%, and work behavior 30%. The main result is the report card for each lecturer. The main finding from the lecturers' report cards, a decision can be made for SPMI to reprimand lecturers whose lecturers report cards to fall into the category of "BAD" lecturer performance. The average teaching value obtained is 3,624 plus the research value is 2,920 plus the service value is 2,800 plus work behavior, the value is 2,908. Lecturer performance value = 0.4 teaching plus 0.2 research plus 0.1 community service plus 0.3 work behavior. Equals 1.450 plus 0.584 plus 0.280 plus 0.872 equals 3.186. So the performance value of this lecturer is included in the category of "GOOD" lecturer performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信