学习推理技巧和数学推理能力

Reni Septia Pratiwi, Martin Kustati, A. Susanto
{"title":"学习推理技巧和数学推理能力","authors":"Reni Septia Pratiwi, Martin Kustati, A. Susanto","doi":"10.15548/MEJ.V3I1.264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to find out the logical thinking skills of students who learn with Solok City's Solok Think Talk Write class VIII strategy. This research is a quasi-experimental design with Randomized Control Group Only Design. Random sampling technique. The experimental class VIIIG and the VIIIE control class were selected. The instrument of this study tests mathematical logical thinking skills. Based on the results of the test, the average experimental class was 80.81 higher than the control class of 75.03. Hypothesis testing with t-test shows that mathematical logical thinking ability of experimental class students is higher than control class students.","PeriodicalId":231880,"journal":{"name":"Math Educa Journal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Strategi Belajar Think Talk Write dan Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Matematis\",\"authors\":\"Reni Septia Pratiwi, Martin Kustati, A. Susanto\",\"doi\":\"10.15548/MEJ.V3I1.264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to find out the logical thinking skills of students who learn with Solok City's Solok Think Talk Write class VIII strategy. This research is a quasi-experimental design with Randomized Control Group Only Design. Random sampling technique. The experimental class VIIIG and the VIIIE control class were selected. The instrument of this study tests mathematical logical thinking skills. Based on the results of the test, the average experimental class was 80.81 higher than the control class of 75.03. Hypothesis testing with t-test shows that mathematical logical thinking ability of experimental class students is higher than control class students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Math Educa Journal\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Math Educa Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15548/MEJ.V3I1.264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Math Educa Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15548/MEJ.V3I1.264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是了解使用索洛克市“索洛克思、谈、写”第八课策略学习的学生的逻辑思维能力。本研究为准实验设计,采用随机对照组设计。随机抽样技术。选择实验组VIIIG和对照组VIIIE。本研究的工具测试数学逻辑思维能力。从测试结果来看,实验班的平均得分比对照组的75.03高80.81分。采用t检验的假设检验表明,实验班学生的数学逻辑思维能力高于对照组学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Strategi Belajar Think Talk Write dan Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Matematis
The purpose of this study was to find out the logical thinking skills of students who learn with Solok City's Solok Think Talk Write class VIII strategy. This research is a quasi-experimental design with Randomized Control Group Only Design. Random sampling technique. The experimental class VIIIG and the VIIIE control class were selected. The instrument of this study tests mathematical logical thinking skills. Based on the results of the test, the average experimental class was 80.81 higher than the control class of 75.03. Hypothesis testing with t-test shows that mathematical logical thinking ability of experimental class students is higher than control class students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信