预测膝关节关节软骨弹性应变能的粘-低弹性与粘-超弹性模型比较

R. González-Navarrete, A. Vidal-Lesso, Hector PLASCENCIA MORA, Xavier Ulises Huerta-Jacobo
{"title":"预测膝关节关节软骨弹性应变能的粘-低弹性与粘-超弹性模型比较","authors":"R. González-Navarrete, A. Vidal-Lesso, Hector PLASCENCIA MORA, Xavier Ulises Huerta-Jacobo","doi":"10.1115/imece2021-69494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The aim of this work is to propose a viscoelastic material model for human cartilage tissue that allows simulating its structural stiffness and elastic strain energy that absorbs per unit volume.\n For this, experimental data reported from flat cylindrical indentation test on human samples of seven patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis (N = 7) were used. These data allowed the use of one linear model and the adjustment of two non-linear material models, a visco-hypoelastic (VE) and a visco-hyperelastic (VHE) model. The finite element models for the indentation test considered the indenter as a rigid body, the cartilage and subchondral bone as deformable bodies. The indentation force (F, material model structural reaction) and resilience modulus (Er, elastic strain energy per unit volume) were considered as validation parameters.\n The results suggest that largest differences respect to experimental data were found with the linear model (up to 44.33% for Er and 21.75% for F). The best model to reproduce the indentation force was the VHE (mean difference of 3.37±1.03%), while for the elastic strain energy per unit volume, the best model was the VE (mean difference of 16.65±12.74%).","PeriodicalId":314012,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: Biomedical and Biotechnology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparison of Visco-Hypoelastic and Visco-Hyperelastic Model to Predict the Elastic Strain Energy for Articular Cartilage of Knee Joint\",\"authors\":\"R. González-Navarrete, A. Vidal-Lesso, Hector PLASCENCIA MORA, Xavier Ulises Huerta-Jacobo\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/imece2021-69494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The aim of this work is to propose a viscoelastic material model for human cartilage tissue that allows simulating its structural stiffness and elastic strain energy that absorbs per unit volume.\\n For this, experimental data reported from flat cylindrical indentation test on human samples of seven patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis (N = 7) were used. These data allowed the use of one linear model and the adjustment of two non-linear material models, a visco-hypoelastic (VE) and a visco-hyperelastic (VHE) model. The finite element models for the indentation test considered the indenter as a rigid body, the cartilage and subchondral bone as deformable bodies. The indentation force (F, material model structural reaction) and resilience modulus (Er, elastic strain energy per unit volume) were considered as validation parameters.\\n The results suggest that largest differences respect to experimental data were found with the linear model (up to 44.33% for Er and 21.75% for F). The best model to reproduce the indentation force was the VHE (mean difference of 3.37±1.03%), while for the elastic strain energy per unit volume, the best model was the VE (mean difference of 16.65±12.74%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":314012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 5: Biomedical and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 5: Biomedical and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-69494\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: Biomedical and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2021-69494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本工作的目的是提出一种人体软骨组织的粘弹性材料模型,可以模拟其结构刚度和单位体积吸收的弹性应变能。为此,我们使用了7例单室骨关节炎患者(N = 7)人体样本扁平圆柱压痕试验报告的实验数据。这些数据允许使用一个线性模型和调整两个非线性材料模型,一个粘-低弹性(VE)和一个粘-超弹性(VHE)模型。压痕试验的有限元模型将压痕作为刚体,软骨和软骨下骨作为可变形体。以压痕力(F,材料模型结构反应)和弹性模量(Er,单位体积弹性应变能)作为验证参数。结果表明,线性模型与实验数据的差异最大(Er为44.33%,F为21.75%),对压痕力的最佳模拟模型为VHE(平均差值为3.37±1.03%),对单位体积弹性应变能的最佳模拟模型为VE(平均差值为16.65±12.74%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparison of Visco-Hypoelastic and Visco-Hyperelastic Model to Predict the Elastic Strain Energy for Articular Cartilage of Knee Joint
The aim of this work is to propose a viscoelastic material model for human cartilage tissue that allows simulating its structural stiffness and elastic strain energy that absorbs per unit volume. For this, experimental data reported from flat cylindrical indentation test on human samples of seven patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis (N = 7) were used. These data allowed the use of one linear model and the adjustment of two non-linear material models, a visco-hypoelastic (VE) and a visco-hyperelastic (VHE) model. The finite element models for the indentation test considered the indenter as a rigid body, the cartilage and subchondral bone as deformable bodies. The indentation force (F, material model structural reaction) and resilience modulus (Er, elastic strain energy per unit volume) were considered as validation parameters. The results suggest that largest differences respect to experimental data were found with the linear model (up to 44.33% for Er and 21.75% for F). The best model to reproduce the indentation force was the VHE (mean difference of 3.37±1.03%), while for the elastic strain energy per unit volume, the best model was the VE (mean difference of 16.65±12.74%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信