没有金融流通的产业?

J. Toporowski
{"title":"没有金融流通的产业?","authors":"J. Toporowski","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198816232.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The theory of the monetary circuit, as represented in the work of Augusto Graziani, appears as a ‘natural’ complement to the monetary theory of Kalecki because both share a focus on the circulation of money rather than monetary aggregates. However, the ‘circuitist’ theory differs in assuming that capitalists have no money and therefore need ‘initial finance’. Graziani has credit used as means of payment, with the credit of workers as claims on indebted capitalists. ‘Neo-Kaleckian’ financialization theory has capitalists’ credit as claims on indebted workers. Both exaggerate the importance of inter-class debt, at the expense of the intra-class debt whose circulation among capitalists is the foundation of Kalecki’s monetary macroeconomics.","PeriodicalId":313534,"journal":{"name":"Interest and Capital","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industrial without Financial Circulation?\",\"authors\":\"J. Toporowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198816232.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The theory of the monetary circuit, as represented in the work of Augusto Graziani, appears as a ‘natural’ complement to the monetary theory of Kalecki because both share a focus on the circulation of money rather than monetary aggregates. However, the ‘circuitist’ theory differs in assuming that capitalists have no money and therefore need ‘initial finance’. Graziani has credit used as means of payment, with the credit of workers as claims on indebted capitalists. ‘Neo-Kaleckian’ financialization theory has capitalists’ credit as claims on indebted workers. Both exaggerate the importance of inter-class debt, at the expense of the intra-class debt whose circulation among capitalists is the foundation of Kalecki’s monetary macroeconomics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":313534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interest and Capital\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interest and Capital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816232.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interest and Capital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816232.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奥古斯托·格拉齐亚尼(Augusto Graziani)的作品所代表的货币循环理论,似乎是对卡莱茨基货币理论的“自然”补充,因为两者都关注货币的流通,而不是货币总量。然而,“电路主义者”理论的不同之处在于,它假设资本家没有钱,因此需要“初始融资”。格拉齐亚尼把信用作为支付手段,把工人的信用作为负债的资本家的债权。“新卡列基”金融化理论将资本家的信用视为对负债工人的债权。两者都夸大了阶级间债务的重要性,以牺牲阶级内债务为代价,而阶级内债务在资本家之间的流通是卡莱茨基货币宏观经济学的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Industrial without Financial Circulation?
The theory of the monetary circuit, as represented in the work of Augusto Graziani, appears as a ‘natural’ complement to the monetary theory of Kalecki because both share a focus on the circulation of money rather than monetary aggregates. However, the ‘circuitist’ theory differs in assuming that capitalists have no money and therefore need ‘initial finance’. Graziani has credit used as means of payment, with the credit of workers as claims on indebted capitalists. ‘Neo-Kaleckian’ financialization theory has capitalists’ credit as claims on indebted workers. Both exaggerate the importance of inter-class debt, at the expense of the intra-class debt whose circulation among capitalists is the foundation of Kalecki’s monetary macroeconomics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信