保证自治的组合覆盖

D. Kuhn, M. Raunak, R. Kacker
{"title":"保证自治的组合覆盖","authors":"D. Kuhn, M. Raunak, R. Kacker","doi":"10.1109/ISSREW55968.2022.00092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the advancement of Artificial Intelligence and Ma-chine Learning (AI/ML), we are observing a rapid increase of autonomous systems in safety-critical domains, such as smart medical equipment, self-driving vehicles, and unmanned aircraft. These systems are required to be made ultra reliable using state of the art verification and validation methodologies. Existing verification, validation, and assurance efforts, such as DO-178C guidance for avionics software, depend on structural coverage based testing, such as MC/DC coverage. Such structural coverage criteria require that test cases are chosen to ensure that a specified level of statements, decisions, and paths are systematically exercised. Neural network and other machine learning based systems, however, are not well suited to be tested with such structural coverage dependent criteria [1], [2]. This is because the performance of machine learning functions such as neural networks depends on the data used to train and test the model, rather than in specifically coded behavior. Behaviors of such systems will change depending on inputs used in the training.","PeriodicalId":178302,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","volume":"287 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combinatorial Coverage for Assured Autonomy\",\"authors\":\"D. Kuhn, M. Raunak, R. Kacker\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISSREW55968.2022.00092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the advancement of Artificial Intelligence and Ma-chine Learning (AI/ML), we are observing a rapid increase of autonomous systems in safety-critical domains, such as smart medical equipment, self-driving vehicles, and unmanned aircraft. These systems are required to be made ultra reliable using state of the art verification and validation methodologies. Existing verification, validation, and assurance efforts, such as DO-178C guidance for avionics software, depend on structural coverage based testing, such as MC/DC coverage. Such structural coverage criteria require that test cases are chosen to ensure that a specified level of statements, decisions, and paths are systematically exercised. Neural network and other machine learning based systems, however, are not well suited to be tested with such structural coverage dependent criteria [1], [2]. This is because the performance of machine learning functions such as neural networks depends on the data used to train and test the model, rather than in specifically coded behavior. Behaviors of such systems will change depending on inputs used in the training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178302,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"volume\":\"287 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW55968.2022.00092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops (ISSREW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSREW55968.2022.00092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着人工智能和机器学习(AI/ML)的进步,我们看到在安全关键领域(如智能医疗设备、自动驾驶汽车和无人驾驶飞机)的自主系统迅速增加。这些系统需要使用最先进的验证和验证方法来实现超可靠。现有的验证、确认和保证工作,例如航空电子软件的DO-178C指导,依赖于基于测试的结构覆盖,例如MC/DC覆盖。这种结构覆盖标准要求选择测试用例,以确保系统地执行指定级别的语句、决策和路径。然而,神经网络和其他基于机器学习的系统并不适合用这种结构覆盖依赖标准进行测试[1],[2]。这是因为神经网络等机器学习功能的性能取决于用于训练和测试模型的数据,而不是特定编码的行为。这种系统的行为将根据训练中使用的输入而改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combinatorial Coverage for Assured Autonomy
With the advancement of Artificial Intelligence and Ma-chine Learning (AI/ML), we are observing a rapid increase of autonomous systems in safety-critical domains, such as smart medical equipment, self-driving vehicles, and unmanned aircraft. These systems are required to be made ultra reliable using state of the art verification and validation methodologies. Existing verification, validation, and assurance efforts, such as DO-178C guidance for avionics software, depend on structural coverage based testing, such as MC/DC coverage. Such structural coverage criteria require that test cases are chosen to ensure that a specified level of statements, decisions, and paths are systematically exercised. Neural network and other machine learning based systems, however, are not well suited to be tested with such structural coverage dependent criteria [1], [2]. This is because the performance of machine learning functions such as neural networks depends on the data used to train and test the model, rather than in specifically coded behavior. Behaviors of such systems will change depending on inputs used in the training.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信