{"title":"深水跑步和跑步机跑步中感知力量等级的比较:运动强度处方的考虑","authors":"Martyn J. Matthews, N. Airey","doi":"10.1080/10578310127608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deep water running (DWR) is a form a aquatic exercise that simulates the action of land based running (LBR), but appears to cause less musculo-skeletal stress. Consequently, it has become a popular training modality for athletes recovering from injury. The psychophysical effects of DWR and LBR respectively were investigated at three exercise intensities. Maximum heart rate (HR max ) was established using a Cooper 1.5 mile run test and the Karvonen Heart Rate Reserve (HRR) method was used to calculate exercise intensity at 60%, 70%, and 80% HRR, respectively. Six males and four females with a mean age (‐SD) of 28.1 ‐ 4.9 years and unfamiliar with DWR undertook a 30-minute test in both DWR and LBR conditions. Each test consisted of 3 x 10 minute periods at 60%, 70%, and 80% HRR respectively. Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) was recorded during the last minute of each period. A difference in RPE was found between LBR and DWR at 60% (11.4 Vs 12.8, p < 0.001), 70% (12.9 Vs 15.2, p < 0.001), and 80% HRR (14.5 Vs 17.7, p < 0.001). A significant difference in RPE was attributed to localized fatigue associated with the unfamiliarity of the task, reflected by increased cardiovascular stress at any given heart rate. Athletes and trainers should exhibit caution when prescribing a specific DWR exercise intensity based on HR max date obtained from a land based test. A downward adjustment of 12n17 beats per minute is considered prudent to ensure that exercise intensity is appropriate to the goal of the training program and to the traineeis current ability.","PeriodicalId":403174,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Deep Water Running and Treadmill Running: Considerations in the Prescription of Exercise Intensity\",\"authors\":\"Martyn J. Matthews, N. Airey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10578310127608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deep water running (DWR) is a form a aquatic exercise that simulates the action of land based running (LBR), but appears to cause less musculo-skeletal stress. Consequently, it has become a popular training modality for athletes recovering from injury. The psychophysical effects of DWR and LBR respectively were investigated at three exercise intensities. Maximum heart rate (HR max ) was established using a Cooper 1.5 mile run test and the Karvonen Heart Rate Reserve (HRR) method was used to calculate exercise intensity at 60%, 70%, and 80% HRR, respectively. Six males and four females with a mean age (‐SD) of 28.1 ‐ 4.9 years and unfamiliar with DWR undertook a 30-minute test in both DWR and LBR conditions. Each test consisted of 3 x 10 minute periods at 60%, 70%, and 80% HRR respectively. Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) was recorded during the last minute of each period. A difference in RPE was found between LBR and DWR at 60% (11.4 Vs 12.8, p < 0.001), 70% (12.9 Vs 15.2, p < 0.001), and 80% HRR (14.5 Vs 17.7, p < 0.001). A significant difference in RPE was attributed to localized fatigue associated with the unfamiliarity of the task, reflected by increased cardiovascular stress at any given heart rate. Athletes and trainers should exhibit caution when prescribing a specific DWR exercise intensity based on HR max date obtained from a land based test. A downward adjustment of 12n17 beats per minute is considered prudent to ensure that exercise intensity is appropriate to the goal of the training program and to the traineeis current ability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10578310127608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine, Training and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10578310127608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
深水跑步(DWR)是一种模拟陆上跑步(LBR)的水上运动,但似乎造成更少的肌肉骨骼压力。因此,它已成为一种流行的训练方式,运动员从伤病中恢复。在三种运动强度下,分别研究了DWR和LBR的心理生理效应。最大心率(HR max)使用Cooper 1.5英里跑步测试建立,Karvonen心率储备(HRR)方法分别在60%,70%和80% HRR下计算运动强度。6名男性和4名女性,平均年龄(‐SD)为28.1 - 4.9岁,不熟悉DWR,在DWR和LBR条件下进行了30分钟的测试。每次测试分别由60%、70%和80% HRR的3 × 10分钟时间段组成。在每一时段的最后一分钟记录感知用力评分(RPE)。LBR和DWR的RPE差异分别为60% (11.4 Vs 12.8, p < 0.001)、70% (12.9 Vs 15.2, p < 0.001)和80% (14.5 Vs 17.7, p < 0.001)。RPE的显著差异归因于与任务不熟悉相关的局部疲劳,反映在任何给定心率下心血管压力的增加。运动员和教练在根据陆上测试获得的HR max数据开出特定的DWR运动强度处方时应谨慎。为了确保运动强度适合训练计划的目标和训练者目前的能力,将每分钟12n17次的运动强度向下调整是谨慎的。
A Comparison of Ratings of Perceived Exertion During Deep Water Running and Treadmill Running: Considerations in the Prescription of Exercise Intensity
Deep water running (DWR) is a form a aquatic exercise that simulates the action of land based running (LBR), but appears to cause less musculo-skeletal stress. Consequently, it has become a popular training modality for athletes recovering from injury. The psychophysical effects of DWR and LBR respectively were investigated at three exercise intensities. Maximum heart rate (HR max ) was established using a Cooper 1.5 mile run test and the Karvonen Heart Rate Reserve (HRR) method was used to calculate exercise intensity at 60%, 70%, and 80% HRR, respectively. Six males and four females with a mean age (‐SD) of 28.1 ‐ 4.9 years and unfamiliar with DWR undertook a 30-minute test in both DWR and LBR conditions. Each test consisted of 3 x 10 minute periods at 60%, 70%, and 80% HRR respectively. Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) was recorded during the last minute of each period. A difference in RPE was found between LBR and DWR at 60% (11.4 Vs 12.8, p < 0.001), 70% (12.9 Vs 15.2, p < 0.001), and 80% HRR (14.5 Vs 17.7, p < 0.001). A significant difference in RPE was attributed to localized fatigue associated with the unfamiliarity of the task, reflected by increased cardiovascular stress at any given heart rate. Athletes and trainers should exhibit caution when prescribing a specific DWR exercise intensity based on HR max date obtained from a land based test. A downward adjustment of 12n17 beats per minute is considered prudent to ensure that exercise intensity is appropriate to the goal of the training program and to the traineeis current ability.