论绩效评估系统中数字指标的局限性

Tim Pidun, Carsten Felden
{"title":"论绩效评估系统中数字指标的局限性","authors":"Tim Pidun, Carsten Felden","doi":"10.1109/EDOCW.2011.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many business processes cannot be easily measured due to their non-deterministic or qualitative nature. So, to fit in common performance measurement systems (PMS), artificial and simplifying measures are used that are complicated and costly to create and evaluate. Using a literature review, this paper documents the dominance of PMS that rely on KPIs and a lack of those that also incorporate non-numeric, generic indicators that better address qualitative problems. Considering the need for better transparency and comparability of business processes as well as visibility of process performance, the final necessity of deployment for are fined PMS using additional indirect indicators is derived. It would be able to assess hidden performance problems and to reveal additional improvement possibilities.","PeriodicalId":351015,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Restriction to Numeric Indicators in Performance Measurement Systems\",\"authors\":\"Tim Pidun, Carsten Felden\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDOCW.2011.16\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many business processes cannot be easily measured due to their non-deterministic or qualitative nature. So, to fit in common performance measurement systems (PMS), artificial and simplifying measures are used that are complicated and costly to create and evaluate. Using a literature review, this paper documents the dominance of PMS that rely on KPIs and a lack of those that also incorporate non-numeric, generic indicators that better address qualitative problems. Considering the need for better transparency and comparability of business processes as well as visibility of process performance, the final necessity of deployment for are fined PMS using additional indirect indicators is derived. It would be able to assess hidden performance problems and to reveal additional improvement possibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2011.16\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 15th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDOCW.2011.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

由于许多业务流程的不确定性或定性性质,它们不容易度量。因此,为了适应常见的绩效评估系统(PMS),使用了人工和简化的测量方法,这些方法的创建和评估既复杂又昂贵。通过文献综述,本文记录了依赖kpi的PMS的主导地位,以及缺乏那些也包含非数字的、更好地解决定性问题的通用指标的PMS。考虑到需要更好的业务流程透明度和可比性,以及流程性能的可见性,最终需要使用额外的间接指标部署已定义的PMS。它将能够评估隐藏的性能问题,并揭示其他改进的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Restriction to Numeric Indicators in Performance Measurement Systems
Many business processes cannot be easily measured due to their non-deterministic or qualitative nature. So, to fit in common performance measurement systems (PMS), artificial and simplifying measures are used that are complicated and costly to create and evaluate. Using a literature review, this paper documents the dominance of PMS that rely on KPIs and a lack of those that also incorporate non-numeric, generic indicators that better address qualitative problems. Considering the need for better transparency and comparability of business processes as well as visibility of process performance, the final necessity of deployment for are fined PMS using additional indirect indicators is derived. It would be able to assess hidden performance problems and to reveal additional improvement possibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信