{"title":"谈话被认为是有害的?","authors":"S. Reeves","doi":"10.1145/3342775.3342796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a concept, 'conversation' is rife with troublemaking potential. It is not that we should necessarily abandon use of 'conversation' in conversational user interface (CUI) research, but rather treat it with a significant measure of care due to the varied conceptual problems it introduces---problems sketched in this paper. I suggest an alternative, possibly safer articulation and conceptual shift: conversation-sensitive design.","PeriodicalId":408689,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversation considered harmful?\",\"authors\":\"S. Reeves\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3342775.3342796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a concept, 'conversation' is rife with troublemaking potential. It is not that we should necessarily abandon use of 'conversation' in conversational user interface (CUI) research, but rather treat it with a significant measure of care due to the varied conceptual problems it introduces---problems sketched in this paper. I suggest an alternative, possibly safer articulation and conceptual shift: conversation-sensitive design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
As a concept, 'conversation' is rife with troublemaking potential. It is not that we should necessarily abandon use of 'conversation' in conversational user interface (CUI) research, but rather treat it with a significant measure of care due to the varied conceptual problems it introduces---problems sketched in this paper. I suggest an alternative, possibly safer articulation and conceptual shift: conversation-sensitive design.