伊维菌素治疗COVID-19的有效性:系统评价

O. Person, Jane de Eston Armond, Maria Eduarda Dos Santos Puga
{"title":"伊维菌素治疗COVID-19的有效性:系统评价","authors":"O. Person, Jane de Eston Armond, Maria Eduarda Dos Santos Puga","doi":"10.56242/globalhealth;2021;1;2;19-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivermectin in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: This is a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. We searched the electronic databases PubMed (1966-2021), EMBASE (1974-2021) and Clinical Trials (2021) and two evidence megabusers: Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database (2021) and Epstemonikos (2021). There was no geographic or language restriction, using DeCS descriptors and terms (Health Sciences Descriptors). The synthesis method involved the combination of similar studies in a narrative review. RESULTS: 463 citations were identified, and 2 studies were included, following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Both studies showed very low quality and reduced sampling. CONCLUSION: The studies completed and published to date do not support the use of ivermectin in the prevention or treatment of COVID-19. It is suggested to carry out new quality clinical trials to elucidate the issue.","PeriodicalId":285800,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of ivermectin for COVID-19: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"O. Person, Jane de Eston Armond, Maria Eduarda Dos Santos Puga\",\"doi\":\"10.56242/globalhealth;2021;1;2;19-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivermectin in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: This is a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. We searched the electronic databases PubMed (1966-2021), EMBASE (1974-2021) and Clinical Trials (2021) and two evidence megabusers: Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database (2021) and Epstemonikos (2021). There was no geographic or language restriction, using DeCS descriptors and terms (Health Sciences Descriptors). The synthesis method involved the combination of similar studies in a narrative review. RESULTS: 463 citations were identified, and 2 studies were included, following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Both studies showed very low quality and reduced sampling. CONCLUSION: The studies completed and published to date do not support the use of ivermectin in the prevention or treatment of COVID-19. It is suggested to carry out new quality clinical trials to elucidate the issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2021;1;2;19-23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2021;1;2;19-23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价伊维菌素防治新冠肺炎的疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项随机临床试验的系统综述。我们检索了PubMed(1966-2021)、EMBASE(1974-2021)和临床试验(2021)电子数据库以及两个证据超级用户:将研究转化为实践(TRIP)数据库(2021)和Epstemonikos(2021)。使用DeCS描述符和术语(健康科学描述符),没有地理或语言限制。综合方法是在一篇叙述性综述中结合类似的研究。结果:纳入文献463篇,纳入2项研究,符合纳入和排除标准。这两项研究都显示了非常低的质量和减少的采样。结论:迄今完成和发表的研究不支持使用伊维菌素预防或治疗COVID-19。建议开展新的高质量临床试验来阐明这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of ivermectin for COVID-19: A systematic review
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivermectin in the prevention and treatment of COVID-19. METHODS: This is a systematic review of randomized clinical trials. We searched the electronic databases PubMed (1966-2021), EMBASE (1974-2021) and Clinical Trials (2021) and two evidence megabusers: Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) database (2021) and Epstemonikos (2021). There was no geographic or language restriction, using DeCS descriptors and terms (Health Sciences Descriptors). The synthesis method involved the combination of similar studies in a narrative review. RESULTS: 463 citations were identified, and 2 studies were included, following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Both studies showed very low quality and reduced sampling. CONCLUSION: The studies completed and published to date do not support the use of ivermectin in the prevention or treatment of COVID-19. It is suggested to carry out new quality clinical trials to elucidate the issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信