生理盐水(0.9%)与聚维酮碘(10%)冲洗对剖宫产术后创面愈合过程的比较研究

Dedi Kurnia, R. Widiasih, Urip Rahayu
{"title":"生理盐水(0.9%)与聚维酮碘(10%)冲洗对剖宫产术后创面愈合过程的比较研究","authors":"Dedi Kurnia, R. Widiasih, Urip Rahayu","doi":"10.36780/jmcrh.v5i2.254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is a complication after surgery, and one of the causes is the use of intra-operative irrigation fluids. The most common irrigation fluid was 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine in several hospitals in Indonesia. However, the difference in composition has not been observed for its effect on wound healing. This study aimed to determine the difference in using 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine for irrigation in the wound healing process for post-cesarean patients. The research design used is a descriptive comparative study with ex post facto approaches. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers changed the data collection method from direct observations to analyzing secondary data post-cesarean surgery data in 2019. The study was conducted in a referral hospital in West Java Province, Indonesia. The sampling used non-probability sampling with a purposive sampling technique. The sample was 440 patient medical records. These records consisted of 0.9% Normal Saline irrigation fluid, 140 respondents, and 10% Povidone-Iodine irrigation fluid, 300 respondents. The chi-square analysis showed significant differences in the two types of intra-operative wound irrigation (0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine) with a wound healing process (P-value = 0.021). The distribution frequency showed that the infection of 0.9% Normal Saline fluid was 5% of the 133 respondents, and 10% Povidone-Iodine was 12% out of 300 respondents. The study results showed that 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-iodine could be used for intra-operative wound irrigation with different characteristics and compositions that impact the postoperative wound healing process. There is a need for further research to do a direct observation to test the effectiveness of two types of irrigation fluids from intra-operative to postoperative and assess other influencing factors.  ","PeriodicalId":329422,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Maternity Care and Reproductive Health","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PROCESS OF WOUND HEALING IN POST SECTIO CAESAREA PATIENTS USING NORMAL SALINE (0.9%) AND POVIDONE-IODINE (10%) IRRIGATIONS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY\",\"authors\":\"Dedi Kurnia, R. Widiasih, Urip Rahayu\",\"doi\":\"10.36780/jmcrh.v5i2.254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is a complication after surgery, and one of the causes is the use of intra-operative irrigation fluids. The most common irrigation fluid was 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine in several hospitals in Indonesia. However, the difference in composition has not been observed for its effect on wound healing. This study aimed to determine the difference in using 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine for irrigation in the wound healing process for post-cesarean patients. The research design used is a descriptive comparative study with ex post facto approaches. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers changed the data collection method from direct observations to analyzing secondary data post-cesarean surgery data in 2019. The study was conducted in a referral hospital in West Java Province, Indonesia. The sampling used non-probability sampling with a purposive sampling technique. The sample was 440 patient medical records. These records consisted of 0.9% Normal Saline irrigation fluid, 140 respondents, and 10% Povidone-Iodine irrigation fluid, 300 respondents. The chi-square analysis showed significant differences in the two types of intra-operative wound irrigation (0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine) with a wound healing process (P-value = 0.021). The distribution frequency showed that the infection of 0.9% Normal Saline fluid was 5% of the 133 respondents, and 10% Povidone-Iodine was 12% out of 300 respondents. The study results showed that 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-iodine could be used for intra-operative wound irrigation with different characteristics and compositions that impact the postoperative wound healing process. There is a need for further research to do a direct observation to test the effectiveness of two types of irrigation fluids from intra-operative to postoperative and assess other influencing factors.  \",\"PeriodicalId\":329422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Maternity Care and Reproductive Health\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Maternity Care and Reproductive Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36780/jmcrh.v5i2.254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Maternity Care and Reproductive Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36780/jmcrh.v5i2.254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

手术部位感染(SSI)是手术后的并发症,其原因之一是术中冲洗液的使用。在印度尼西亚的几家医院,最常见的冲洗液是0.9%生理盐水和10%聚维酮碘。然而,尚未观察到成分的差异对伤口愈合的影响。本研究旨在探讨剖宫产术后伤口愈合过程中,0.9%生理盐水与10%聚维酮碘冲洗的差异。使用的研究设计是一个描述性的比较研究与事后的方法。由于COVID-19大流行,研究人员将数据收集方法从直接观察改为分析2019年剖宫产术后数据的二次数据。该研究在印度尼西亚西爪哇省的一家转诊医院进行。抽样采用非概率抽样和目的性抽样技术。样本是440个病人的医疗记录。这些记录包括0.9%生理盐水冲洗液,140名应答者,10%聚维酮碘冲洗液,300名应答者。卡方分析显示两种术中伤口冲洗(0.9%生理盐水和10%聚维酮碘)与伤口愈合过程差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.021)。分布频次显示,0.9%生理盐水感染占133人的5%,10%聚维酮碘感染占300人的12%。研究结果显示,0.9%生理盐水和10%聚维酮碘可用于术中伤口冲洗,其不同的特性和成分会影响术后伤口愈合过程。对两种灌洗液从术中到术后的有效性进行直接观察,并评估其他影响因素,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE PROCESS OF WOUND HEALING IN POST SECTIO CAESAREA PATIENTS USING NORMAL SALINE (0.9%) AND POVIDONE-IODINE (10%) IRRIGATIONS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is a complication after surgery, and one of the causes is the use of intra-operative irrigation fluids. The most common irrigation fluid was 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine in several hospitals in Indonesia. However, the difference in composition has not been observed for its effect on wound healing. This study aimed to determine the difference in using 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine for irrigation in the wound healing process for post-cesarean patients. The research design used is a descriptive comparative study with ex post facto approaches. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers changed the data collection method from direct observations to analyzing secondary data post-cesarean surgery data in 2019. The study was conducted in a referral hospital in West Java Province, Indonesia. The sampling used non-probability sampling with a purposive sampling technique. The sample was 440 patient medical records. These records consisted of 0.9% Normal Saline irrigation fluid, 140 respondents, and 10% Povidone-Iodine irrigation fluid, 300 respondents. The chi-square analysis showed significant differences in the two types of intra-operative wound irrigation (0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-Iodine) with a wound healing process (P-value = 0.021). The distribution frequency showed that the infection of 0.9% Normal Saline fluid was 5% of the 133 respondents, and 10% Povidone-Iodine was 12% out of 300 respondents. The study results showed that 0.9% Normal Saline and 10% Povidone-iodine could be used for intra-operative wound irrigation with different characteristics and compositions that impact the postoperative wound healing process. There is a need for further research to do a direct observation to test the effectiveness of two types of irrigation fluids from intra-operative to postoperative and assess other influencing factors.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信