巴西-美国出口流量如何应对汇率波动(2000-2017)

Danilo Luciano Pires, C. R. F. Vasconcelos
{"title":"巴西-美国出口流量如何应对汇率波动(2000-2017)","authors":"Danilo Luciano Pires, C. R. F. Vasconcelos","doi":"10.37423/210904732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of the present study was to investigate the symmetric or asymmetric duality of the bilateral real exchange rate volatility variable. In other words, this work wants to know how the export flow between Brazil and the United States would respond if it were the same (symmetrical volatility) or different (asymmetric volatility) to the fluctuations of exchange rate volatility. To estimate the model, the nonlinear dynamic method NARDL nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag of Shin et al. (2014). And the exchange rate volatility variable was constructed based on the conditional variance of the type GARCH(1,1). The export series data for the period 2000-2017 correspond to the 99 sectors disaggregated to two digits of the US-Brazil Harmonized System. The study found an asymmetry of 48% of the initial sample in the short term volatility and 18% of the initial sample in the long term. And finally, 18% of the initial sample of short and long term. Therefore, it seems restrictive not to consider the asymmetric effects on the volatility of the bilateral real exchange rate in international export models.","PeriodicalId":269115,"journal":{"name":"Economia e sustentabilidade: princípios fundamentais","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMO O FLUXO DE EXPORTAÇÃO BRASIL-EUA RESPONDE ÀS FLUTUAÇÕES DA VOLATILIDADE DA TAXA DE CÂMBIO (2000-2017)\",\"authors\":\"Danilo Luciano Pires, C. R. F. Vasconcelos\",\"doi\":\"10.37423/210904732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of the present study was to investigate the symmetric or asymmetric duality of the bilateral real exchange rate volatility variable. In other words, this work wants to know how the export flow between Brazil and the United States would respond if it were the same (symmetrical volatility) or different (asymmetric volatility) to the fluctuations of exchange rate volatility. To estimate the model, the nonlinear dynamic method NARDL nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag of Shin et al. (2014). And the exchange rate volatility variable was constructed based on the conditional variance of the type GARCH(1,1). The export series data for the period 2000-2017 correspond to the 99 sectors disaggregated to two digits of the US-Brazil Harmonized System. The study found an asymmetry of 48% of the initial sample in the short term volatility and 18% of the initial sample in the long term. And finally, 18% of the initial sample of short and long term. Therefore, it seems restrictive not to consider the asymmetric effects on the volatility of the bilateral real exchange rate in international export models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economia e sustentabilidade: princípios fundamentais\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economia e sustentabilidade: princípios fundamentais\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37423/210904732\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economia e sustentabilidade: princípios fundamentais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37423/210904732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是探讨双边实际汇率波动变量的对称或非对称对偶性。换句话说,这项工作想知道,如果巴西和美国之间的出口流量相同(对称波动)或不同(不对称波动),对汇率波动的波动将如何反应。为了估计模型,采用了Shin等(2014)的非线性动态方法NARDL非线性自回归分布滞后。基于GARCH(1,1)型的条件方差构造汇率波动率变量。2000-2017年期间的出口系列数据对应于美国-巴西协调制度中分解为两位数的99个部门。研究发现,48%的初始样本在短期波动中存在不对称性,18%的初始样本在长期波动中存在不对称性。最后,18%的短期和长期初始样本。因此,在国际出口模型中不考虑双边实际汇率波动的不对称效应似乎是限制性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMO O FLUXO DE EXPORTAÇÃO BRASIL-EUA RESPONDE ÀS FLUTUAÇÕES DA VOLATILIDADE DA TAXA DE CÂMBIO (2000-2017)
The objective of the present study was to investigate the symmetric or asymmetric duality of the bilateral real exchange rate volatility variable. In other words, this work wants to know how the export flow between Brazil and the United States would respond if it were the same (symmetrical volatility) or different (asymmetric volatility) to the fluctuations of exchange rate volatility. To estimate the model, the nonlinear dynamic method NARDL nonlinear Autoregressive Distributed Lag of Shin et al. (2014). And the exchange rate volatility variable was constructed based on the conditional variance of the type GARCH(1,1). The export series data for the period 2000-2017 correspond to the 99 sectors disaggregated to two digits of the US-Brazil Harmonized System. The study found an asymmetry of 48% of the initial sample in the short term volatility and 18% of the initial sample in the long term. And finally, 18% of the initial sample of short and long term. Therefore, it seems restrictive not to consider the asymmetric effects on the volatility of the bilateral real exchange rate in international export models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信