关于缺失的软件需求,开放领域模型能告诉我们什么:初步研究

Ziyan Zhao, Li Zhang, Xiaoli Lian
{"title":"关于缺失的软件需求,开放领域模型能告诉我们什么:初步研究","authors":"Ziyan Zhao, Li Zhang, Xiaoli Lian","doi":"10.1109/RE51729.2021.00010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Completeness is one of the most important attributes of software requirement specification. Unfortunately, incompleteness is one of the most difficult violations to detect. Some approaches have been proposed to detect missing requirements based on the requirement-oriented domain model. However, these kinds of models are actually lack for lots of domains. Fortunately, the domain models constructed for different purposes can usually be found online. This raises a question: whether or not these domain models are useful for finding the missing functional information in requirement specification? To explore this question, we design and conduct a preliminary study by computing the overlapping rate between the entities in domain models and the concepts of natural language software requirements, and then digging into four regularities of the occurrence of these entities(concepts) based on two example domains. The usefulness of these regularities, especially the one based our proposed metric AHME (with 54% and 70% of F2 on the two domains), has been initially evaluated with an additional experiment.","PeriodicalId":440285,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What can Open Domain Model Tell Us about the Missing Software Requirements: A Preliminary Study\",\"authors\":\"Ziyan Zhao, Li Zhang, Xiaoli Lian\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RE51729.2021.00010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Completeness is one of the most important attributes of software requirement specification. Unfortunately, incompleteness is one of the most difficult violations to detect. Some approaches have been proposed to detect missing requirements based on the requirement-oriented domain model. However, these kinds of models are actually lack for lots of domains. Fortunately, the domain models constructed for different purposes can usually be found online. This raises a question: whether or not these domain models are useful for finding the missing functional information in requirement specification? To explore this question, we design and conduct a preliminary study by computing the overlapping rate between the entities in domain models and the concepts of natural language software requirements, and then digging into four regularities of the occurrence of these entities(concepts) based on two example domains. The usefulness of these regularities, especially the one based our proposed metric AHME (with 54% and 70% of F2 on the two domains), has been initially evaluated with an additional experiment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE51729.2021.00010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 29th International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE51729.2021.00010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

完备性是软件需求规范最重要的属性之一。不幸的是,不完整性是最难检测的违规之一。基于面向需求的领域模型,提出了一些检测缺失需求的方法。然而,这些类型的模型实际上在很多领域是缺乏的。幸运的是,为不同目的构建的领域模型通常可以在网上找到。这就提出了一个问题:这些领域模型对于寻找需求规范中缺失的功能信息是否有用?为了探究这一问题,我们通过计算领域模型中实体与自然语言软件需求概念之间的重叠率,设计并进行了初步研究,然后基于两个示例领域,挖掘了这些实体(概念)出现的四种规律。这些规律的有用性,特别是基于我们提出的度量AHME的有用性(在两个域上分别有54%和70%的F2),已经通过额外的实验进行了初步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What can Open Domain Model Tell Us about the Missing Software Requirements: A Preliminary Study
Completeness is one of the most important attributes of software requirement specification. Unfortunately, incompleteness is one of the most difficult violations to detect. Some approaches have been proposed to detect missing requirements based on the requirement-oriented domain model. However, these kinds of models are actually lack for lots of domains. Fortunately, the domain models constructed for different purposes can usually be found online. This raises a question: whether or not these domain models are useful for finding the missing functional information in requirement specification? To explore this question, we design and conduct a preliminary study by computing the overlapping rate between the entities in domain models and the concepts of natural language software requirements, and then digging into four regularities of the occurrence of these entities(concepts) based on two example domains. The usefulness of these regularities, especially the one based our proposed metric AHME (with 54% and 70% of F2 on the two domains), has been initially evaluated with an additional experiment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信