CSP应用超临界CO2循环的设计、非设计及年度性能分析

Dhinesh Thanganadar, F. Fornarelli, S. Camporeale, F. Asfand, K. Patchigolla
{"title":"CSP应用超临界CO2循环的设计、非设计及年度性能分析","authors":"Dhinesh Thanganadar, F. Fornarelli, S. Camporeale, F. Asfand, K. Patchigolla","doi":"10.1115/GT2020-14790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) cycles are studied as the next-generation power cycles in order to reduce the cost of Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) plants. The design performance of numerous cycles has been investigated, nevertheless, the off-design and annual performance of these cycles are seldom studied. This plays a critical role in selecting an optimal cycle for CSP application, as an efficient power cycle influences the solar field size, consequently affecting the Levelised cost of electricity (LCOE). In this study, the design, off-design and annual performance of three sCO2 cycles; simple recuperative, recompression and partial-cooling cycles are studied. Multi-objective optimisation was performed and the off-design Pareto fronts were compared for the changes in the power cycle boundary conditions. Annual performance simulation was carried out, and the performance of the three cycles was compared when the power cycle is operated in maximum efficiency mode, which facilitates selecting the optimal cycle. The LCOE of the simple recuperated cycle was higher by roughly 1.7¢/kWh than recompression cycle when maximising the power cycle efficiency and the partial cooling cycle is higher by 0.2¢/kWh. However, operating the power cycle in the maximum efficiency mode significantly lowers the plant capacity factor (around 10–20%).","PeriodicalId":186943,"journal":{"name":"Volume 11: Structures and Dynamics: Structural Mechanics, Vibration, and Damping; Supercritical CO2","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Design, Off-Design and Annual Performance of Supercritical CO2 Cycles for CSP Applications\",\"authors\":\"Dhinesh Thanganadar, F. Fornarelli, S. Camporeale, F. Asfand, K. Patchigolla\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/GT2020-14790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) cycles are studied as the next-generation power cycles in order to reduce the cost of Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) plants. The design performance of numerous cycles has been investigated, nevertheless, the off-design and annual performance of these cycles are seldom studied. This plays a critical role in selecting an optimal cycle for CSP application, as an efficient power cycle influences the solar field size, consequently affecting the Levelised cost of electricity (LCOE). In this study, the design, off-design and annual performance of three sCO2 cycles; simple recuperative, recompression and partial-cooling cycles are studied. Multi-objective optimisation was performed and the off-design Pareto fronts were compared for the changes in the power cycle boundary conditions. Annual performance simulation was carried out, and the performance of the three cycles was compared when the power cycle is operated in maximum efficiency mode, which facilitates selecting the optimal cycle. The LCOE of the simple recuperated cycle was higher by roughly 1.7¢/kWh than recompression cycle when maximising the power cycle efficiency and the partial cooling cycle is higher by 0.2¢/kWh. However, operating the power cycle in the maximum efficiency mode significantly lowers the plant capacity factor (around 10–20%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":186943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 11: Structures and Dynamics: Structural Mechanics, Vibration, and Damping; Supercritical CO2\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 11: Structures and Dynamics: Structural Mechanics, Vibration, and Damping; Supercritical CO2\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2020-14790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 11: Structures and Dynamics: Structural Mechanics, Vibration, and Damping; Supercritical CO2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2020-14790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

为了降低聚光太阳能(CSP)电厂的成本,研究了超临界二氧化碳(sCO2)循环作为下一代动力循环。许多循环的设计性能已经被研究过,然而,对这些循环的非设计性能和年度性能的研究却很少。这在选择CSP应用的最佳循环中起着至关重要的作用,因为有效的电力循环会影响太阳能场的大小,从而影响平准化电力成本(LCOE)。在本研究中,三个sCO2循环的设计、非设计和年度性能;研究了简单的回热循环、再压缩循环和部分冷却循环。进行了多目标优化,并比较了功率循环边界条件变化的非设计Pareto前沿。进行了年度性能仿真,比较了功率循环在最高效率模式下运行时三个循环的性能,便于选择最优循环。当功率循环效率达到最大时,简单回收循环的LCOE比再压缩循环高约1.7分/千瓦时,部分冷却循环的LCOE高0.2分/千瓦时。然而,在最高效率模式下运行功率循环会显著降低电厂容量系数(约10-20%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Design, Off-Design and Annual Performance of Supercritical CO2 Cycles for CSP Applications
Supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) cycles are studied as the next-generation power cycles in order to reduce the cost of Concentrating Solar Power (CSP) plants. The design performance of numerous cycles has been investigated, nevertheless, the off-design and annual performance of these cycles are seldom studied. This plays a critical role in selecting an optimal cycle for CSP application, as an efficient power cycle influences the solar field size, consequently affecting the Levelised cost of electricity (LCOE). In this study, the design, off-design and annual performance of three sCO2 cycles; simple recuperative, recompression and partial-cooling cycles are studied. Multi-objective optimisation was performed and the off-design Pareto fronts were compared for the changes in the power cycle boundary conditions. Annual performance simulation was carried out, and the performance of the three cycles was compared when the power cycle is operated in maximum efficiency mode, which facilitates selecting the optimal cycle. The LCOE of the simple recuperated cycle was higher by roughly 1.7¢/kWh than recompression cycle when maximising the power cycle efficiency and the partial cooling cycle is higher by 0.2¢/kWh. However, operating the power cycle in the maximum efficiency mode significantly lowers the plant capacity factor (around 10–20%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信