林业产业R&D演进探析:以智利和芬兰为例

P. Catalán, C. Moreno, S. Cozzens
{"title":"林业产业R&D演进探析:以智利和芬兰为例","authors":"P. Catalán, C. Moreno, S. Cozzens","doi":"10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Natural resources based economies have followed diverging paths either by consolidating its raw material industries by improving its technological competitiveness or by falling in wasteful rent-seeking processes leading to stagnant situations. We explore the R&D evolution in the Forestry Industry by focusing on Chile's and Finland's case. By setting two datasets of 7,724 (Finland) and 1,207 (Chile) forestry publications covering the 1970-2006 period we analyze the trends followed by each R&D community regarding timing, institution, author and research areas patterns. We state that collaboration and multidisciplinarity are distinctive features of Finland's R&D Forestry system, applied at a smaller scale by Chile's.","PeriodicalId":423894,"journal":{"name":"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring R&D Evolution in the Forestry Industry: The Cases of Chile and Finland\",\"authors\":\"P. Catalán, C. Moreno, S. Cozzens\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472896\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Natural resources based economies have followed diverging paths either by consolidating its raw material industries by improving its technological competitiveness or by falling in wasteful rent-seeking processes leading to stagnant situations. We explore the R&D evolution in the Forestry Industry by focusing on Chile's and Finland's case. By setting two datasets of 7,724 (Finland) and 1,207 (Chile) forestry publications covering the 1970-2006 period we analyze the trends followed by each R&D community regarding timing, institution, author and research areas patterns. We state that collaboration and multidisciplinarity are distinctive features of Finland's R&D Forestry system, applied at a smaller scale by Chile's.\",\"PeriodicalId\":423894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472896\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 Atlanta Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ACSTIP.2007.4472896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

以自然资源为基础的经济体要么通过提高其技术竞争力来巩固其原材料工业,要么陷入浪费的寻租过程,导致停滞不前。我们以智利和芬兰的案例为重点,探讨林业产业的研发演变。通过设置涵盖1970-2006年期间的7,724份(芬兰)和1,207份(智利)林业出版物的两个数据集,我们分析了每个研发社区在时间、机构、作者和研究领域模式方面遵循的趋势。我们指出,合作和多学科是芬兰研发林业系统的显著特点,智利的研发林业系统在较小规模上也得到了应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring R&D Evolution in the Forestry Industry: The Cases of Chile and Finland
Natural resources based economies have followed diverging paths either by consolidating its raw material industries by improving its technological competitiveness or by falling in wasteful rent-seeking processes leading to stagnant situations. We explore the R&D evolution in the Forestry Industry by focusing on Chile's and Finland's case. By setting two datasets of 7,724 (Finland) and 1,207 (Chile) forestry publications covering the 1970-2006 period we analyze the trends followed by each R&D community regarding timing, institution, author and research areas patterns. We state that collaboration and multidisciplinarity are distinctive features of Finland's R&D Forestry system, applied at a smaller scale by Chile's.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信