衡量选民控制的隐私

H. Jonker, S. Mauw, Jun Pang
{"title":"衡量选民控制的隐私","authors":"H. Jonker, S. Mauw, Jun Pang","doi":"10.1109/ARES.2009.81","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In voting, the notion of receipt-freeness has been proposed to express that a voter cannot gain any information to prove that she has voted in a certain way. Receipt-freeness aims to prevent vote buying, even when a voter chooses to renounce her privacy. In this paper, we distinguish various ways that a voter can communicate with the intruder to reduce her privacy and classify them according to their ability to reduce the privacy of a voter. We develop a formal framework combining knowledge reasoning and trace equivalences to formally model voting protocols and define vote privacy for the voters. Our framework is quantitative, in the sense that it defines a measure for the privacy of a voter. Therefore, the framework can precisely measure the level of privacy for a voter for each of the identified privacy classes. The quantification allows our framework to capture receipts that reduce, but not nullify, the privacy of the voter. This has not been identified and dealt with by other formal approaches.","PeriodicalId":169468,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Voter-Controlled Privacy\",\"authors\":\"H. Jonker, S. Mauw, Jun Pang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ARES.2009.81\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In voting, the notion of receipt-freeness has been proposed to express that a voter cannot gain any information to prove that she has voted in a certain way. Receipt-freeness aims to prevent vote buying, even when a voter chooses to renounce her privacy. In this paper, we distinguish various ways that a voter can communicate with the intruder to reduce her privacy and classify them according to their ability to reduce the privacy of a voter. We develop a formal framework combining knowledge reasoning and trace equivalences to formally model voting protocols and define vote privacy for the voters. Our framework is quantitative, in the sense that it defines a measure for the privacy of a voter. Therefore, the framework can precisely measure the level of privacy for a voter for each of the identified privacy classes. The quantification allows our framework to capture receipts that reduce, but not nullify, the privacy of the voter. This has not been identified and dealt with by other formal approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2009.81\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARES.2009.81","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

在投票中,提出了无收据的概念,以表示选民无法获得任何信息来证明她以某种方式投票。“无收据”旨在防止贿选,即使选民选择放弃自己的隐私。在本文中,我们区分了选民与入侵者通信以减少其隐私的各种方式,并根据其减少选民隐私的能力对它们进行了分类。我们开发了一个结合知识推理和跟踪等价的形式化框架,以形式化地建模投票协议并为选民定义投票隐私。我们的框架是定量的,从某种意义上说,它定义了选民隐私的衡量标准。因此,该框架可以精确地测量每个已识别的隐私类的投票人的隐私级别。量化允许我们的框架捕获收据,这些收据减少了选民的隐私,但没有使其无效。其他正式方法尚未确定和处理这一问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Voter-Controlled Privacy
In voting, the notion of receipt-freeness has been proposed to express that a voter cannot gain any information to prove that she has voted in a certain way. Receipt-freeness aims to prevent vote buying, even when a voter chooses to renounce her privacy. In this paper, we distinguish various ways that a voter can communicate with the intruder to reduce her privacy and classify them according to their ability to reduce the privacy of a voter. We develop a formal framework combining knowledge reasoning and trace equivalences to formally model voting protocols and define vote privacy for the voters. Our framework is quantitative, in the sense that it defines a measure for the privacy of a voter. Therefore, the framework can precisely measure the level of privacy for a voter for each of the identified privacy classes. The quantification allows our framework to capture receipts that reduce, but not nullify, the privacy of the voter. This has not been identified and dealt with by other formal approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信