北欧福利国家在移民和金融危机的影响下发生了变化

B. Greve, J. Kvist
{"title":"北欧福利国家在移民和金融危机的影响下发生了变化","authors":"B. Greve, J. Kvist","doi":"10.4337/9781789906745.00018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Known for their encompassing welfare model and low levels of inequality the Nordic countries also faced great economic and demographic challenges in the 2000s and 2010s. To varying degrees the financial crisis hit the Nordic countries just as migration was massive, especially in 2015-16 in Sweden. How did the countries respond in terms of reforming their welfare policies? Can the Nordic countries still be said to have distinct universal and generous welfare policies financed by progressive taxes resulting in low levels of inequality? This chapter provides answers to these two main questions through an analysis of policy changes and of inequality. First, the chapter provide core information about the development. Secondly, the chapter describes policy changes for unemployment benefits and social assistance and in personal income taxation, i.e. tax and benefits that are susceptible to change public expenditure and that might increase inequality, and link these changes to debates on austerity and migration. The next section of the chapter compares the trends across the Nordic countries. Hence, the comparative study identifies if changes are mainly driven by austerity or migration and what the similarities and differences are across the policy areas (unemployment, minimum income, and taxation). The chapter also looks into what has been labelled the “necessary politics†and that labour supply reforms were argued to be effective by that “it should pay to work†. The analysis includes the four Nordic countries as far as possible: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden .","PeriodicalId":178534,"journal":{"name":"Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nordic welfare state changes especially in the light of migration and the financial crisis\",\"authors\":\"B. Greve, J. Kvist\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/9781789906745.00018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Known for their encompassing welfare model and low levels of inequality the Nordic countries also faced great economic and demographic challenges in the 2000s and 2010s. To varying degrees the financial crisis hit the Nordic countries just as migration was massive, especially in 2015-16 in Sweden. How did the countries respond in terms of reforming their welfare policies? Can the Nordic countries still be said to have distinct universal and generous welfare policies financed by progressive taxes resulting in low levels of inequality? This chapter provides answers to these two main questions through an analysis of policy changes and of inequality. First, the chapter provide core information about the development. Secondly, the chapter describes policy changes for unemployment benefits and social assistance and in personal income taxation, i.e. tax and benefits that are susceptible to change public expenditure and that might increase inequality, and link these changes to debates on austerity and migration. The next section of the chapter compares the trends across the Nordic countries. Hence, the comparative study identifies if changes are mainly driven by austerity or migration and what the similarities and differences are across the policy areas (unemployment, minimum income, and taxation). The chapter also looks into what has been labelled the “necessary politics†and that labour supply reforms were argued to be effective by that “it should pay to work†. The analysis includes the four Nordic countries as far as possible: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden .\",\"PeriodicalId\":178534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906745.00018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Handbook on Austerity, Populism and the Welfare State","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906745.00018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

北欧国家以其全面的福利模式和低水平的不平等而闻名,但在2000年代和2010年代也面临着巨大的经济和人口挑战。金融危机在不同程度上冲击了北欧国家,正值移民规模庞大,尤其是2015-16年的瑞典。这些国家在改革福利政策方面是如何应对的?北欧国家还能被说成拥有独特的、普遍的、慷慨的福利政策吗?这些政策由累进税提供资金,导致不平等程度较低?本章通过对政策变化和不平等的分析,为这两个主要问题提供了答案。首先,本章提供了开发的核心信息。其次,本章描述了失业福利和社会援助以及个人所得税的政策变化,即税收和福利容易受到公共支出变化的影响,可能会增加不平等,并将这些变化与紧缩和移民的辩论联系起来。本章的下一部分比较了北欧国家的趋势。因此,比较研究确定了变化主要是由紧缩还是移民驱动的,以及各个政策领域(失业、最低收入和税收)的异同。本章还研究了被称为€œnecessary政治s的东西,以及劳动力供给改革被认为是有效的,因为€œit应该支付给工人。该分析尽可能地包括了四个北欧国家:丹麦、芬兰、挪威和瑞典。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nordic welfare state changes especially in the light of migration and the financial crisis
Known for their encompassing welfare model and low levels of inequality the Nordic countries also faced great economic and demographic challenges in the 2000s and 2010s. To varying degrees the financial crisis hit the Nordic countries just as migration was massive, especially in 2015-16 in Sweden. How did the countries respond in terms of reforming their welfare policies? Can the Nordic countries still be said to have distinct universal and generous welfare policies financed by progressive taxes resulting in low levels of inequality? This chapter provides answers to these two main questions through an analysis of policy changes and of inequality. First, the chapter provide core information about the development. Secondly, the chapter describes policy changes for unemployment benefits and social assistance and in personal income taxation, i.e. tax and benefits that are susceptible to change public expenditure and that might increase inequality, and link these changes to debates on austerity and migration. The next section of the chapter compares the trends across the Nordic countries. Hence, the comparative study identifies if changes are mainly driven by austerity or migration and what the similarities and differences are across the policy areas (unemployment, minimum income, and taxation). The chapter also looks into what has been labelled the “necessary politics†and that labour supply reforms were argued to be effective by that “it should pay to work†. The analysis includes the four Nordic countries as far as possible: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信