基于多数据集的超声骨分割算法的标准化评价

Prashant U. Pandey, B. Hohlmann, Peter Brößner, I. Hacihaliloglu, Keiran Barr, T. Ungi, O. Zettinig, R. Prevost, G. Dardenne, Zian Fanti, W. Wein, E. Stindel, F. A. Cosío, P. Guy, G. Fichtinger, K. Radermacher, A. Hodgson
{"title":"基于多数据集的超声骨分割算法的标准化评价","authors":"Prashant U. Pandey, B. Hohlmann, Peter Brößner, I. Hacihaliloglu, Keiran Barr, T. Ungi, O. Zettinig, R. Prevost, G. Dardenne, Zian Fanti, W. Wein, E. Stindel, F. A. Cosío, P. Guy, G. Fichtinger, K. Radermacher, A. Hodgson","doi":"10.29007/q51n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ultrasound (US) bone segmentation is an important component of US-guided or- thopaedic procedures. While there are many published segmentation techniques, there is no direct way to compare their performance. We present a solution to this, by curating a multi-institutional set of US images and corresponding segmentations, and systematically evaluating six previously-published bone segmentation algorithms using consistent metric definitions. We find that learning-based segmentation methods outperform traditional al- gorithms that rely on hand-crafted image features, as measured by their Dice scores, RMS distance errors and segmentation success rates. However, there is no single best performing algorithm across the datasets, emphasizing the need for carefully evaluating techniques on large, heterogenous datasets. The datasets and evaluation framework described can be used to accelerate development of new segmentation algorithms.","PeriodicalId":385854,"journal":{"name":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardized Evaluation of Current Ultrasound Bone Segmentation Algorithms on Multiple Datasets\",\"authors\":\"Prashant U. Pandey, B. Hohlmann, Peter Brößner, I. Hacihaliloglu, Keiran Barr, T. Ungi, O. Zettinig, R. Prevost, G. Dardenne, Zian Fanti, W. Wein, E. Stindel, F. A. Cosío, P. Guy, G. Fichtinger, K. Radermacher, A. Hodgson\",\"doi\":\"10.29007/q51n\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ultrasound (US) bone segmentation is an important component of US-guided or- thopaedic procedures. While there are many published segmentation techniques, there is no direct way to compare their performance. We present a solution to this, by curating a multi-institutional set of US images and corresponding segmentations, and systematically evaluating six previously-published bone segmentation algorithms using consistent metric definitions. We find that learning-based segmentation methods outperform traditional al- gorithms that rely on hand-crafted image features, as measured by their Dice scores, RMS distance errors and segmentation success rates. However, there is no single best performing algorithm across the datasets, emphasizing the need for carefully evaluating techniques on large, heterogenous datasets. The datasets and evaluation framework described can be used to accelerate development of new segmentation algorithms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPiC Series in Health Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPiC Series in Health Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29007/q51n\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPiC Series in Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29007/q51n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

超声(US)骨分割是超声引导或骨科手术的重要组成部分。虽然有许多已发布的分割技术,但没有直接的方法来比较它们的性能。我们提出了一个解决方案,通过策划一组多机构的美国图像和相应的分割,并使用一致的度量定义系统地评估六种先前发表的骨分割算法。我们发现,基于学习的分割方法优于传统的依赖于手工制作的图像特征的算法,通过它们的Dice分数、RMS距离误差和分割成功率来衡量。然而,在数据集上没有单一的最佳算法,这强调了在大型异构数据集上仔细评估技术的必要性。所描述的数据集和评估框架可用于加速新分割算法的开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standardized Evaluation of Current Ultrasound Bone Segmentation Algorithms on Multiple Datasets
Ultrasound (US) bone segmentation is an important component of US-guided or- thopaedic procedures. While there are many published segmentation techniques, there is no direct way to compare their performance. We present a solution to this, by curating a multi-institutional set of US images and corresponding segmentations, and systematically evaluating six previously-published bone segmentation algorithms using consistent metric definitions. We find that learning-based segmentation methods outperform traditional al- gorithms that rely on hand-crafted image features, as measured by their Dice scores, RMS distance errors and segmentation success rates. However, there is no single best performing algorithm across the datasets, emphasizing the need for carefully evaluating techniques on large, heterogenous datasets. The datasets and evaluation framework described can be used to accelerate development of new segmentation algorithms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信