你只需要更高的精确度?寻求医疗人工智能的最低可接受精度

F. Cabitza, A. Campagner, F. Zotti, Alice Ravizza, Federico Sternini
{"title":"你只需要更高的精确度?寻求医疗人工智能的最低可接受精度","authors":"F. Cabitza, A. Campagner, F. Zotti, Alice Ravizza, Federico Sternini","doi":"10.33965/eh2020_202009l020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we will discuss the concept of the minimum level of accuracy an Artificial Intelligence system must exhibit in medical settings to be fit to its intended use and improve the daily practice of its intended users, the medical doctors. We will consider simple binary classification tasks in both diagnostic and prognostic ambit (like to discriminate between normal/abnormal case, and improvement/no improvement prospects). We will make the point that the common ways to determine this minimum acceptable accuracy are fraught with many conceptual and practical troubles. We will report about a small user study conducted to elicit the discriminative requirements from a sample of medical doctors, stratified both in general practitioners and specialists. Finally, we will present a simple nomogram by which to determine the minimum accuracy of a technological aid, once the human average performance and the desired level of accuracy are known. The nomogram is to be intended as a provocative simple tool to recognize that the technological tool is less important than a sound protocol in which to use it, responsibly and paying due attention to the role of the human decision makers.","PeriodicalId":393647,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on e-Health (EH2020)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ALL YOU NEED IS HIGHER ACCURACY? ON THE QUEST FOR MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY FOR MEDICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"authors\":\"F. Cabitza, A. Campagner, F. Zotti, Alice Ravizza, Federico Sternini\",\"doi\":\"10.33965/eh2020_202009l020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we will discuss the concept of the minimum level of accuracy an Artificial Intelligence system must exhibit in medical settings to be fit to its intended use and improve the daily practice of its intended users, the medical doctors. We will consider simple binary classification tasks in both diagnostic and prognostic ambit (like to discriminate between normal/abnormal case, and improvement/no improvement prospects). We will make the point that the common ways to determine this minimum acceptable accuracy are fraught with many conceptual and practical troubles. We will report about a small user study conducted to elicit the discriminative requirements from a sample of medical doctors, stratified both in general practitioners and specialists. Finally, we will present a simple nomogram by which to determine the minimum accuracy of a technological aid, once the human average performance and the desired level of accuracy are known. The nomogram is to be intended as a provocative simple tool to recognize that the technological tool is less important than a sound protocol in which to use it, responsibly and paying due attention to the role of the human decision makers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on e-Health (EH2020)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on e-Health (EH2020)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33965/eh2020_202009l020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on e-Health (EH2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/eh2020_202009l020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在本文中,我们将讨论人工智能系统在医疗环境中必须表现出的最低精度水平的概念,以适合其预期用途,并改善其预期用户(医生)的日常实践。我们将在诊断和预后范围内考虑简单的二元分类任务(如区分正常/异常病例,改善/无改善前景)。我们将指出,确定这个最低可接受精度的常用方法充满了许多概念和实践上的麻烦。我们将报告一项小型用户研究,旨在从医生样本中引出歧视性要求,分为全科医生和专科医生。最后,一旦人类的平均表现和期望的精度水平已知,我们将提出一个简单的nomogram,通过它来确定技术援助的最低精度。nomographic的目的是作为一种具有挑衅性的简单工具,以认识到技术工具不如一个可靠的协议重要,在这个协议中负责任地使用技术,并适当注意人类决策者的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ALL YOU NEED IS HIGHER ACCURACY? ON THE QUEST FOR MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE ACCURACY FOR MEDICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
In this paper we will discuss the concept of the minimum level of accuracy an Artificial Intelligence system must exhibit in medical settings to be fit to its intended use and improve the daily practice of its intended users, the medical doctors. We will consider simple binary classification tasks in both diagnostic and prognostic ambit (like to discriminate between normal/abnormal case, and improvement/no improvement prospects). We will make the point that the common ways to determine this minimum acceptable accuracy are fraught with many conceptual and practical troubles. We will report about a small user study conducted to elicit the discriminative requirements from a sample of medical doctors, stratified both in general practitioners and specialists. Finally, we will present a simple nomogram by which to determine the minimum accuracy of a technological aid, once the human average performance and the desired level of accuracy are known. The nomogram is to be intended as a provocative simple tool to recognize that the technological tool is less important than a sound protocol in which to use it, responsibly and paying due attention to the role of the human decision makers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信