最大限度地降低欧洲电力市场上自相矛盾的拒绝大宗订单的机会成本

Mehdi Madani, Mathieu Van Vyve
{"title":"最大限度地降低欧洲电力市场上自相矛盾的拒绝大宗订单的机会成本","authors":"Mehdi Madani, Mathieu Van Vyve","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2014.6861237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provide with the first formulation of an optimization problem that aims at minimizing total opportunity costs of so-called paradoxically rejected block orders (PRB) in non-convex European day-ahead electricity markets with uniform prices such as the CWE market. This is done in a way avoiding complementarity constraints to model market rules, and without binary variables to linearize them, instead relying on strong duality results. This key property is of much importance from an algorithmic viewpoint. A toy example shows that a welfare maximizing solution (WMS) may not be a solution minimizing opportunity costs (OCMS). However, computations on real data kindly provided by main European power exchanges show that most of the time, the WMS is at least very close to the OCMS. The present work is the first providing with mathematical programming tools to assess the real tradeoff between welfare optimality and opportunity costs of PRB in such non-convex markets.","PeriodicalId":261127,"journal":{"name":"11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14)","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimizing opportunity costs of paradoxically rejected block orders in European day-ahead electricity markets\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Madani, Mathieu Van Vyve\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EEM.2014.6861237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We provide with the first formulation of an optimization problem that aims at minimizing total opportunity costs of so-called paradoxically rejected block orders (PRB) in non-convex European day-ahead electricity markets with uniform prices such as the CWE market. This is done in a way avoiding complementarity constraints to model market rules, and without binary variables to linearize them, instead relying on strong duality results. This key property is of much importance from an algorithmic viewpoint. A toy example shows that a welfare maximizing solution (WMS) may not be a solution minimizing opportunity costs (OCMS). However, computations on real data kindly provided by main European power exchanges show that most of the time, the WMS is at least very close to the OCMS. The present work is the first providing with mathematical programming tools to assess the real tradeoff between welfare optimality and opportunity costs of PRB in such non-convex markets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14)\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2014.6861237\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"11th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM14)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2014.6861237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

我们提出了一个优化问题的第一个公式,该问题旨在使具有统一价格的非凸欧洲日前电力市场(如CWE市场)中所谓的悖论拒绝大宗订单(PRB)的总机会成本最小化。这是通过避免互补性约束来建模市场规则的方式完成的,并且没有二元变量来线性化它们,而是依赖于强对偶结果。从算法的角度来看,这个关键属性非常重要。一个简单的例子表明,福利最大化解决方案(WMS)可能不是最小化机会成本(OCMS)的解决方案。然而,对欧洲主要电力交易所提供的实际数据的计算表明,在大多数情况下,WMS至少非常接近OCMS。本文首次使用数学规划工具来评估非凸市场中福利最优性和机会成本之间的实际权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimizing opportunity costs of paradoxically rejected block orders in European day-ahead electricity markets
We provide with the first formulation of an optimization problem that aims at minimizing total opportunity costs of so-called paradoxically rejected block orders (PRB) in non-convex European day-ahead electricity markets with uniform prices such as the CWE market. This is done in a way avoiding complementarity constraints to model market rules, and without binary variables to linearize them, instead relying on strong duality results. This key property is of much importance from an algorithmic viewpoint. A toy example shows that a welfare maximizing solution (WMS) may not be a solution minimizing opportunity costs (OCMS). However, computations on real data kindly provided by main European power exchanges show that most of the time, the WMS is at least very close to the OCMS. The present work is the first providing with mathematical programming tools to assess the real tradeoff between welfare optimality and opportunity costs of PRB in such non-convex markets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信