Vyacheslav Grishankov, A. Galimkhanov, S. Bogdanov, A. Kharitonov, E. Tikhonov, Almaz Khalilov, A. Berezin, M. Dubrovsky, Mikhail Tsibulsky, A. Suvorov, Igor Netichuk
{"title":"拉普捷夫海首口井钻井综合工程方法","authors":"Vyacheslav Grishankov, A. Galimkhanov, S. Bogdanov, A. Kharitonov, E. Tikhonov, Almaz Khalilov, A. Berezin, M. Dubrovsky, Mikhail Tsibulsky, A. Suvorov, Igor Netichuk","doi":"10.2118/191495-18rptc-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This document describes the integrated engineering approach and technical solution used to perform a construction project of the first wildcat well in Khatanga subsoil area of the Laptev Sea.\n Because of the small scope of performed geological exploration works and the absence of any previously drilled wells within the target area, a low degree of geological knowledge existed for this project. The unique location of the license area eventually complicated the profile of the Centralno-Olginskaya 1PO wildcat well and the logistics on the peninsula, consequently affecting the planning and performance of the project.\n In these conditions, RN-Shelf-Arktika OOO and Halliburton encountered a range of challenging tasks associated with high quality planning and safe performance of the expected work scope within the planned timeframes. Other challenges encountered included fulfilling all geological tasks required to reduce expenses and developing technological and organization solutions for the subsequent construction of wells and the discovery of a new oilfield in the Eastern Arctic.\n Because of the low level of geological knowledge about the territory, the operator regularly assigned new geological tasks. These changes eventually resulted in a longer wellbore (5530 m, rather than 4200 m), increased scope of geological activities (a longer coring interval of 156 m, rather than 90 m), and well design changes (five casing strings, rather than four).\n To ensure the fulfillment of the required tasks, the completion of the project was based on an integrated approach for the integrity of the proposed technological and organization solutions, high quality of planning, and risk management and application of advanced technologies. This approach ensured 100% fulfillment of the geological objectives within the established timeframes and helped to develop a map of lessons learned with recommendations to optimize time and costs in the construction of future wells at the new field. Because of the project remoteness and challenging climate conditions, the well construction cost is the key factor for efficient field development (Lebedeva et al. 2017).","PeriodicalId":242965,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 16, 2018","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated Engineering Approach for Drilling of the First Well in the Laptev Sea\",\"authors\":\"Vyacheslav Grishankov, A. Galimkhanov, S. Bogdanov, A. Kharitonov, E. Tikhonov, Almaz Khalilov, A. Berezin, M. Dubrovsky, Mikhail Tsibulsky, A. Suvorov, Igor Netichuk\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/191495-18rptc-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This document describes the integrated engineering approach and technical solution used to perform a construction project of the first wildcat well in Khatanga subsoil area of the Laptev Sea.\\n Because of the small scope of performed geological exploration works and the absence of any previously drilled wells within the target area, a low degree of geological knowledge existed for this project. The unique location of the license area eventually complicated the profile of the Centralno-Olginskaya 1PO wildcat well and the logistics on the peninsula, consequently affecting the planning and performance of the project.\\n In these conditions, RN-Shelf-Arktika OOO and Halliburton encountered a range of challenging tasks associated with high quality planning and safe performance of the expected work scope within the planned timeframes. Other challenges encountered included fulfilling all geological tasks required to reduce expenses and developing technological and organization solutions for the subsequent construction of wells and the discovery of a new oilfield in the Eastern Arctic.\\n Because of the low level of geological knowledge about the territory, the operator regularly assigned new geological tasks. These changes eventually resulted in a longer wellbore (5530 m, rather than 4200 m), increased scope of geological activities (a longer coring interval of 156 m, rather than 90 m), and well design changes (five casing strings, rather than four).\\n To ensure the fulfillment of the required tasks, the completion of the project was based on an integrated approach for the integrity of the proposed technological and organization solutions, high quality of planning, and risk management and application of advanced technologies. This approach ensured 100% fulfillment of the geological objectives within the established timeframes and helped to develop a map of lessons learned with recommendations to optimize time and costs in the construction of future wells at the new field. Because of the project remoteness and challenging climate conditions, the well construction cost is the key factor for efficient field development (Lebedeva et al. 2017).\",\"PeriodicalId\":242965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 16, 2018\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, October 16, 2018\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/191495-18rptc-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 16, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191495-18rptc-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本文件描述了在拉普捷夫海Khatanga底土区进行第一口野井施工项目时使用的综合工程方法和技术解决方案。由于已完成的地质勘探工作范围小,并且在目标区域内没有任何先前钻探的井,因此该项目的地质知识程度较低。许可证区域的独特位置最终使Centralno-Olginskaya 1PO野猫井的概况和半岛上的物流变得复杂,从而影响了项目的规划和执行。在这种情况下,RN-Shelf-Arktika OOO和哈里伯顿公司遇到了一系列具有挑战性的任务,这些任务与高质量的规划和在计划的时间内安全完成预期的工作范围有关。遇到的其他挑战包括完成所需的所有地质任务,以减少费用,为随后的钻井和在北极东部发现新油田开发技术和组织解决方案。由于该地区的地质知识水平较低,运营商定期分配新的地质任务。这些变化最终带来了更长的井眼(5530米,而不是4200米),更大的地质活动范围(取心间隔156米,而不是90米),以及井设计的变化(5个套管柱,而不是4个)。为了确保完成所需的任务,项目的完成是基于一种综合的方法,即提出的技术和组织解决方案的完整性、高质量的规划、风险管理和先进技术的应用。这种方法确保了在既定的时间框架内100%完成地质目标,并有助于制定经验教训图,为新油田未来的井建设提供优化时间和成本的建议。由于项目地处偏远且气候条件恶劣,因此建井成本是油田高效开发的关键因素(Lebedeva et al. 2017)。
Integrated Engineering Approach for Drilling of the First Well in the Laptev Sea
This document describes the integrated engineering approach and technical solution used to perform a construction project of the first wildcat well in Khatanga subsoil area of the Laptev Sea.
Because of the small scope of performed geological exploration works and the absence of any previously drilled wells within the target area, a low degree of geological knowledge existed for this project. The unique location of the license area eventually complicated the profile of the Centralno-Olginskaya 1PO wildcat well and the logistics on the peninsula, consequently affecting the planning and performance of the project.
In these conditions, RN-Shelf-Arktika OOO and Halliburton encountered a range of challenging tasks associated with high quality planning and safe performance of the expected work scope within the planned timeframes. Other challenges encountered included fulfilling all geological tasks required to reduce expenses and developing technological and organization solutions for the subsequent construction of wells and the discovery of a new oilfield in the Eastern Arctic.
Because of the low level of geological knowledge about the territory, the operator regularly assigned new geological tasks. These changes eventually resulted in a longer wellbore (5530 m, rather than 4200 m), increased scope of geological activities (a longer coring interval of 156 m, rather than 90 m), and well design changes (five casing strings, rather than four).
To ensure the fulfillment of the required tasks, the completion of the project was based on an integrated approach for the integrity of the proposed technological and organization solutions, high quality of planning, and risk management and application of advanced technologies. This approach ensured 100% fulfillment of the geological objectives within the established timeframes and helped to develop a map of lessons learned with recommendations to optimize time and costs in the construction of future wells at the new field. Because of the project remoteness and challenging climate conditions, the well construction cost is the key factor for efficient field development (Lebedeva et al. 2017).