埃塞俄比亚东南部贝尔黑孜然(Nigella sativa L.)基因型产量稳定性分析

M. Beriso, G. Asefa
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚东南部贝尔黑孜然(Nigella sativa L.)基因型产量稳定性分析","authors":"M. Beriso, G. Asefa","doi":"10.14196/sjbs.v6i11.2510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Yield data of 12 black cumin ( Nigella sativa L.) cultivars tested across 9 rain-fed environments during the 2013-2015 growing season using RCBD in 3 replications. The AMMI analysis tested in nine environments (years) were showed that the yield was significantly affected (P<0.001) by genotypes and environment main effects. But non significant for GxE interaction. The model revealed that differences between the environments accounted for about 90% of the treatment sum of squares. The genotypes and the GxE interaction also accounted significantly for 4% and 6% respectively of the treatment SS. The first principal component axis (PCA 1) of the interaction captured 51.32% of the interaction sum of squares. Similarly, the second principal component axis (PCA2) explained a further 18.20% of the GEI sum of squares. The mean squares for the PCA 1 and PCA 2 were significant at P=0.01 and cumulatively contributed to 69.52% of the GxE interaction SS, leaving 30.37% of the variation in the GxE interaction in the residual. The AMMI and AMMI stability value (ASV) identified G10 as the most stable and high yielding genotype.","PeriodicalId":210831,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Animal Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stability analysis for grain yield of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) genotypes in Bale, South-East Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"M. Beriso, G. Asefa\",\"doi\":\"10.14196/sjbs.v6i11.2510\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Yield data of 12 black cumin ( Nigella sativa L.) cultivars tested across 9 rain-fed environments during the 2013-2015 growing season using RCBD in 3 replications. The AMMI analysis tested in nine environments (years) were showed that the yield was significantly affected (P<0.001) by genotypes and environment main effects. But non significant for GxE interaction. The model revealed that differences between the environments accounted for about 90% of the treatment sum of squares. The genotypes and the GxE interaction also accounted significantly for 4% and 6% respectively of the treatment SS. The first principal component axis (PCA 1) of the interaction captured 51.32% of the interaction sum of squares. Similarly, the second principal component axis (PCA2) explained a further 18.20% of the GEI sum of squares. The mean squares for the PCA 1 and PCA 2 were significant at P=0.01 and cumulatively contributed to 69.52% of the GxE interaction SS, leaving 30.37% of the variation in the GxE interaction in the residual. The AMMI and AMMI stability value (ASV) identified G10 as the most stable and high yielding genotype.\",\"PeriodicalId\":210831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Journal of Animal Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Journal of Animal Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14196/sjbs.v6i11.2510\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14196/sjbs.v6i11.2510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2013-2015生长季12个黑孜然(Nigella sativa L.)品种在9个雨养环境下使用RCBD 3个重复的产量数据。9个环境(年)的AMMI分析表明,基因型和环境主效应对产量有显著影响(P<0.001)。但GxE相互作用不显著。该模型显示,环境之间的差异约占处理平方和的90%。基因型和GxE互作分别占处理SS的4%和6%,互作的第一主成分轴(PCA 1)占互作平方和的51.32%。同样,第二主成分轴(PCA2)进一步解释了18.20%的GEI平方和。PCA 1和PCA 2的均方根均显著(P=0.01),累计贡献了69.52%的GxE相互作用SS,剩余30.37%的GxE相互作用变异。AMMI和AMMI稳定值(ASV)鉴定G10为最稳定高产的基因型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stability analysis for grain yield of black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) genotypes in Bale, South-East Ethiopia
Yield data of 12 black cumin ( Nigella sativa L.) cultivars tested across 9 rain-fed environments during the 2013-2015 growing season using RCBD in 3 replications. The AMMI analysis tested in nine environments (years) were showed that the yield was significantly affected (P<0.001) by genotypes and environment main effects. But non significant for GxE interaction. The model revealed that differences between the environments accounted for about 90% of the treatment sum of squares. The genotypes and the GxE interaction also accounted significantly for 4% and 6% respectively of the treatment SS. The first principal component axis (PCA 1) of the interaction captured 51.32% of the interaction sum of squares. Similarly, the second principal component axis (PCA2) explained a further 18.20% of the GEI sum of squares. The mean squares for the PCA 1 and PCA 2 were significant at P=0.01 and cumulatively contributed to 69.52% of the GxE interaction SS, leaving 30.37% of the variation in the GxE interaction in the residual. The AMMI and AMMI stability value (ASV) identified G10 as the most stable and high yielding genotype.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信