作为辐射敏感性验证的替代测试程序的大电流注入过度测试概率的实验评估

L. Badini, G. Spadacini, F. Grassi, S. Pignari, P. Bisognin, P. Pelissou
{"title":"作为辐射敏感性验证的替代测试程序的大电流注入过度测试概率的实验评估","authors":"L. Badini, G. Spadacini, F. Grassi, S. Pignari, P. Bisognin, P. Pelissou","doi":"10.23919/URSIGASS.2017.8105010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The correlation between Bulk Current Injection (BCI) and radiated susceptibility (RS) test setups is investigated through the statistical characterization of a parameter called over-testing, which defines the excess of injected interference of BCI with respect to RS. Statistics takes into account lack of knowledge on the frequency response of the common-mode impedance of equipment under test. Unlike previous works which investigated this issue through theoretical modeling, a fully experimental approach is presented here. The proposed analysis confirms that BCI is a valid alternative to RS verifications, and provides a solid methodology for relating BCI test levels to equivalent RS testing conditions.","PeriodicalId":377869,"journal":{"name":"2017 XXXIInd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental assessment of over-testing probability in Bulk Current Injection as an alternative test procedure to radiated susceptibility verifications\",\"authors\":\"L. Badini, G. Spadacini, F. Grassi, S. Pignari, P. Bisognin, P. Pelissou\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/URSIGASS.2017.8105010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The correlation between Bulk Current Injection (BCI) and radiated susceptibility (RS) test setups is investigated through the statistical characterization of a parameter called over-testing, which defines the excess of injected interference of BCI with respect to RS. Statistics takes into account lack of knowledge on the frequency response of the common-mode impedance of equipment under test. Unlike previous works which investigated this issue through theoretical modeling, a fully experimental approach is presented here. The proposed analysis confirms that BCI is a valid alternative to RS verifications, and provides a solid methodology for relating BCI test levels to equivalent RS testing conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 XXXIInd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 XXXIInd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/URSIGASS.2017.8105010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 XXXIInd General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/URSIGASS.2017.8105010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过一个被称为过度测试的参数的统计特征来研究大电流注入(BCI)和辐射磁化率(RS)测试设置之间的相关性,该参数定义了相对于RS的BCI注入干扰的过量。统计考虑了对被测设备共模阻抗频率响应的缺乏了解。与以往通过理论建模研究这一问题的作品不同,本文提出了一种完全实验的方法。建议的分析证实了BCI是RS验证的有效替代方案,并提供了将BCI测试水平与等效RS测试条件相关联的可靠方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental assessment of over-testing probability in Bulk Current Injection as an alternative test procedure to radiated susceptibility verifications
The correlation between Bulk Current Injection (BCI) and radiated susceptibility (RS) test setups is investigated through the statistical characterization of a parameter called over-testing, which defines the excess of injected interference of BCI with respect to RS. Statistics takes into account lack of knowledge on the frequency response of the common-mode impedance of equipment under test. Unlike previous works which investigated this issue through theoretical modeling, a fully experimental approach is presented here. The proposed analysis confirms that BCI is a valid alternative to RS verifications, and provides a solid methodology for relating BCI test levels to equivalent RS testing conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信