基于孵化器的多环境反应材料的发展

Pahriah Pahriah, Hendrawani Hendrawani
{"title":"基于孵化器的多环境反应材料的发展","authors":"Pahriah Pahriah, Hendrawani Hendrawani","doi":"10.33394/hjkk.v6i1.1598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This development aims to determine the characteristics and feasibility of multipleinquiry-based representation modules in the reaction rate material through theADDIE stage (Analyze, Design, Development Implementation and Evaluation)developed by Thiagarajan. This research and development was carried out untilthe development stage with adjustments based on development needs. Theassessment instrument used to determine the feasibility of the module is aquestionnaire sheet. The module feasibility was assessed by 2 material experts, 1media expert, 1 linguist, 1 colleague, 1 practitioner, and 10 students as subjects.Students involved in this study came from chemistry education study programsthat had undergone basic chemistry courses through limited trials. The data onthe value of the grievances obtained are still in the form of qualitative data andthen processed into quantitative data. Quantitative data are analyzed for eachaspect of the assessment. The final score obtained is converted to the level ofproduct feasibility qualitatively with the guidelines according to the criteria ofthe assessment category. The results of expert validation showed the averagepercentage (a) of material experts was 84% with very feasible categories; (b)media experts 90% with very decent categories; (c) linguists 97% with verydecent categories; (d) colleagues 79.6 categories worth%; (e) practitioners86.4% are very decent categories. The average response of students to productdevelopment results 89.5% with a very feasible category. This shows that themodules developed are feasible to be used at the stage of large-scale trials.","PeriodicalId":346446,"journal":{"name":"Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Laju Reaksi Dengan Multipel Representasi Berbasis Inkuiri\",\"authors\":\"Pahriah Pahriah, Hendrawani Hendrawani\",\"doi\":\"10.33394/hjkk.v6i1.1598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This development aims to determine the characteristics and feasibility of multipleinquiry-based representation modules in the reaction rate material through theADDIE stage (Analyze, Design, Development Implementation and Evaluation)developed by Thiagarajan. This research and development was carried out untilthe development stage with adjustments based on development needs. Theassessment instrument used to determine the feasibility of the module is aquestionnaire sheet. The module feasibility was assessed by 2 material experts, 1media expert, 1 linguist, 1 colleague, 1 practitioner, and 10 students as subjects.Students involved in this study came from chemistry education study programsthat had undergone basic chemistry courses through limited trials. The data onthe value of the grievances obtained are still in the form of qualitative data andthen processed into quantitative data. Quantitative data are analyzed for eachaspect of the assessment. The final score obtained is converted to the level ofproduct feasibility qualitatively with the guidelines according to the criteria ofthe assessment category. The results of expert validation showed the averagepercentage (a) of material experts was 84% with very feasible categories; (b)media experts 90% with very decent categories; (c) linguists 97% with verydecent categories; (d) colleagues 79.6 categories worth%; (e) practitioners86.4% are very decent categories. The average response of students to productdevelopment results 89.5% with a very feasible category. This shows that themodules developed are feasible to be used at the stage of large-scale trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v6i1.1598\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v6i1.1598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

该开发旨在通过Thiagarajan开发的addie阶段(分析、设计、开发、实施和评估)确定反应速率材料中基于多查询的表示模块的特征和可行性。这种研发一直进行到开发阶段,并根据开发需要进行调整。用于确定模块可行性的评估工具是一份问卷。模块可行性由2名材料专家、1名媒体专家、1名语言学家、1名同事、1名从业人员和10名学生作为研究对象进行评估。参与本研究的学生来自化学教育研究项目,通过有限的试验接受了基础化学课程。所获得的申诉价值数据仍采用定性数据的形式,再加工成定量数据。定量数据分析的每个方面的评估。根据评估类别的标准,将最终得分与指南定性地转换为产品可行性水平。专家验证结果表明,材料专家的平均百分比(a)为84%,类别非常可行;(b)媒体专家90%,类别非常不错;(c)语言学家97%的分类非常体面;(d)同事79.6个类别,价值%;(e)从业人员86.4%属于非常体面的类别。学生对产品开发结果的平均反应率为89.5%,具有非常可行的类别。这表明所开发的模块在大规模试验阶段是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Laju Reaksi Dengan Multipel Representasi Berbasis Inkuiri
This development aims to determine the characteristics and feasibility of multipleinquiry-based representation modules in the reaction rate material through theADDIE stage (Analyze, Design, Development Implementation and Evaluation)developed by Thiagarajan. This research and development was carried out untilthe development stage with adjustments based on development needs. Theassessment instrument used to determine the feasibility of the module is aquestionnaire sheet. The module feasibility was assessed by 2 material experts, 1media expert, 1 linguist, 1 colleague, 1 practitioner, and 10 students as subjects.Students involved in this study came from chemistry education study programsthat had undergone basic chemistry courses through limited trials. The data onthe value of the grievances obtained are still in the form of qualitative data andthen processed into quantitative data. Quantitative data are analyzed for eachaspect of the assessment. The final score obtained is converted to the level ofproduct feasibility qualitatively with the guidelines according to the criteria ofthe assessment category. The results of expert validation showed the averagepercentage (a) of material experts was 84% with very feasible categories; (b)media experts 90% with very decent categories; (c) linguists 97% with verydecent categories; (d) colleagues 79.6 categories worth%; (e) practitioners86.4% are very decent categories. The average response of students to productdevelopment results 89.5% with a very feasible category. This shows that themodules developed are feasible to be used at the stage of large-scale trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信