学习无障碍用户评论的情感分析

Wajdi Aljedaani, F. Rustam, S. Ludi, Ali Ouni, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer
{"title":"学习无障碍用户评论的情感分析","authors":"Wajdi Aljedaani, F. Rustam, S. Ludi, Ali Ouni, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer","doi":"10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, people use different ways to express emotions and sentiments such as facial expressions, gestures, speech, and text. With the exponentially growing popularity of mobile applications (apps), accessibility apps have gained importance in recent years as it allows users with specific needs to use an app without many limitations. User reviews provide insightful information that helps for app evolution. Previously, work has been done on analyzing the accessibility in mobile applications using machine learning approaches. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no work done using sentiment analysis approaches to understand better how users feel about accessibility in mobile apps. To address this gap, we propose a new approach on an accessibility reviews dataset, where we use two sentiment analyzers, i.e., TextBlob and VADER along with Term Frequency—Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) and Bag-of-words (BoW) features for detecting the sentiment polarity of accessibility app reviews. We also applied six classifiers including, Logistic Regression, Support Vector, Extra Tree, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Gradient Boosting, and Ada Boost on both sentiments analyzers. Four statistical measures namely accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were used for evaluation. Our experimental evaluation shows that the TextBlob approach using BoW features achieves better results with accuracy of 0.86 than the VADER approach with accuracy of 0.82.","PeriodicalId":349977,"journal":{"name":"2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning Sentiment Analysis for Accessibility User Reviews\",\"authors\":\"Wajdi Aljedaani, F. Rustam, S. Ludi, Ali Ouni, Mohamed Wiem Mkaouer\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Nowadays, people use different ways to express emotions and sentiments such as facial expressions, gestures, speech, and text. With the exponentially growing popularity of mobile applications (apps), accessibility apps have gained importance in recent years as it allows users with specific needs to use an app without many limitations. User reviews provide insightful information that helps for app evolution. Previously, work has been done on analyzing the accessibility in mobile applications using machine learning approaches. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no work done using sentiment analysis approaches to understand better how users feel about accessibility in mobile apps. To address this gap, we propose a new approach on an accessibility reviews dataset, where we use two sentiment analyzers, i.e., TextBlob and VADER along with Term Frequency—Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) and Bag-of-words (BoW) features for detecting the sentiment polarity of accessibility app reviews. We also applied six classifiers including, Logistic Regression, Support Vector, Extra Tree, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Gradient Boosting, and Ada Boost on both sentiments analyzers. Four statistical measures namely accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were used for evaluation. Our experimental evaluation shows that the TextBlob approach using BoW features achieves better results with accuracy of 0.86 than the VADER approach with accuracy of 0.82.\",\"PeriodicalId\":349977,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW)\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASEW52652.2021.00053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

如今,人们用不同的方式来表达情绪和情感,如面部表情、手势、语言和文字。随着移动应用程序(app)的指数级增长,可访问性应用程序近年来变得越来越重要,因为它允许有特定需求的用户使用应用程序而不受许多限制。用户评论提供了有助于应用发展的深刻信息。以前,已经使用机器学习方法分析了移动应用程序中的可访问性。然而,据我们所知,还没有人使用情感分析方法来更好地理解用户对手机应用中的可访问性的感受。为了解决这一差距,我们在可访问性评论数据集上提出了一种新方法,其中我们使用两个情感分析仪,即TextBlob和VADER,以及术语频率-逆文档频率(TF-IDF)和词袋(BoW)特征来检测可访问性应用评论的情感极性。我们还应用了六种分类器,包括逻辑回归、支持向量、额外树、高斯朴素贝叶斯、梯度增强和Ada增强。采用正确率、精密度、召回率和f1评分四项统计指标进行评价。我们的实验评估表明,使用BoW特征的TextBlob方法取得了更好的结果,准确率为0.86,而VADER方法的准确率为0.82。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning Sentiment Analysis for Accessibility User Reviews
Nowadays, people use different ways to express emotions and sentiments such as facial expressions, gestures, speech, and text. With the exponentially growing popularity of mobile applications (apps), accessibility apps have gained importance in recent years as it allows users with specific needs to use an app without many limitations. User reviews provide insightful information that helps for app evolution. Previously, work has been done on analyzing the accessibility in mobile applications using machine learning approaches. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no work done using sentiment analysis approaches to understand better how users feel about accessibility in mobile apps. To address this gap, we propose a new approach on an accessibility reviews dataset, where we use two sentiment analyzers, i.e., TextBlob and VADER along with Term Frequency—Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) and Bag-of-words (BoW) features for detecting the sentiment polarity of accessibility app reviews. We also applied six classifiers including, Logistic Regression, Support Vector, Extra Tree, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Gradient Boosting, and Ada Boost on both sentiments analyzers. Four statistical measures namely accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were used for evaluation. Our experimental evaluation shows that the TextBlob approach using BoW features achieves better results with accuracy of 0.86 than the VADER approach with accuracy of 0.82.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信