油棕农林业作为包容性油棕生产的替代方案

Ari Susanti, H. Marhaento, S. Riyanto, D. Permadi, Budiadi, M. Imron, F. Ardiansyah, H. H. Nurjanto, D. Susanto, Darmawati Ridho, S. Maimunah, B. Irawan, Viktoria Vero, I. Bakhtiar, Diah Y. Suradiredja
{"title":"油棕农林业作为包容性油棕生产的替代方案","authors":"Ari Susanti, H. Marhaento, S. Riyanto, D. Permadi, Budiadi, M. Imron, F. Ardiansyah, H. H. Nurjanto, D. Susanto, Darmawati Ridho, S. Maimunah, B. Irawan, Viktoria Vero, I. Bakhtiar, Diah Y. Suradiredja","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.98205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oil palm has been widely adopted and cultivated as monoculture plantations in Indonesia. Research suggests that these monoculture practices have led to adverse impacts both on natural and human systems and smallholder farmers have been severely impacted by these unsustainable practices. This chapter aims to analyze how oil palm agroforestry (OPAF) has been adopted by smallholder farmers in the Jambi and Central Kalimantan provinces of Indonesia as part of the social forestry (SF) program to solve the tenure-related conflict in the designated forest areas which are disturbed by monoculture oil palm plantations managed by smallholder farmers. This chapter shows that although oil palm is widely adopted as monoculture plantations for the sake of high yielding, smallholder farmers tend to adopt OPAF to maintain the stability of household incomes amidst the uncertainty of oil palm price in the global market and secure their tenurial access to the designated forest lands. Their perception of OPAF is influenced by their knowledge and determines their decision in adopting OPAF. However, peer pressure and external supports also play important roles in accelerating the adoption of OPAF. More efforts on evidence and knowledge production, communication with stakeholders, and expert backstopping are needed to accelerate the adoption of OPAF.","PeriodicalId":152828,"journal":{"name":"Elaeis guineensis [Working Title]","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oil Palm Agroforestry as an Alternative towards Inclusive Oil Palm Production\",\"authors\":\"Ari Susanti, H. Marhaento, S. Riyanto, D. Permadi, Budiadi, M. Imron, F. Ardiansyah, H. H. Nurjanto, D. Susanto, Darmawati Ridho, S. Maimunah, B. Irawan, Viktoria Vero, I. Bakhtiar, Diah Y. Suradiredja\",\"doi\":\"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.98205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Oil palm has been widely adopted and cultivated as monoculture plantations in Indonesia. Research suggests that these monoculture practices have led to adverse impacts both on natural and human systems and smallholder farmers have been severely impacted by these unsustainable practices. This chapter aims to analyze how oil palm agroforestry (OPAF) has been adopted by smallholder farmers in the Jambi and Central Kalimantan provinces of Indonesia as part of the social forestry (SF) program to solve the tenure-related conflict in the designated forest areas which are disturbed by monoculture oil palm plantations managed by smallholder farmers. This chapter shows that although oil palm is widely adopted as monoculture plantations for the sake of high yielding, smallholder farmers tend to adopt OPAF to maintain the stability of household incomes amidst the uncertainty of oil palm price in the global market and secure their tenurial access to the designated forest lands. Their perception of OPAF is influenced by their knowledge and determines their decision in adopting OPAF. However, peer pressure and external supports also play important roles in accelerating the adoption of OPAF. More efforts on evidence and knowledge production, communication with stakeholders, and expert backstopping are needed to accelerate the adoption of OPAF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Elaeis guineensis [Working Title]\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Elaeis guineensis [Working Title]\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.98205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elaeis guineensis [Working Title]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.98205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度尼西亚,油棕作为单一栽培种植园被广泛采用和种植。研究表明,这些单一栽培做法对自然系统和人类系统都造成了不利影响,小农受到这些不可持续做法的严重影响。本章旨在分析印度尼西亚占比省和中加里曼丹省的小农如何采用油棕农林(OPAF)作为社会林业(SF)计划的一部分,以解决由小农管理的单一种植油棕种植园干扰的指定森林地区与权属相关的冲突。本章表明,虽然油棕被广泛采用为单作种植,以获得高产,但在全球市场油棕价格不确定的情况下,小农倾向于采用OPAF来维持家庭收入的稳定,并确保他们对指定林地的使用权。他们对OPAF的认知受其知识的影响,并决定了他们采用OPAF的决定。然而,同行压力和外部支持在加速采用OPAF方面也起着重要作用。需要在证据和知识的产生、与利益攸关方的沟通以及专家支持方面做出更多努力,以加快OPAF的采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oil Palm Agroforestry as an Alternative towards Inclusive Oil Palm Production
Oil palm has been widely adopted and cultivated as monoculture plantations in Indonesia. Research suggests that these monoculture practices have led to adverse impacts both on natural and human systems and smallholder farmers have been severely impacted by these unsustainable practices. This chapter aims to analyze how oil palm agroforestry (OPAF) has been adopted by smallholder farmers in the Jambi and Central Kalimantan provinces of Indonesia as part of the social forestry (SF) program to solve the tenure-related conflict in the designated forest areas which are disturbed by monoculture oil palm plantations managed by smallholder farmers. This chapter shows that although oil palm is widely adopted as monoculture plantations for the sake of high yielding, smallholder farmers tend to adopt OPAF to maintain the stability of household incomes amidst the uncertainty of oil palm price in the global market and secure their tenurial access to the designated forest lands. Their perception of OPAF is influenced by their knowledge and determines their decision in adopting OPAF. However, peer pressure and external supports also play important roles in accelerating the adoption of OPAF. More efforts on evidence and knowledge production, communication with stakeholders, and expert backstopping are needed to accelerate the adoption of OPAF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信