covid - 19大流行时期学校社会工作者在促进公平方面的专业实践

Sidalina Almeida
{"title":"covid - 19大流行时期学校社会工作者在促进公平方面的专业实践","authors":"Sidalina Almeida","doi":"10.36315/2022v2end098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Children and young people from different social and cultural backgrounds, nationalities, ethnicities access school, but they have not had the same opportunities for school success and to see their right to education and other human rights guaranteed. Intervening with this diversity in a positive way means making difference, not synonymous with stigmatization and school and social exclusion, but rather with school and social inclusion, through the promotion of equity and social justice. The covid 19 pandemic, by electing distance learning, expanded and intensified the risks of dropout and failure of students with a more fragile relationship with the school, accentuating social inequalities and other inequalities and not allowing the multiplicity of their needs to be satisfied, in the sense of its integral development. The increased risk of school dropout and failure is more accentuated in some segments of the population, namely, those with greater social vulnerabilities. The government wanted to respond to the problems of absenteeism and school dropout, child poverty, intra-family violence and mental illness, which were aggravated by the covid-19 pandemic, giving guidance to managers, teachers and technicians to reinvent the role of the school in times of physical distance, quarantine and isolation. In this reinvention, the intervention strategies of the multidisciplinary teams of the schools were highlighted in the identification, signaling and monitoring of risk/danger situations for children and young people and in the articulation with the competent authorities and the community institutions, in promoting the right to education and social protection of children and young people. In these teams, social workers, with a diversified and multi-referenced academic scientific and technical background, have the necessary conditions to intervene in the realization of the right to education because they are able to bring together and promote the collaboration and communication that is essential between knowledge and educational actors for the elaboration of a diagnosis and respective intervention plan, which should focus on the three main domains of the ecological model of assessment in risk/danger situations: the child's developmental needs, the parental skills of the families and the family and ecological factors. Focusing on a qualitative approach, through interviews with social workers who are part of multidisciplinary teams in school clusters, we sought to know how these professionals, in times of pandemic, perceive their functions and tasks, their professional practices and its potential in making the right to education effective and in combating school and social inequalities.\"","PeriodicalId":404891,"journal":{"name":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES OF SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS IN PROMOTING EQUITY IN TIMES OF COVID 19 PANDEMIC\",\"authors\":\"Sidalina Almeida\",\"doi\":\"10.36315/2022v2end098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Children and young people from different social and cultural backgrounds, nationalities, ethnicities access school, but they have not had the same opportunities for school success and to see their right to education and other human rights guaranteed. Intervening with this diversity in a positive way means making difference, not synonymous with stigmatization and school and social exclusion, but rather with school and social inclusion, through the promotion of equity and social justice. The covid 19 pandemic, by electing distance learning, expanded and intensified the risks of dropout and failure of students with a more fragile relationship with the school, accentuating social inequalities and other inequalities and not allowing the multiplicity of their needs to be satisfied, in the sense of its integral development. The increased risk of school dropout and failure is more accentuated in some segments of the population, namely, those with greater social vulnerabilities. The government wanted to respond to the problems of absenteeism and school dropout, child poverty, intra-family violence and mental illness, which were aggravated by the covid-19 pandemic, giving guidance to managers, teachers and technicians to reinvent the role of the school in times of physical distance, quarantine and isolation. In this reinvention, the intervention strategies of the multidisciplinary teams of the schools were highlighted in the identification, signaling and monitoring of risk/danger situations for children and young people and in the articulation with the competent authorities and the community institutions, in promoting the right to education and social protection of children and young people. In these teams, social workers, with a diversified and multi-referenced academic scientific and technical background, have the necessary conditions to intervene in the realization of the right to education because they are able to bring together and promote the collaboration and communication that is essential between knowledge and educational actors for the elaboration of a diagnosis and respective intervention plan, which should focus on the three main domains of the ecological model of assessment in risk/danger situations: the child's developmental needs, the parental skills of the families and the family and ecological factors. Focusing on a qualitative approach, through interviews with social workers who are part of multidisciplinary teams in school clusters, we sought to know how these professionals, in times of pandemic, perceive their functions and tasks, their professional practices and its potential in making the right to education effective and in combating school and social inequalities.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":404891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v2end098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and New Developments 2022 – Volume 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2022v2end098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“来自不同社会和文化背景、国籍、种族的儿童和年轻人可以上学,但他们没有同样的机会在学校取得成功,也没有同样的机会看到他们的受教育权和其他人权得到保障。以积极的方式干预这种多样性意味着有所作为,不是污名化、学校和社会排斥的同义词,而是通过促进公平和社会正义,实现学校和社会包容。2019冠状病毒病大流行选择了远程学习,扩大和加剧了与学校关系更为脆弱的学生的辍学和失败风险,加剧了社会不平等和其他不平等,无法满足他们在整体发展意义上的多重需求。在人口的某些部分,即社会脆弱性较大的人群中,辍学和失败的风险增加更为突出。政府希望应对因covid-19大流行而加剧的旷工和辍学、儿童贫困、家庭内部暴力和精神疾病等问题,指导管理人员、教师和技术人员在物理距离、隔离和隔离时期重塑学校的作用。在这次改造中,学校多学科小组的干预战略在查明、发出信号和监测儿童和青年的风险/危险情况以及与主管当局和社区机构的联系、促进儿童和青年的受教育权和社会保护方面得到了突出。在这些团队中,具有多样化和多参考学术科学和技术背景的社会工作者具有干预实现受教育权的必要条件,因为他们能够汇集和促进知识和教育行动者之间的合作和沟通,这对于制定诊断和各自的干预计划至关重要。它应该集中在风险/危险情况下评估的生态模型的三个主要领域:儿童的发展需求,家庭的父母技能以及家庭和生态因素。我们侧重于定性方法,通过与学校集群中多学科团队的社会工作者进行访谈,试图了解这些专业人员在大流行病时期如何看待其职能和任务、其专业做法及其在有效实现受教育权和消除学校和社会不平等方面的潜力。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES OF SCHOOL SOCIAL WORKERS IN PROMOTING EQUITY IN TIMES OF COVID 19 PANDEMIC
"Children and young people from different social and cultural backgrounds, nationalities, ethnicities access school, but they have not had the same opportunities for school success and to see their right to education and other human rights guaranteed. Intervening with this diversity in a positive way means making difference, not synonymous with stigmatization and school and social exclusion, but rather with school and social inclusion, through the promotion of equity and social justice. The covid 19 pandemic, by electing distance learning, expanded and intensified the risks of dropout and failure of students with a more fragile relationship with the school, accentuating social inequalities and other inequalities and not allowing the multiplicity of their needs to be satisfied, in the sense of its integral development. The increased risk of school dropout and failure is more accentuated in some segments of the population, namely, those with greater social vulnerabilities. The government wanted to respond to the problems of absenteeism and school dropout, child poverty, intra-family violence and mental illness, which were aggravated by the covid-19 pandemic, giving guidance to managers, teachers and technicians to reinvent the role of the school in times of physical distance, quarantine and isolation. In this reinvention, the intervention strategies of the multidisciplinary teams of the schools were highlighted in the identification, signaling and monitoring of risk/danger situations for children and young people and in the articulation with the competent authorities and the community institutions, in promoting the right to education and social protection of children and young people. In these teams, social workers, with a diversified and multi-referenced academic scientific and technical background, have the necessary conditions to intervene in the realization of the right to education because they are able to bring together and promote the collaboration and communication that is essential between knowledge and educational actors for the elaboration of a diagnosis and respective intervention plan, which should focus on the three main domains of the ecological model of assessment in risk/danger situations: the child's developmental needs, the parental skills of the families and the family and ecological factors. Focusing on a qualitative approach, through interviews with social workers who are part of multidisciplinary teams in school clusters, we sought to know how these professionals, in times of pandemic, perceive their functions and tasks, their professional practices and its potential in making the right to education effective and in combating school and social inequalities."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信