我们在排水沟里做什么:或者,如果不是过渡,那是什么?

Paul Fisher Davies
{"title":"我们在排水沟里做什么:或者,如果不是过渡,那是什么?","authors":"Paul Fisher Davies","doi":"10.1353/ink.2022.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:McCloud's transitions model of making sense of comics was inspirational in Understanding Comics, giving shape to comics' \"invisible art\" and co-opting an interest in gaps of the sort used in reception theory to lend comics a creative, engaged literariness that had previously been disregarded. However, the categories of transitions have been subject to some questioning—from the expansion offered by Abel and Madden, through the challenge of abstraction (Molotiu and Groensteen) and the difficulty of applying the model consistently to actual texts, though many have tried, including the What Were Comics? project. What can we do instead of transitions? What other categories might be proposed, and what general principles might we follow in suggesting how comics might use sequence and strategies other than what is drawn in the panels, and what lies between? This article outlines the ways in which comics theorists in the wake of McCloud have built upon and offered alternatives to his groundbreaking transitions model of meaning-making in comics.","PeriodicalId":392545,"journal":{"name":"Inks: The Journal of the Comics Studies Society","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What We Do in the Gutters: Or, If Not Transitions, What?\",\"authors\":\"Paul Fisher Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ink.2022.0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:McCloud's transitions model of making sense of comics was inspirational in Understanding Comics, giving shape to comics' \\\"invisible art\\\" and co-opting an interest in gaps of the sort used in reception theory to lend comics a creative, engaged literariness that had previously been disregarded. However, the categories of transitions have been subject to some questioning—from the expansion offered by Abel and Madden, through the challenge of abstraction (Molotiu and Groensteen) and the difficulty of applying the model consistently to actual texts, though many have tried, including the What Were Comics? project. What can we do instead of transitions? What other categories might be proposed, and what general principles might we follow in suggesting how comics might use sequence and strategies other than what is drawn in the panels, and what lies between? This article outlines the ways in which comics theorists in the wake of McCloud have built upon and offered alternatives to his groundbreaking transitions model of meaning-making in comics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":392545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inks: The Journal of the Comics Studies Society\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inks: The Journal of the Comics Studies Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ink.2022.0026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inks: The Journal of the Comics Studies Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ink.2022.0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:麦克劳德在《理解漫画》一书中提出的理解漫画的过渡模式很有启发性,它塑造了漫画的“无形艺术”,并借鉴了接受理论中对空白的兴趣,赋予漫画一种创造性的、参与性的文学性,而这种文学性此前一直被忽视。然而,过渡的类别受到了一些质疑——从Abel和Madden提出的扩展,到抽象的挑战(Molotiu和Groensteen),以及将模型始终应用于实际文本的困难,尽管许多人已经尝试过,包括《什么是漫画?》项目。除了过渡,我们还能做什么?还有哪些类别可以被提出?在建议漫画如何使用顺序和策略时,我们可以遵循哪些一般原则,而不是在面板上绘制的内容?这篇文章概述了在McCloud之后的漫画理论家所建立的方式,并提供了他在漫画中意义创造的开创性过渡模型的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What We Do in the Gutters: Or, If Not Transitions, What?
ABSTRACT:McCloud's transitions model of making sense of comics was inspirational in Understanding Comics, giving shape to comics' "invisible art" and co-opting an interest in gaps of the sort used in reception theory to lend comics a creative, engaged literariness that had previously been disregarded. However, the categories of transitions have been subject to some questioning—from the expansion offered by Abel and Madden, through the challenge of abstraction (Molotiu and Groensteen) and the difficulty of applying the model consistently to actual texts, though many have tried, including the What Were Comics? project. What can we do instead of transitions? What other categories might be proposed, and what general principles might we follow in suggesting how comics might use sequence and strategies other than what is drawn in the panels, and what lies between? This article outlines the ways in which comics theorists in the wake of McCloud have built upon and offered alternatives to his groundbreaking transitions model of meaning-making in comics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信