谈话被认为是有害的?

S. Reeves
{"title":"谈话被认为是有害的?","authors":"S. Reeves","doi":"10.1145/3342775.3342796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a concept, 'conversation' is rife with troublemaking potential. It is not that we should necessarily abandon use of 'conversation' in conversational user interface (CUI) research, but rather treat it with a significant measure of care due to the varied conceptual problems it introduces---problems sketched in this paper. I suggest an alternative, possibly safer articulation and conceptual shift: conversation-sensitive design.","PeriodicalId":408689,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conversation considered harmful?\",\"authors\":\"S. Reeves\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3342775.3342796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a concept, 'conversation' is rife with troublemaking potential. It is not that we should necessarily abandon use of 'conversation' in conversational user interface (CUI) research, but rather treat it with a significant measure of care due to the varied conceptual problems it introduces---problems sketched in this paper. I suggest an alternative, possibly safer articulation and conceptual shift: conversation-sensitive design.\",\"PeriodicalId\":408689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342796\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

作为一个概念,“对话”充满了制造麻烦的可能性。这并不是说我们必须放弃在会话用户界面(CUI)研究中使用“会话”,而是由于它引入的各种概念问题——本文概述的问题——我们应该非常小心地对待它。我建议另一种可能更安全的表达方式和概念转变:对话敏感型设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conversation considered harmful?
As a concept, 'conversation' is rife with troublemaking potential. It is not that we should necessarily abandon use of 'conversation' in conversational user interface (CUI) research, but rather treat it with a significant measure of care due to the varied conceptual problems it introduces---problems sketched in this paper. I suggest an alternative, possibly safer articulation and conceptual shift: conversation-sensitive design.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信