知识整合的常识推理

M. Freiling, Daniel Sagalowicz
{"title":"知识整合的常识推理","authors":"M. Freiling, Daniel Sagalowicz","doi":"10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the field of Artificial Intelligence has made significant advances in building deep models of complex tasks. One area, however, that seems to have lagged behind is the domain of \"common sense reasoning.\" Much common sense reasoning research has defined the term in a way that requires deep models of everyday phenomena, making progress difficult. Common sense reasoning does not in itself need to be a deep process. It can be limited to a single task - integrating the knowledge provided by other models and information sources, focusing only on the dominant conditions identified by each model. To remedy these shortcomings, we propose an approach based on an architecture that we refer to as CS+CM, for \"Common Sense Plus Constituent Models\". In a CS+CM architecture, the common sense (CS) layer plays an integration role that only requires limited inferential capabilities. In addition, we propose concrete limits to representational and inferential capabilities, and identify the structural requirements for deeper models to support integration at the common sense layer. We illustrate this approach with examples in diverse areas of capital investment, team selection, and behavioral finance.","PeriodicalId":438177,"journal":{"name":"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Common Sense Reasoning for Knowledge Integration\",\"authors\":\"M. Freiling, Daniel Sagalowicz\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, the field of Artificial Intelligence has made significant advances in building deep models of complex tasks. One area, however, that seems to have lagged behind is the domain of \\\"common sense reasoning.\\\" Much common sense reasoning research has defined the term in a way that requires deep models of everyday phenomena, making progress difficult. Common sense reasoning does not in itself need to be a deep process. It can be limited to a single task - integrating the knowledge provided by other models and information sources, focusing only on the dominant conditions identified by each model. To remedy these shortcomings, we propose an approach based on an architecture that we refer to as CS+CM, for \\\"Common Sense Plus Constituent Models\\\". In a CS+CM architecture, the common sense (CS) layer plays an integration role that only requires limited inferential capabilities. In addition, we propose concrete limits to representational and inferential capabilities, and identify the structural requirements for deeper models to support integration at the common sense layer. We illustrate this approach with examples in diverse areas of capital investment, team selection, and behavioral finance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/PICMET.2017.8125458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,人工智能领域在构建复杂任务的深度模型方面取得了重大进展。然而,有一个领域似乎落后了,那就是“常识推理”领域。许多常识推理研究都以一种需要日常现象的深层模型的方式来定义这个术语,这使得进展变得困难。常识推理本身并不需要是一个深刻的过程。它可以局限于一个单一的任务——整合其他模型和信息源提供的知识,只关注每个模型确定的主导条件。为了弥补这些缺点,我们提出了一种基于架构的方法,我们称之为CS+CM,即“常识加组成模型”。在CS+CM体系结构中,常识层(common sense, CS)扮演集成角色,只需要有限的推理能力。此外,我们提出了表征和推理能力的具体限制,并确定了更深层次模型的结构需求,以支持常识层的集成。我们用资本投资、团队选择和行为金融等不同领域的例子来说明这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Common Sense Reasoning for Knowledge Integration
Recently, the field of Artificial Intelligence has made significant advances in building deep models of complex tasks. One area, however, that seems to have lagged behind is the domain of "common sense reasoning." Much common sense reasoning research has defined the term in a way that requires deep models of everyday phenomena, making progress difficult. Common sense reasoning does not in itself need to be a deep process. It can be limited to a single task - integrating the knowledge provided by other models and information sources, focusing only on the dominant conditions identified by each model. To remedy these shortcomings, we propose an approach based on an architecture that we refer to as CS+CM, for "Common Sense Plus Constituent Models". In a CS+CM architecture, the common sense (CS) layer plays an integration role that only requires limited inferential capabilities. In addition, we propose concrete limits to representational and inferential capabilities, and identify the structural requirements for deeper models to support integration at the common sense layer. We illustrate this approach with examples in diverse areas of capital investment, team selection, and behavioral finance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信